We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
"benign neglect unless those morons step on my toes in NYC or anywhere else in the US" is suicidally stupid. Henry Kissinger, on the current events in the Arab Middle East:
In an era of suicide terrorism and proliferating weapons of mass destruction, the drift towards pan-regional sectarian confrontations must be deemed a threat to world stability warranting co-operative effort by all responsible powers, expressed in some acceptable definition of at least regional order.
If order cannot be established, vast areas risk being opened to anarchy and to forms of extremism that will spread organically into other regions. From this stark pattern the world awaits the distillation of a new regional order by America and other countries in a position to take a global view.
It's a good and worthwhile debate. I do respect Kissinger.
My feeling is that there has never been "world order," or "world peace," and never will be. It's a pipe dream and God knows, the USA, benevolently-intentioned as it is, cannot control the world. Cannot and should not. Innocent people will die, as they always have done since the fall of man.
There has been "world order", indeed the Pax Americana, following WWII, and there has not been a "world war" since WWII due to it. There were single-country conflagrationsand fighting but nothing of the magnitude of the violence unabasedlky targeted at all, especially the US, that is happening currently. What is occurring now is genaralizing throughout the MidEast and into noith and central Africa, the Balkans, into Western Europe, and coming soon to the US shores. That is a world war, unless unlike 1936-9, we act forcibly, boldly and bravely now. No more chickening/sickening excuses for inaction. No more ignorance of diplomatic and military history being allowed to make silly assertions.
I would add that European tribes finally settling into borders that they can feel good about - Germans returning to Germany, as a large example - has allowed Europe to become a place of stability and harmony - enough that they like international government more than we do. Immigration in those places may change that, as Englishness and Swedishness erode. But that stability of the wealthiest countries as been a great aid to the Pax Americana.
You're correct, "these bozos are not Attila." Attila could not gain access to weapons of mass destruction that can reach Europe and the US, nor even the missing jetliners from Libya. If he could have, or the Muslims of the Middle Ages, they would have used them.
When these Islamic fascist barbarians ultimately get their hands on a nuclear weapon (as they soon will in this atmosphere of pussfied global leadership) and use it, oh my, stand back for the wringing of hands in agony and regret.
And just remember, after the fact, when the disaster zone is being cleared and the tears have wrung dry, that the only reason what needed to be done wasn't done, was on account of our political class, our "leaders" calculating their future political viability in whether to act or not act, and what the consequences to their careers might be.
How would it look for their careers? They are, ALL-OF-THEM, thinking on that curve right now. Because that's what counts. You know it, and I know it.
Think about how disgusting that is next time one of these phony bastards asks for your support, or grabs a microphone to express to the American people, just how much they are regular-ol'-folks- just-like-us.
The lowlifes are going to use any horrible WMD they ever get on New York City or DC. There's an outside chance they'll use it on LA or San Francisco. I find I am sanguine about the possible uses of terrorist WMD.
It is just like 9/11 and the preceding terrorist strike at New York City. Those people know their enemy and imagine that these cities are our centers of gravity.
We have lots of cities. Maybe Philly is more to their liking? Or Atlanta? Or Miami?
WOW! Incredible near sightedness. What about radiation drift? What about destyruction or very expensive disruption of our commerce and lives, dependent on the big city hubs? What about the huge taxes to rebuild? WQhat about caring about our fellow Americans? What about....?
Ah heck, if you didn't think of these elemental ones, you probably can't think enouigh to add more.
He is not suggesting to exert the level of force to our innercities. You raising that is a red herring to distract from the points. Kissinger is suggesting major force be applied to the MidEast enemies and major international pressure and economic and m ilitary force to pull miscreant states in line. Before the US under Obama abdicated leadership and use of force, other small states were far less likely to behave as extremely as at present and upcoming.