Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, September 5. 2016Monday link dumpFirst Africa-Wide Elephant Census Shows Dropping Populations - Survey confirms the damage wrought by poaching Is Your Manliness Hurting the Planet? Sorry, Uncle Sam: E-cigarettes just aren't that bad Safe spaces 'critical' to student success, college prez says Higher education, beyond parody - A voice from Chicago U. against the retreat from reason and learning College Students Need Remedial Classes in How to Be Adults Political Correctness Prevents Syracuse University from Screening Israeli Film - 'I will lose credibility with a number of film and Women/Gender studies colleagues.' ESPN Speaker Apologizes for Saying America Does Not Oppress Blacks Obamacare: No Successes to Build On Why Now is the Right Time to Talk About Ethanol Red States Really Are The Model Of Economic Success
Top Clinton Foundation Official: “This Is Not Charity” We Citizens Have to Guard the Media 'Guardians' - Mainstream media journalists rationalize their war on Trump.
Where Has Hillary Clinton Been? Ask the Ultrarich Time to take the car keys away from Granny Clinton No need to, She said she hasn't driven a car in 25 years. Clinton Lead Evaporates In Latest Poll Meet the mastermind behind Clinton’s massive email coverup Hillary Clinton’s Mind-Boggling FBI Interview – What Was Cheryl Mills Doing There? FBI Interview Catches Hillary Clinton In Multiple Lies Hillary Clinton, rarely seen, rarely heard Here are a bunch of ways Hillary Clinton has avoided talking to journalists Trump’s Home Run: Two Quibbles—and Stepped-Up Elite Hatred Brexit "shock" threatens to do far more damage to the European economy than to Britain Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Despite this:
__________________________ Clinton Lead Evaporates In Latest Poll Meet the mastermind behind Clinton’s massive email coverup Hillary Clinton’s Mind-Boggling FBI Interview – What Was Cheryl Mills Doing There? FBI Interview Catches Hillary Clinton In Multiple Lies Hillary Clinton, rarely seen, rarely heard ________________________________ Progressives/Libs will continue to support this crooked, corrupt old fart of a female candidate, because: VAGINA and Progress! Just more solid proof that "liberalism is a mental disease!" I don't think the fact that she's female matters that much to the insiders. Tribesman, tribeswoman, whatever. It is being used as a selling point for the rubes. There are lots of women for whom the idea of voting against Hillary seems an act of sororal treachery. Keeping them focused on that idea, and not on the questions of whether she would actually be any good at the job, are important.
This is more common among educated women, in my experience. The people supposedly trained to reason are unwilling to even engage the question, dismissing criticism out of hand as mere sexism. My comment on the Brown Univ statement about safe spots, vs. U of Chicago:
Brown's Guterl's stance helps parents (and students) decide where to spend their dough. The academic market is clarified: for tough, competitive students (and societies) that prepare people for the rigors of daily life (in academia or other work) go to Chicago; for coddling to prepare for something else, go to Brown (or Evergreen College, whose president wrote a similar statement). Some students need a protected environment to manage; others do well or even thrive in tough settings. Better that the Universities are so straightforward in what you will be paying for. Ethanol totally distorts the real marketplace for corn, but also drives up the cost of food in general. Not to mention that crop rotation is critical to preserving the soil we use for planting and eliminates the stretches of forests necessary to protect our farms from wind storms. This used to be elementary, but the dumbing down of the voters has given politicians and Big Agra an advantage at election time.
Not to mention, ethanol is horrible for car engines that were manufactured prior to the push for ethanol and all engines used for boating, lawnmowers and smaller power tools. Meanwhile, it's rotting our those underground tanks that, again, were built for gasoline, not ethanol. How did we get so dumb so fast? Corporate cronyism has replaced brain cells. Get the feds out of picking winners and losers. All those solar panels and windmills are killing our bird, bee and bat populations, which are critical to our ecological balance. What they're doing is picking losers and giving them lots of money to go bankrupt on.
Re: Red State Model.
It's to bad that when the blue staters leave their home, they move to a red state and continue to vote for the same lame policy's and politicians that caused the problem in their beloved blue state. Califonicating red states all over the west. Colorado was once a purple but mostly red state. Now we are deep blue, thanks to the millions of Californians that have moved here over the last fifteen years. I would also note that Californians looked down with disdain on us in the seventies. It is the same problem with immigrants from third world countries. They can't seem to figure out that it is lefty socialism that is the problem. But here they come, voting and supporting lefty socialism as soon as they can vote. I was born in California (1958)
It is the effing libs that came here and ruined this state. Eff all libs. I knew this would happen. I knew the polls would turn around, and they have. And while the press was calling for Trump to give up and drop out, they are silent now about this change in the polls. With very little spending on Trump's part and a WHOLE lot of spending on Clinton's part. This should be front page news: Hillary Lead in the Toilet.
Instead, we are still bombarded with Electoral maps that are inaccurate, references to old state polling and discussions about how Trump is doing terribly with this group or that group. So dishonest. QUOTE: The joke now in Connecticut is: Will the last person in the state please turn out the lights? As Connecticut depopulates ... Census Population 2000- 3,405,565 2010- 3,574,097 GDP, in billions of dollars 2011- 225 2012- 229 2013 per capita income of about $61 thousand was the highest in the U.S. But have the state and local tax burdens changed? A static income with increasing tax rates leaves you with less and less. Have the other cost of living indexes increased or decreased? Has government control on citizens increased or decreased?
Just looked it up:
Connecticut cost of living is 125.70. So that $61,000 is similar to $49,000 in a state where the cost of living is 100.00. Currently, average annual salary in the U.S. $51,939 (2014), so CT is slightly below average wage based on the cost of living. Nothing to be that proud of. MissT: Connecticut cost of living is 125.70.
Regional price parity for Connecticut is 108.8. http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/rpp/rpp_newsrelease.htm Regional? If you promote the income as highest across the country then price parity as across the region that is deceptive.
#6.1.1.1.1
indyjonesouthere
on
2016-09-06 13:43
(Reply)
indyjonesouthere: If you promote the income as highest across the country then price parity as across the region that is deceptive.
Not sure what point you are trying to make. Price parity is a standard way to compare purchasing power, which was the point raised by MissT.
#6.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2016-09-06 16:05
(Reply)
Last time I checked, it was 2016. CT has been losing population at an accelerating rate since 2012. GE is gone, more soon to follow, I wager. CT is one of six states with net population loss. Income figures are nice, but how far does your dollar go there?
Also, you need to examine WHO is leaving. Old retirees, OK. Young people with little or no job prospects and a prohibitive cost of living, not good. Outmigration, during a time of net population increase is a symptom of underlying weakness. Bottom line, do people want to live there? The answer appears to be: no. Population estimates as of July 1.
Population CT 2010 3,579,717 2011 3,589,759 2012 3,593,541 2013 3,597,168 2014 3,594,762 2015 3,590,886 Population US 2010 309,346,863 2011 311,718,857 2012 314,102,623 2013 316,427,395 2014 318,907,401 2015 321,418,820 2013-2015: US population increased by 1.5%; CT population decreased .0175 2010-2015: US population increased 3.9%; CT population increased 0.3% Earlier this year I flew from TX back to CT, my home state. The plane from TX to the Midwest was full, which was no surprise. The plane from the Midwest to Bradley Field [Hartford-Springfield] was only half full. That surprised me. How often do you see a half full flight these days? I concluded that no one wanted to go to CT anymore. Legislators in CT assumed that the golden goose of the CT economy could be taxed indefinitely and remain prosperous. Ditto the unions. They are finding out differently. US Census Bureau American Fact Finder Gringo: CT population decreased .0175
That would be 0.00175. Gringo: CT population increased 0.3%
That would be 3.8%. Oops. Ignore that.
#6.2.1.2.1
Zachriel
on
2016-09-06 10:17
(Reply)
Clinton: Last time I checked, it was 2016. CT has been losing population at an accelerating rate since 2012.
2012 3,593,541 2015 3,590,886 Net drop from 2012 was 2700 people, hardly a case of "depopulation". Most likely, this represents retirees leaving for warmer climes. As the population ages, this trend will become more pronounced. There are lies, damn lies, statistics, and Zach. It will be immigrants who turn out the lights in Connecticut. According to the Hartford Courant:
"Nearly 28,000 more people packed up and moved out of Connecticut than moved in between July 2014 and July 2015, leading to one of the biggest overall population drops by percentage of any state in the nation. But for every three Connecticut residents lost to other states, two were gained from other countries. Overall, Connecticut’s population drop last year was steeper than it was the year before. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates Connecticut’s population on July 1, 2015, was 3,590,886, down 3,876 or about 0.11 percent from July 2014. From 2013 to 2014, the state’s population dipped by 2,664, or 0.07 percent, the first decrease since 2008." jaybird: But for every three Connecticut residents lost to other states, two were gained from other countries.
Because immigrants don't really count. This is consistent with an aging population. Older people move out to be replaced by young workers. QUOTE: Top Clinton Foundation Official: “This Is Not Charity” Quote mine. “The whole concept of this is that the market itself over some period of time is going to deploy all these energy-saving things. The problem is it will happen slowly and gradually.” The foundation hopes to reduce decades to years, and years to months. In other words, you admit this program's purpose is business development rather than charity.
Christopher B: In other words, you admit this program's purpose is business development rather than charity
No. "The practice of quoting out of context (sometimes referred to as "contextomy" and quote mining), is an informal fallacy and a type of false attribution in which a passage is removed from its surrounding matter in such a way as to distort its intended meaning." I like the part where they call it "reinventing philanthropy."
'I will lose credibility with a number of film and Women/Gender studies colleagues.'
I doubt the speaker realizes how ridiculous this sounds to people outside the film/SJW bubble "First Africa-Wide Elephant Census Shows Dropping Populations - Survey confirms the damage wrought by poaching"
How can a "first" census show dropping populations? Don't you need at least two censuses to show a change? Or has math changed in the last 30 years? I thought African elephants were highly damaging to crops.
Kinda like our exploding deer population. JK Brown: How can a "first" census show dropping populations?
It's the first continental survey, but there have been many surveys previous. See the Methods section of Chase et al., Continent-wide survey reveals massive decline in African savannah elephants, PeerJ 2016. Safe spaces 'critical' to student success, college prez says
Yeah. that'll prepare the precious little snowflakes for real life. |