Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Tuesday, January 28. 2014Pete Seeger died
Here's a good obit. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
No, he was a totalitarian monster and a fraud, and his so-called folk music was also a fraud. He should have died 90 years ago, instead he polluted America for decades.
As did all the other so-called folk artists, all of whom were Communist frauds. His songs captured peoples' imaginations, particularly children. I was not a fan, but he was hardly a 'monster'. Just a misguided fellow who was spreading misinformation and lies on behalf of people he thought he could trust.
Naive is the best word to describe him. "Naive"? How about "willfully stupid"? Or, more kindly, "persistent in his folly"?
People like Seeger mean well. They just don't realize the people they are shilling for don't mean well.
I don't think Seeger was a stupid man at all. Misguided and close-minded, sure. He was an idealist of the highest order. He was an example of why Plato felt artists should not be involved in government or governing. Their focus is on the beautiful, which is not something they can ever achieve, as their depiction is merely an imitation of what they perceive. Seeger believed what he perceived to be a very real and integral part of who he was. That's not a bad, immoral, or evil thing. It's just misguided. I'm not a believer in the concept that perception is reality. I believe it's our job, as humans, to sort out the reality and alter our perceptions of what is happening. Seeger felt you had to accept life as it came at you and just enjoy it, and that government should enable and ennoble you to the point of allowing you to enjoy life. That's just terribly naive. Bulldog,
Maybe we have a slantwise disagreement. I know perfectly well that personally kind people can espouse repugnant if not evil political views. I will never forget my shock at finding out that the eminent philosopher Hilary Putnam--brilliant, lucid, and a mensch--was a Maoist back in the day (since changed his mind). I admire his philosophical thinking and find it impossible not to like him personally. However, I disagree strongly that Seeger was an "idealist of the highest order". An idealist believes in the true, the beautiful, and the good. I will grant you that he sought the good as he saw it, and that his songs were sometimes beautiful, even though to the extent that he took interest in politics, his focus was definitely not on the beautiful. However, truth is immutable, and Seeger took orders from Moscow. As Datechguy in his blog notes "Pete Seeger song on involvement in WW 2 before the Nazi’s attacked the USSR: Franklin D, listen to me, You ain’t a-gonna send me ‘cross the sea. You may say it’s for defense That kinda talk ain’t got no sense. Pete Seeger song after Hitler invaded the USSR Now, Mr. President You’re commander-in-chief of our armed forces The ships and the planes and the tanks and the horses I guess you know best just where I can fight … So what I want is you to give me a gun So we can hurry up and get the job done! Coincidence I’m sure." Believing in a cause or in something bigger than yourself is not really idealism; it's just power worship. Seeger willingly believed in the Party's politically expedient version of truth, you know, the Orwellian sense of 2+2=5. Respectfully, gpc31 Bulldog,
One might be simultaneously intelligent, well-meaning and naïve briefly, but not for decades and not in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Seeger felt you had to accept life as it came at you and just enjoy it... Yes, of course, tell that to the victims of Seeger's pantheon of murderers like Stalin, Che, Ho and Mao. I'll extend Pete Seeger all the mercy and compassion afforded others by the aforementioned barbaric savages. Don't forget: Seegar condemned FDR's entry into WW2...that is...until Hitler invaded Stalin's USSR. Then, Seegar switch sides, and demanded that the US jump in to defend his beloved Soviet Union. I hope he burns in hell.
the German invasion of Russia started in June, 1941.
the US entered WW2 in December, 1941. so what, exactly, are you blathering about? I know its chic here to trash anyone who doesn't buy into a kind of fairy-tale version of the USA, but, holy crap, get your facts straight. In May 1941, the Almanac Singers, which included Pete Seeger, published "Songs For John Doe," which were against intervention in WW2.
According to Wiki, QUOTE: On June 22, 1941, Hitler broke the non-aggression pact and attacked Communist Russia, and Keynote promptly destroyed all its inventory of Songs for John Doe. There is a posting from Solomonia, which supports the Wiki quote about taking the "Songs From John Doe" album off the market.QUOTE: At that point, I raised my hand and asked him the following question: "Professor Zinn, in May of 1941 your friend, Pete Seeger, produced an album called Songs for John Doe which was a collection of blue collar songs that included one called The Ballad of October 16th. [At the time, Pete Seeger had formed his first commercial band called the Almanac Singers.] That song demonstrated yours and Pete's pacifist philosophy by excoriating Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt for urging United States entry into World War II to fight Hitler. Shortly after the album's release, you and Pete were desperately trying to retrieve all the copies to take them out of circulation. Exactly what happened between May and June of 1941 to turn you from devoted anti-war activists into sabre-rattling patriots, resulting in your enlisting in the Army Air Force as a bombardier?" As Zinn did not deny the statement that he and Pete Seeger tried to get copes of the "Songs for John Doe" albums out of circulation this would indicate to me that yes, he and Pete Seeger did try to take the "Songs for John Doe" albums out of circulation. It would also support the Wiki quote about Keynote destroying the albums.An angry, bemused pall fell over the room. Someone next to me growled, "Who are you?" A lengthy silence from Professor Zinn finally ended in a muted response: "Well, we've all made mistakes in our lives." He was referring, of course, to his oft-stated repudiation of his role in World War II as a "death dealer" from on high. I decided to fill in the rest for the stunned audience. "What you mean is that on June 22, 1941, your country was invaded. And by that, I mean the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. On that date over a million German soldiers poured across the border in what was to prove the largest military aggression in history. Suddenly, Roosevelt became your hero because he was now Stalin's ally. It seems that pacifism has its limits, even for you. And that's how you went from orthodox pacifist to imperialist war monger." Silence from the Professor. Shouts and threats from the audience. I began to move to the exit. I escaped. There is a timely footnote [14] in the Wiki article which leads to a review by Time Magazine for "Talking Union," an album which the Almanac Singers released in September, 1941. QUOTE: Smartest users of music to make political points are the Almanac Singers, four young men who roam around the country in a $150 Buick and fight the class war with ballads and guitars. Their recorded collection Songs for John Doe, ably hewed to the then Moscow line, neatly phonograph-needled J. P. Morgan, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and particularly war (TIME, June 16). The three discs of Talking Union, on sale last week under the Keynote label, lay off the isolationist business now that the Russians are laying it on the Germans. Did the Almanac Singers/Pete Seeger change their views after June 22,1941, when Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, and before December 7,1941, when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor? This documentation points towards yes. 3.2 got his mitt in the wringer by either not knowing when the US entered WW2 or when Germany invaded Russia. his words: "Seegar condemned FDR's entry into WW2 ... ." in artfully put, true, but that means December, 1941. Seeger might have moved away from isolationism in June '41, but that's not what 3.2 said.
a small part of the US supported or was sympathetic to the nazis or commies, most of the population was isolationist during the run up to Pearl Harbor, a problem that dogged FDR.
#3.2.1.1.1
wirraway
on
2014-01-28 17:48
(Reply)
Do not forget that FDR pushed for and got Lend-Lease passed in March, 1941. Lend-Lease by it's very nature exposed the US to the same sort of pressures to enter the war as the earlier, similar situation demonstrated with the sinking of the Lusitania. Even though the Kriegsmarine was doing its best to avoid hitting American flagged ships prior to Dec 8, 1941, another Lusitania type incident was practically inevitable.
But I thought you guys think liberals loved fascism. What's this about Seeger opposing Hitler? And what's this business about Seeger supporting civil rights and marching with Martin Lither King? I,thought that was supposed to be a Republican thing?
Good grief! The guy was an old Commie geezer who never found an enemy of this country he couldn't find a way to support.
He championed the Soviets (you might remember them) during the"nuclear freeze" in the 80's and was an outspoken liar and propagandist about the motives of Ronald Reagan, one of the finest American's who ever swore the office of President. Obummer probably had to bite his lip and choke back a tear. Pete Seeger was a flawed and complicated guy, both charming and repugnant. He sure had the life long commitment to agitating for far left measures for those he never really could relate to, except in an academic or anthropological sense, he was more fallen upper crust like a lot of old time Quakers, never a man of the people.
His singing style reflected his hectoring views, but he did have a sense of taste and discovery among various folk traditions, he was generous in bringing obscure musicians to wider audiences. While his politics were distasteful at best, often disgraceful, I know people who met him who found him to be a kind and decent sort at the personal and individual level. Like so many of his ilk, he was blind to or stubbornly indifferent to evil at levels beyond interpersonal interactions. He sure leaves a very mixed legacy, but then to some extent we all do, even if we do not become apologists for extreme evil as Pete did. One wonders, had he been a citizen of the USSR, how his music would have been received in the 1950s? Would they have embraced it or sent him packing to a gulag?
I can only speculate people like Seeger are incapable of introspection and analytical thinking. In the song, 'If I had a Hammer" there is a passage that reads: Well, I've got a hammer and I've got a bell and I've got a song to sing all over this land It's the hammer of justice It's the bell of freedom How does a person rationalize believing in freedom and justice with a form of totalitarian government which believes in neither? incapable of introspection and analytical thinking....I'd put Jane Fonda in the same class.
I'm not sure I would. I don't know but I don't think I Seeger would gleefully cheer enemy soldiers who were trying to kill our soldiers or rat out POWs who wanted to get a message home to their captors.
But then, maybe he would in which case let him rot in hell. did he do that during his wartime service in the Army? trashing someone with made up fantasies is even lamer than the guy who thinks the US got into WW2 before the Germans invaded Russia.
Useful Idiot: A niave and innocent commie.
I liked his music, I disliked watching him on NPR specials where he would speak his left wing commie blather. But it was different from Jane Fonda in that I cannot watch her, hear her or go to her movies. She could make a pro U.S. movie (now that will never happen) and I still couldn't watch it because she would be in it. Probably because I spent 20 years in the military during the entire Vietnam war. I largely agree with your succinct estimation of Pete Seeger. He did come across as an innocent, childlike waif of a dreamer. Idealistic people are not evil. His music was nice and his concern for his fellow human beings was certainly real. Let's not hate on the dreamers among us. Let us instead pause for a moment and take a sip from that unrealistic loving cup and pretend we can do better. I mean, it couldn't hurt any of us to be dreamers for a little while. I will miss that old fool. That lovable, idealistic, unrealistic, misguided old fool. Rest in peace Pete. Now, let's liberate Cuba and let those enslaved people breath the same freedom Pete enjoyed. Call me a dreamer if you like but I really mean it, Cuba must be liberated!
Too bad Joseph Goebbels didn't play the banjo and sing folk songs - he could then have been referred to as a "likeable old nazi" when he died. Communism is an evil of the same magnitude as Naziism.
That Seeger supported it as a propagandist is an everlasting black mark. I don't believe he was naiïve, and he certainly wasn't innocent. An enabler.
The worst of the worst. “Thou shalt not be a victim, thou shalt not be a perpetrator, but, above all, thou shalt not be a bystander.” ― Yehuda Bauer Bauer forgot the enabler ... At Shorpy, in a post titled, 'Little Pete: 1921', a photograph with the caption, "Professor Charles Louis Seeger and family." Charles Seeger, wife Constance de Clyver Edson and their 2-year-old son Pete, of future folkie fame."
http://www.shorpy.com/node/5689 he was a great musician and a political dissenter -- a constitutional right of his not to fall in lockstep with the True American Patriots on this forum. he also served honorably in WW2 and was a victim of McCarthyism which I also suspect many here approve of.
he was a great musician and a political dissenter
He was a "political dissenter" who, back in the day, changed his "dissenting" views in in accordance with what Uncle Joe and the Cominterm would have deemed appropriate at the time. Before June 22 1941: against US involvement in WW2. After June 22 1941: for US involvement in WW2. "Dissent," my foot. You see him as a "dissenter." I see him as a Stalinist toady ,changing his views in accordance with what Uncle Joe and the Cominterm would have deemed appropriate at the time. That over a half century after Stalin's death, Pete Seeger admitted that Uncle Joe wasn't the greatest thing since sliced bread is an admission that came way too late. he... was a victim of McCarthyism which I also suspect many here approve of. Some people refer to "McCarthyism" as falsely accusing someone of being a Communist. I find such false accusations reprehensible. Others refer to "McCarthyism" as publicizing someone's truthful Communist affiliations. As Pete Seeger was not only a Communist, but also actively supported the Soviet Union, this is apparently the "McCarthyism" you refer to. I, for one, support this kind of "McCarthyism." My hometown had too many people who had fled the Iron Curtain for me to have a benign view of those Americans who were Communists and actively supported and defended the Soviet Union- as Pete Seeger did. [No, I am not referring to his service time in WW2.] Recall that many of those who denounced "McCarthyism" back in the 1950s also believed Alger Hiss was innocent. Which he wasn't, as the courts decided and as Weinstein's book showed several decades later. Which shows that those who cried proclaimed Hiss to be innocent were either liars or damned fools. I see he really got under your skin.
at least you got the dates right on the german invasion of russia. he was an isolationist -- like a heavy percentage of americans at the time: QUOTE: In January 1938, Rep. Louis Ludlow, an Indiana Democrat, proposed a constitutional amendment strongly supported by the public: "Except in the event of an invasion of the United States or its territorial possessions and attack upon its citizens residing therein, the authority of Congress to declare war shall not become effective until confirmed by a majority of all votes cast thereon in a nationwide referendum." Although narrowly defeated, 209-188, it might have passed without President Franklin Roosevelt's last-minute opposition. http://articles.courant.com/2013-09-20/news/hc-op-will-isolationism-before-wwwii-0923-20130920_1_world-war-ii-interventions-sargent-shriver so he was a commie. so what? at a time when it was also chic to support national socialism and hitler's support of franco. what did he do you you or anyone? murder someone? steal atomic secrets? sabotage the war effort? dodge the draft? betray POWS (as someone posits), write bad music? this is not a rhetorical question. he wrote popular music that you don't like and espoused political beliefs you disagree with an you're acting like he poisoned your dog... ... unless you're telling me the first amendment doesn't protect freedom to dissent and are asserting mccarthyism was a good idea -- which I think you are, even if you're not willing to admit it. so he was a commie. so what? at a time when it was also chic to support national socialism and hitler's support of franco.
So what? I refer you to "Gulag Archipelago." If YOU had known any refugees from the Iron Curtain, as I did growing up, I doubt that you would have had such a casual "so what" attitude. Growing up, I also knew refugees from Hitler. what did he do you you or anyone? murder someone? steal atomic secrets? sabotage the war effort? dodge the draft?...this is not a rhetorical question. Pete Seeger didn't "dodge the draft," but he did write a song against the draft, which certainly would have encouraged "dodging the draft." I refer you to "C For Conscription." QUOTE: Well it's C for Conscription, Pete Seeger certainly didn't advocate dodging the draft after June,22 1941. He could change his beliefs on a dime, which is why I have contempt for him. C for Capitol Hill. C for Conscription, C for Capitol Hill. Hey, hey, hey And it's C for the Congress That passed that goddamn bill. Yodellayee Yeow! hoo, hoo, hoo, hoo. I'd rather be at home, Even sleeping in a holler log, I'd rather be here home, Even sleeping in a holler log. Than go to the army And be treated like a dirty dog! Yodellayee Yeow! hoo, hoo, hoo, hoo. I am reminded of the commie Dalton Trumbo, who wrote two anti-war books before the invasion of the Soviet Union: Johnny Got His Gun and The Remarkable Andrew. After the invasion of the Soviet Union, Trumbo suspended publishing Johnny Got His Gun and when he received letters from conscientious objectors seeking his support, turned the letters into the FBI. As I was a 1-O during the Vietnam War, I have contempt for someone who can so quickly shed pacifist views. I did change my views on pacifism, but it took nearly a decade. I would suggest that you define more carefully what you mean by "McCarthyism." See my above posting. the iron curtain is a cold war term. the conditions in the USSR and in nazi germany were not well understood by Americans in '35 the way they would be in '50.
that anti-draft song was published before WW2, and probably represented the sentiments a heavy percentage of the citizens who did not want to get involved in a European war. There was not illegal about expressing anti-draft sentiments at that time, and apparently the US government didn't consider it worth the effort of withdrawing it from publication after the US got involved. regardless -- what, exactly, did this anti-draft song do to harm the US? if all we're talking about is your person sense of disgust at his change of opinion, that's cool, but there's nothing to discuss, its your opinion. mccarthyism ... I'm using this in this sense: the FBI investigations "crushed" (according to the billboard article cited) the Almanac Singers and the FBI and the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee investigations got the Weavers blacklisted. http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/5885501/pete-seeger-dead-legendary-folk-singer-activist-dies-94 so let me ask again, what crimes did he commit? did he murder someone? steal atomic secrets? sabotage the war effort? dodge the draft? was he a war criminal? I'm asking this because this is the reverse of the coin I see here every single day. the IRS is targeting conservatives, the NSA/FEMA/Justice Department is destroying people for political dissent .... if you're not utterly disgusted about all of this abuse of political power, from both sides, then this country is doomed. and I wouldn't be quick to trash COs, either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desmond_Doss
#10.1.1.1.1
wirraway
on
2014-01-28 18:23
(Reply)
the iron curtain is a cold war term. the conditions in the USSR and in nazi germany were not well understood by Americans in '35 the way they would be in '50.
For those who were interested, there was a fair amount of contemporary coverage of the 1938 Moscow show trials in the US. Dewey Commission and all that. Those who wanted to become informed could have informed themselves- especially those from an intellectual background, such as Pete Seeger. Many did inform themselves about the show trials- Pete's father included. [see link @ "In Pete Seeger's own words."] regardless -- what, exactly, did this anti-draft song do to harm the US? You asked for evidence about Pete Seeger's "dodging the draft." I accordingly provided evidence that Pete Seeger wrote and sang a song that was against the draft, and therefore implicitly was advocating dodging the draft. You have a problem with my providing evidence you asked for? Most likely the only harm done was to Pete Seeger's integrity. if all we're talking about is your person sense of disgust at his change of opinion, that's cool, but there's nothing to discuss, its your opinion. The point is that like Dalton Trumbo in his anti-war books, Seeger took a stance that didn't reflect what he thought was right, but what the current party line was. That reflects a lack of personal integrity. This accusation is much more strongly directed at Dalton Trumbo than at Pete Seeger, but it still stands. In Pete Seeger's words: QUOTE: "Innocently I became a member of the Communist Party, and when they said fight for peace, I did, and when they said fight Hitler, I did." By Pete Seeger's own admission, he changed his opinion to fit the party line. You have no problem with that?and I wouldn't be quick to trash COs, either. I don't understand where that is coming from. After all, I wrote "I have contempt for someone who can so quickly shed pacifist view," which doesn't trash pacifists but those who quickly shed their pacifism. As I pointed out, I was a CO [in draft status terms: 1-O]. My disgust was with a "pacifist" like Dalton Trumbo [read comments], who quickly changed his opinions on pacifism in tandem with what would fit the current party line. mccarthyism ... I'm using this in this sense: the FBI investigations "crushed" (according to the billboard article cited) the Almanac Singers and the FBI and the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee investigations got the Weavers blacklisted. When Pete Seeger was a member of the Almanac Singers, he was earning money while advocating publicly on behalf of an organization -the CPUSA-that was a tool of a foreign power, the Soviet Union. [See the above quote.] By advocating what the CPUSA told him to- which he admitted to in the above quote- Pete Seeger was advocating on behalf of a foreign power. As I see it, that is why he ran into problems. Not to mention his being a member. so let me ask again, what crimes did he commit? I don't understand why you are asking that question. For a substantial part of his life, Pete Seeger's principles were whatever the CPUSA told him they were. That is what disgusts me about Pete Seeger. Lack of integrity may not be a crime, but it is good reason for disgust. I'm asking this because this is the reverse of the coin I see here every single day. the IRS is targeting conservatives, the NSA/FEMA/Justice Department is destroying people for political dissent .... if you're not utterly disgusted about all of this abuse of political power, from both sides, then this country is doomed. One difference is that conservatives are not advocating on behalf of a foreign power, as Pete Seeger did. But yes, it is a problem.
#10.1.1.1.1.1
Gringo
on
2014-01-29 00:26
(Reply)
In Pete Seeger's words: wrong footnote
note 31 ^ He later commented "Innocently I became a member of the Communist Party, and when they said fight for peace, I did, and when they said fight Hitler, I did. I got out in ’49, though.... I should have left much earlier. It was stupid of me not to. My father had got out in ’38, when he read the testimony of the trials in Moscow, and he could tell they were forced confessions. We never talked about it, though, and I didn’t examine closely enough what was going on.... I thought Stalin was the brave secretary Stalin, and had no idea how cruel a leader he was." Wilkinson, "The Protest Singer" (2006), p. 52; see also The Protest Singer: An Intimate Portrait (2009), p. 114.
#10.1.1.1.1.1.1
Gringo
on
2014-01-30 13:19
(Reply)
I'm reasonably certain I can listen to Mr. Wagner's operas without being Nazi or condoning fascism. I'm just as certain I can listen to Mr. Seeger's work, (and appreciate what a boost he gave folk music) without being a communist or condoning communism.
Yes you can.
One can also like the music and not the performer or the originator. False analogy. Wagner was neither a Nazi nor a Fascist, nor a fascist. Kicking the bucket in 1883 kinda puts the kibosh on your equivalence.
Seeger, on the other hand, WAS a Communist. Bird Dog: Grew up middle class, went to prep school and Harvard.
Pete Seeger's middle class is not my middle class. The only thing that makes an old commie a good commie? About 6' of dirt!
I handled hundreds of signals to all parts of the Soviet Union which were couched in the following form: "To N.K.V.D., Frunze. You are charged with the task of exterminating 10,000 enemies of the people. Report results by signal.--Yezhov." And in due course the reply would come back: "In reply to yours of such-and-such date, the following enemies of the Soviet people have been shot." ----Former Soviet Spy-Chief Vladimir Petrov Forgive my not being very PC in this PC world, but I still carry a lot of Chicom steel in many parts of my body! |