Maggie's Farm

We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.

Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page

Much Sorry with Delays
Birth, Death and All That Stuff in Between
How to Honor Labor Day, Every Day
My Yom Kippur Miracle (Repost from 2010)
Good intro to fly casting
Peach update, with pie
NYC update
Easy for you to say: To the elites on mass immigration
For NYC on 9/11, Sailors' Snug Harbor
Pickled Peaches
Water Shoes
Labor Costs in U.S.
Your "identity"
Good news about The Great Courses
Uses of Hot Pepper Jelly/Sauce, Chutneys, and Jams
A Saturday Drive to Litchfield County, CT
How to Pick a Kayak
Civilized: Fruit forks and knives
Loads of kayaking on Cape Cod
Psychology Experiments' Questionable Results

Categories


All categories

Quicksearch

Links

Blog Administration

Open login screen

RSS Readers

Add to Google

Subscribe with Bloglines

Saturday, October 8. 2016

Should medical care be a public utility?

A thorough review of the history of medical care in America along with the legal rationales for government regulation of a variety of industries: Medicine as a Public Calling


Had medical care become an industry? A single industry? A monopoly?  It's complicated, and like all areas in which government gets involved, it is more political than logical. As FDR said about Social Security, "This is not about economics, it's about politics."


At issue, in part, is whether medical care is a commodity. As my practice goes, it is far from a commodity. After studying the article, I began to wonder whether similar arguments might be equally-applicable to the legal and the accounting businesses. Even to the plumbing business.

Posted by Dr. Joy Bliss in Politics at 14:52 | Comments (6) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

In short, no.
#1 jma on 2016-10-08 15:08 (Reply)
If there is a good argument for utilities to be monopolies, it's that it's too hard to set up a lot of competing networks if each of them requires a complicated physical delivery system to each home. The medical system is nothing like that. It thrives on competition. Why make it a utility or a monopoly? We know perfectly well that's a good way to guarantee a degradation of service and an increase in price. We put up with these effects only when we have no good alternative. No need to proliferate monopolies.
#2 Texan99 on 2016-10-08 16:14 (Reply)
Someone once told me "you can't use too much healthcare" so in their mind it's not something "that can be wasted" and is therefore a "public utility."

I then asked them if they had ever heard of hypochondria. I took it a step further and told them how, when he was in the Navy, my father's waiting room was filled the minute it opened with base wives having a coffee klatch. They'd show up with minor abrasions, bruises, hangnails...anything to get out of the house.

Free care has its downside. And it can be overused and misused.

I asked this person how they'd feel if, since health care might be 'free' someone got badly injured performing a ridiculously dangerous and stupid stunt? It's one thing to think twice about something which could shatter your leg when you might have to pay to get it fixed. It's quite another if you don't have to pay.

I'm not saying that consideration would stop anyone truly that crazy. But it would stop enough people.

However, we do need a way to manage costs for people who suffer from congenital and chronic issues which have nothing to do with their own life mismanagement. It's possible that shared-risk cooperative exchanges could provide better options for people than our current state of affairs. But that would require making insurance a truly open market.
#3 Bulldog on 2016-10-08 18:23 (Reply)
Does your training include the word "codependency"?

Then why are you discussing a begged question? That's not an issue. It's a fallacy.
#4 Ten on 2016-10-09 06:55 (Reply)
Only commodities can be public utilities.
Medicine is not commodifiable.

You can pretend that it is, much as you can pretend that a man is a woman.
But that does not make it so.

Redefining words is part of the weaponry of the left.
#5 KCFleming on 2016-10-09 10:59 (Reply)
Once healthcare becomes a state monopoly, the state will give itself the power to regulate every aspect of your life in order to limit the expenses your life will generate for the state.
After all, your "dangerous lifestyle" is now no longer something between you, your health insurance (who probably makes you pay a higher premium now) and your doctors, but a matter of public concern.
So the government will have to be able to dictate every aspect of your diet, your hobbies, your exercise regimen, your travels, etc. etc..
And of course monitor all that 24/7 to ensure compliance, with fines and mandatory admission to "clinics" as penalty for violations and to "cure you of your unhealthy tendencies' (like tendencies to vote for parties who would abolish the system).

If that's the kind of society you want to live in, be my guest and please move to North Korea. I'd prefer to retain some level of freedom from government meddling.
#6 JTW on 2016-10-10 01:15 (Reply)

Add Comment
(Your e-mail will not show in your comment)

By commenting on this site you agree to the site rules listed here. Email
addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for email notifications.

Quick reference guide: [i] italics [/i], [b] bold [/b], [u] underline [/u],
[url] (web address) [/url]. More tips here.

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed
 
 
A Chris Southern Consulting website.