Maggie's Farm

"And at least one commenter on this forum who wants to commit genocide against Muslims."


I don't think that is accurate even though the result would be the same with the accurate description of the problem.

Imagine you are driving along on a slick highway going 75 MPH and your car skids as you enter a right hand turn. Coming towards you is an 18 wheeler and he too is going 75 MPH and you are drifting right towards it. You cannot get control and prevent an accident but you can possibly steer your car off the road into a field of cows. What would you do? Well any sane person would steer towards the steers and save their life and their families life. But then a troll comments that you want to commit genocide against cows. That's not true. You can see what is going to happen and you cannot stop the wreck but you can put yourself and your family first.

That is the world situation today. Some pundits say there may be 30-300 million radical Muslims and the rest will merely support the radicals but won't actually kill anyone. You can see what's coming (well... some people are blind to what's coming) and you would prefer to save yourself, your family, your fellow countrymen and your country. Your choice is to wait until the radical Muslims infiltrate us and acquire nukes, chemical and biological weapons and then attack the West with a vengeance with a resulting WW that kills a billion or two or three people before it's all over. After all if the world is going to wage an NBC (nuclear, biological & chemical) war wouldn't you rather that it take place in the homeland of those who are instigating it? Of course you would unless you are insane or a liberal.

But, but... you say... but then you are committing genocide. Well gee! If a group of people are committed to attack and kill you should you not defend yourself because they are all in some racial/ethnic/religious group and you wouldn't want to be accused of committing genocide? But, but... shouldn't you wait until they actually attack, you could be wrong you know? So again I ask if we are going to have a massive NBC world war wouldn't you rather do it in Northern Africa and the ME??? Why would you want to do it here?

For those of us who see what is coming we are trying to wake up the person who is driving so they can steer us all into the lesser of two bad choices. For those who are smoking pot in the back seat and have no clue what is coming they are saying: DUDE! "... at least one commenter on this forum who wants to commit genocide against Muslims."

I don't think that is accurate. I thought my example spelled it out quite well. Let me put it a different way. Everyone who is paying attention and is aware of what modern weapons of war can do knows that a NBC world war will be deadly to perhaps a billion or two billion people. It is also clear that for Muslims that fear of armageddon is not a deterrent to nuclear war as it was for the nuclear powers for the last 60 plus years. SO we are faced with two possibilities: Wait until the Muslims/terrorists have sufficient NBC weapons to attack the West and suffer terrible losses and perhaps lose the war entirely. OR we could choose to fight and maybe even prevent any of the NBC weapons of mass destruction ever being used AND as a added benefit fight the entire war outside the civilized Western world.

To choose either of these or to not choose and wait and see will bring the same result as you describe i.e. 'mass genocide'. The difference is where the genocidal war is fought and which side is soundly defeated (genocided). So it isn't accurate to say any commenter here "wants" to commit genocide. I suspect they would be overjoyed if all the radical Muslims changed their ways and spent their money and effort on taking care of their own people and not killing Christians. But that option is not one that the West can excercise. Only the radical Muslims can make that choice.

So what's your preference? WW III fought in the West with a billion or so citizens of the West killed or WW III fought in Northern Africa and the ME with a billion or so unrepentant terrorists and their supporters killed?

Absolutely!! Where did genocide get such a bad reputation? You would leave your enemies alive to kill your children??? I want to kill them all and salt their lands.

The thing is you either have signed the suicide pact and will sit quietly waiting (in your case not quietly but trying to convince us all it's raining while you piss on our leg) for it to happen or you refuse to become a victim. I get it! Either out of ignorance or stubbornness you are going to sit and wait for your assigned Jihadist to come cut your head off. I don't want to. I want to take the fight to them. And I don't want to do it by sacrificing our best and brightest in the process. I want to kill them by the thousands from 20,000 feet and send in tanks and troops to finish the job. I want to make their capitol cities glow in the dark so they can be seen from the space station at night. I want to hunt them down where ever they are and send them to their 72 virgins. I want to do this because if we do not they will do it to us.

Who do we blame for fat people?

Genetics pure and simple. It is literally impossible to become morbidly obese unless you are genetically predisposed to become morbidly obese. Some races/ethnicities have a greater genetic propensity to obesity. Most likely a simple result of evolution in a hunt and gather society over melleniums. Societies that converted to an agrarian lifestyle thousands of years ago tend to have less obesity.

The more common issue is simply being overweight by 20-50 lbs especially as we reach and pass middle age. This is simply the body doing what it was engineered to do; store energy during good times to allow a better chance of survival during lean times. It is not difficult to prevent this or reverse it to achieve a 'normal' or desirable weight. But the difference between this and genetic predispostion to obesity is enormous and doesn't even belong in the same discussion.

Is it sugar or carbs or fats that 'cause' being overweight? Absolutely but in exactly the same way these foods cause good health. I doubt you could be healthy if you cut out all fats, sugars and carbs. The food is not toxic it comes down to the amount you consume when contrasted with the calories you burn. As long as you are getting your MDRs eating extra fats and sugars will not hurt you. And as long as you are burning as many calories as you are eating fats, carbs and sugars will not make you fat. simple as that.