One of the big themes that the global warming Alarmists harp on, over and over again, is that minutes count and we need to take action NOW! We continually see phrases such as "we've reached the tipping point" and that this is our "last chance" to save the planet.
The United Nation’s Paris Climate summit is under way and the public is being warned that this meeting will represent the “last chance” for nations to act on global warming before it’s too late.
Every UN Climate Summit Hailed as ‘Last Chance’ To Stop ‘Global Warming’ Before It’s Too Late
"A Global Warming Treaty’s Last Chance. That teetering edifice that is the Kyoto Protocol gets some emergency repair work this week as delegates from 180 countries gather in Bonn." - 2001
"With time running out for the global climate, your meeting in Montreal represents a last chance for action." - 2005
"World leaders will converge on Bali today for the start of negotiations which experts say could be the last chance to save the Earth." - 2007
"This round of negotiations is likely to be our last chance as a species to deal with the problem." - 2008
"But the agreement we all hope to reach in Copenhagen next year represents the last chance to bring climate change under control before it is too late." - 2009
"Attended by over 200 countries, this week’s major UN conference has been described by many experts as humanity’s last chance to avert the disastrous effects of climate change." - 2011
"Is the Warsaw Climate Change Conference a last-chance summit?" - 2013
"Last chance: Change needed for climate negotiations in Lima 2014." - 2014
"The UN meeting in December is “the last chance” to avert dangerous climate change." - 2015
That's 15 years of 'last chances'.
Then we have the now-infamous "97% of all scientists agree" meme that both Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama have cited as proof that this is our, well, last chance to save the planet. The video below does a delightful job of totally dismantling this fraudulent statistic.
No, it's not a 97% consensus
Just 50%, not media-hyped 97%, of scientists blame humans for climate change
The myth of the 97% climate change consensus
This brings us to Al Gore. Say, what's that coming out of the smokestacks in his 2006 documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth'?
As any good Alarmist will tell you, global warming means both more hurricanes as well as stronger ones. But unfortunately...
NOAA: Record 11th Hurricane Season Ends Without Major Strike on U.S.
An unprecedented 11 years, one month and seven days has passed since the last major hurricane struck the U.S. mainland, according to data going back to 1851 compiled by NOAA.
Tornadoes, too, are forecast to increase due to you-know-what. But unfortunately...
A mere one tornado has struck the U.S. in November as yearly totals near historic lows
In all of November, only one lonely tornado has touched down in the entire U.S. This lack of tornadoes is nearly unprecedented, but consistent with the calendar year of 2016, in which has twister activity has rivaled the lowest levels on record.
The documentary does an excellent job of destroying both Al Gore and all of the 'severe weather' memes we're inundated with these days.
It then harkens us back to the 70's, when 'global cooling' was all the rage.
Or, was it? Let's check the faithful Wikipedia, shall we?
Massive Cover-Up Exposed: Lying Alarmists Rebranded 70s Global Cooling Scare as a Myth
Richard shows that during the 1960s and 1970s, there was an 86 percent
scientific consensus that the planet was on a cooling path. But this was
airbrushed out of history so successfully that even now if you do a
Google search on “70s global cooling scare” the top results claim it
never really happened.
...
All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand.
Of course, if rewriting history is their goal, I'd say they've got their work cut out for them. For a truly amazing list, glance over this page.
The video also has some revealing tidbits from the past, like how the Greenland ice sheet and arctic sea ice were thinner back in the 30's than they are today.
It also interviews some former leading Alarmists, all of which proves to be a real eye-opener.
Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans are dominant cause of warming climate
James Lovelock, Godfather of Green: Climate Change Religion is Bunk
So, On With The Show!
This is slightly over an hour long, so settle down, grab a drink and maybe some munchies and enjoy it to its fullest. There have been a number of global warming debunking videos over the years, but this is the cream of the crop. Click on the little gadget on the right of the tool bar to pop it open to full-screen size.
Quite revealing, wasn't it?
Epilogue
One aspect the documentary doesn't touch upon much is how badly the Alarmists have lost the battle over the past few years. Here are some examples.
First, the infamous Pew Research poll from 2009 that asked Americans to prioritize 20 subjects by order of importance — whereupon 'global warming' came in dead last.
Economy, Jobs Trump All Other Policy Priorities In 2009
Then they specifically asked the public about just global warming:
Pew: Most Americans Don’t Believe in ‘Scientific Consensus’ on Climate Change
Nearly three-quarters of Americans don’t trust that there is a large “scientific consensus” amongst climate scientists on human behavior being the cause of climate change, according to an in-depth survey on “the politics of climate” released Tuesday by Pew Research Center.
Then there's Yahoo News. For the uninitiated, Yahoo News is a left-leaning links site. They constantly feature opinion pieces from such far-left blog sites as the Daily Beast and the Huffington Post, passing them off as 'news' articles. As such, you would expect its readership to be filled with a bunch of global warming-loving liberals.
Statue of Liberty, other world sites threatened by climate change, says U.N.
There are over 3,000 comments, and you have to look long and hard to find one that isn't somehow mocking or ridiculing the article.
This brings us to the recent election:
For 4th straight election, Libertarians get more votes than Greens
But there's one thing Libertarian Party supporters can celebrate: For the fourth straight election, they got more votes than the Green Party. Their presidential nominee, Jill Stein, got a little more than a quarter of the votes Johnson got.
And then there's the rest of the world:
UN Poll Shows Climate Change Is the Lowest of All Global Concerns
Every year the UN runs a poll which surveys people’s greatest concerns across the world.
It’s significant because the responses run into the millions and canvas the views of people from all countries, rich and poor.
So guess where ‘climate change’ comes on the global population’s list of priorities.
Yes, that’s right. It comes right at the bottom.
That's particularly telling, because one common meme among the greenies is that Americans are dumb and simply don't know what's good for them. That's why we need the greenies; to understand that we immediately need to quit eating red meat, driving gasoline cars, et cetera, ad nauseum, ad infinitum, in order to save the planet. But the U.N. poll is from numerous countries.
Also, while it would be easy to dismiss a Pew or Rasmussen poll because it only surveyed 1,500 people, the U.N. poll encompassed over nine million people, from multiple age groups and economic strata. So it's the real deal.
Meanwhile, back in America...
People in the news media aren't fools. They recognize what's trending and what's not. And it's easy to tell from both Nielsen ratings and web page views. If the latest article on Kim Kardashian receives a million views and the article on how global warming is going to kill us all by the year 2035 unless we take action NOW receives 1,836 views, well, that says something.
Major TV networks spent just 50 minutes on climate change — combined — last year
That’s a dramatic 66-percent drop in coverage from 2015 across evening and Sunday news programs airing on ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox, according to a new study from Media Matters. ABC, for one, spent just six minutes on climate issues in 2016.
Suddenly the phrase end of an era springs to mind.
And not a moment too soon.
Related Links
For your personal viewing pleasure, a download link for the 'Climate Hustle' video is here.
My own piece on global warming, whereupon I dismantle the entire scheme piece-by-piece, is here. It starts at the very beginning of this epic saga with Mt. Kilimanjaro, touches upon why NASA's Jim Hanson should be labeled an international eco-criminal and thrown into prison for fomenting a movement that is literally destroying entire nations, as well as the many and varied reasons why the whole scheme continues to flourish.
In the final analysis, the global warming alarmists really have only one thing going for them; the melting of the arctic sea ice. I was watching a documentary on the sinking of the Titanic the other night, and guess what?
My plan to start up a new 'green' movement is here. Got $50 mil lying around? Let's do lunch!
