We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
Blockchain methodology is interesting but there are some limitations to it, including bandwidth and energy requirements. Some of my work involves architecture stuff on really large data systems that are using unstructured data (no rows and columns) instead relying on metadata tags, essentially electronic labels that affix themselves to a piece of data. At some point the metadata - like blockchain info - starts to far outweigh the original data. This gets expensive due to memory and energy costs. So it's not clear to me how far they can push blockchain into routine management activities.
For logistics and contractual work it makes sense - it's a great way to authenticate when a contract is validly signed, or when a pallet left a warehouse, and arrives at the new place. It turns those basic online or data system hookups into trusted transactions that you can rely on. But yeah, costs.