Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, June 1. 2015Monday morning linksBoyhood Under Attack: Why Boys Can't Just Be Boys Anymore(Bill Whittle video) Happy Birthday Patrick Henry: "This Constitution is
Don't Ban Trans Fats The guaranteed failure of Bill de Blasio’s plan to help failing schools Average of 102 Climate Models Versus Reality Black Workers Can No Longer Rely on Blue Jobs Mexicans Discover Illegal Immigrants in Cancun, Not Amused Say, Shouldn’t Illegal Aliens Be Given Political Clout? Obama goes after the farmers Deep secrets of racial profiling The cash donations Hillary simply has no answer for The Clintons’ Favorite Way to Lie Forget 9/11, the Latest Airline Horror is a Muslim Woman Who Didn’t Get a Diet Coke Meanwhile in the UK… be sure not to injure your rapist The Islamic Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland THE WORLD SMELLS AMERICAN WEAKNESS North Korean nuclear, missile experts visit Iran Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I am not big on government bans but I am pretty discouraged by the difficulty I experience looking for pure lard that does not contain added partially hydrogenated fats. Read the labels and see if I am not right.
I demand natural fats: lard for deep frying, butter for most everything else and cold pressed vegetables oils for everything else. Re: boys being boys
I agree with the general tenor of the video but I would put more the blame for the destructive treatment of boys on the rising influence of progressive feminism. But there were a couple of things with which I would disagree. One idea floated was that boys don't fit the "Austrian model where you have to sit down, shut up, and do as you're told". There may be better ways to teach boys than that, but that has been the model for schools for hundreds of years and it worked pretty well till the left hijacked the education establishment. I don't think that is really part of the problem. Another idea that was discussed was that there are few male role models in schools today. That was the norm when I was growing up and probably has been the norm for generations. It's not that there were few male teachers, but rather that the female teachers changed due to the progressive, feminist influence. Time was when women knew that boys were supposed to be boys. Now, apparently, they must be something else. Nobody on the video mentioned (yet) the ridiculous education schools in our universities - when I was in college, they were a joke. Kids are now taught by teachers with a masters in education, but they don't learn any better - in fact they don't learn as well - as well as kids used to. Teachers need to be able to impart knowledge (hopefully in multiple and interesting ways) and keep order. Experience from the past forty or fifty years has shown you don't need a degree in education for that. Don't Ban Trans Fats
Wait, I thought acceptance of trans-people was the next big thing, but now they want to ban the fat people who are trans-? [b] City Municipal Bonds--how corrupt are they?[b]
Would the learned folks at MF please provide insight to municipal bonds? I know of at least one example where a bond was put forward (Cincinnati) which the city folks new full well was a fraud--they knew when they created the bond. I would like to have more insight as to the machinations of municipal bonds--any understanding of any angle! How does the mob use them, how corrupt are they--any reasoned and informed thoughts are welcome. Don't often stick up for the Feds but the attack on farmers piece may be a bit over blown. If they really are just trying to clarify the current regulations then that is sorely needed. The current laws are an incoherent mess.
That is a big if, though. And the lack of recess, so they can't burn off the energy accumulating.
Hillary!: MAN! When SALON is piling on, that's another bad sign.
UK Rape: Presume they're going to and hit them first, so they are are fault for hitting you back. Epa and dep already regulate all water (and land)... Ask anyone who has a business or drives a truck (changes oil -possible contamination of a body of water) etc.
These new powers will give them free reign over all commercial and private property. Thanks Donny, that site will be very helpful for me and a good place to start. Now, what can you tell me about gaming the bonds? How does this benefit a corrupt group or individual. How can we monitor the budgets for the projects being built with these funds? Is there any oversight besides the same locals who got the bond passed? It seems pretty holey to me. Get a bond passed, then manage the projects covered by the bond--I dunno smells fishy somehow ;-)
Electronic Municipal Market Access this will give you a start.
Disclosure Obligations of Issuers of Municipal Securities these are securities regulated by the SEC. if you want to game the system, offer unregistered securities (and pay attention to what makes a security registered) and use unaudited financial statements. Try reading a few months back issues of the local paper to see how the various players (council, bond attorneys, bankers/underwriters, bond agents, contractors, retirement boards) all intersect and dine at the same table. Watches are also something to look for in photos of these folks, many tireless servants of the public like Rolex and designer suits.
this is easy. if you don't like munis, don't buy them. if you don't like what you see in the preliminary official statements and official statements or post issue statements, don't buy them. if you can't do your own due diligence, don't buy them. if you don't like the SEC or your own state's blue sky laws, don't buy them. if you think everything is a conspiracy, time to retreat to the bunker.
Thanks again to you both--your info and insights will be very helpful to those of us trying desperately to maintain a sense of fair play and honesty in our small part of the world.
|