Maggie's Farm

You are rationalizing. Let's assume what you say is true and the AGW is still on track and the 90's simply had a warmer blip (which the warmies took advatage of I migfht add to bouy up their theory). The point you are ignoring and the elephant in the room is that for the last 15 years the dreaded poisonous gas CO2 has continued it's meteoric rise and the temperature did not follow. This goes against everything the warmies have said. This is huge! It blows away the CO2 link to the AGW theory. Without the CO2 as the cause then burning fossil fuel cannot logically be linked to global warming ( I say cannot logically be linked because I recognize logic has no place in the AGW community). Without fossil fuel being the cause of global warming then there is no longer a viable AGW theory; something else, something not related to human action must be causing this tiny increase in global temperatures.

But no worries. There is good news. The increased CO2 is causing increased plant growth even greening former arid areas and saving the Amazon not to mention providing more food for the growing population. And the slightly warmer climate is a boon to mankind, improving living conditions, improving health and in general beneficial to all peoples. Polar bears are thriving in spite of the attempts by the crazy left to deny it. Let's not forget that the little ice age caused the dark ages and allowed the great plagues to decimate the human populations. This is so much better then encroaching glaciers and summers without harvests, don'tcha think???

You are now embarassing yourself. Remember that CO2 is SOOO powerful that it wamred the entire planet and doomed civilization forever. It is not just the prime factor in AGW it is the ONLY factor. The all powerful CO2. But wait! But wait! for the last 15 years CO2 has continued it's inexorable rise year after year and the rise in temperature stopped dead in it's tracks!!! How can that be; oh the horror, the humanity. CO2 has lost it's power. But did it ever have the power. Where those hundreds of sceintists who claime the increase in CO2 was the result of warming and not the cause? Does CO2 really have very little effect on climate DUH!, no warming the last 15 years, DUH! Was it all really about those pesky Milankovitch cycles after all and not about fossil fuel? Was the hoopla all about grants and funding for scientists and taxes and power for politicians? DUH!

More rationalization. You are so inept at deceit that I truely think you should get into some other carear. Either CO2 CAUSES global warming which is the AGW keystone or it does not. You cannot claim the meteoric rise in temperature during the 30's was the result of increased CO2 and then discard all the evidence when in the 60's and 70's global cooling is so obvious that famous scientists declared we were entering a ice age (conveniently that too was somehow caused by man).

AGW is a theory! There is zero evidence to support it, it is nothing more then a theory. It's hingepin is increasing CO2 causing increasing warming. Yet, the increase in CO2 is unabated and the warming has stopped COLD. Once again famous and not so famous scientists are predicting an ice age or at least global cooling and yet CO2 keeps increasing. The increasing CO2 is greening deserts and saving the Amazon. It is increasing crop yields just as population increases demand increased crop yields. There seems to be no downside to the increased CO2 and the tight relationship with global warming is broken. The AGW theory is still unproven. But the warmies continue to prevaricate and postulate and blame ever precipitate on humans. Why? Well, duh, for the money, for the power, for the increased tax revenue, for the children (oops that's the teachers unions, sorry).

I have a theory. Not as popular as the AGW theory but it does have exactly as much evidence to support it. I think global warming is caused by the growth in the federal government. After all every year the size and cost of the federal government has increased just as the warming has. I have even charted this over the last hundred years and the chart contains that characteristic "hockey stick" appearance we all know and love. By george I think I have something here. The only way to save humanity is to fire 10% of the federal civilian workforce AND to further decrease the budget for each department by 10% (and reduce taxes by 10%) and to do this every year until the ice caps return. Lets hit the politicians with a hockey stick and see if we can fix this problem.

More deflection and distraction. You know CO2 was blamed for AGW and the references to methane, nitrous oxide or ozone were foot notes. CO2 was the biggy but now that CO2 has let you down you conflate the eensey weensey amounts of other naturally occurring gasses as having been co-conspiritors in this AGW conspiracy. As for water vapor, DUH! That's what the deniers have been claiming all along that water vapor and not AGW is the biggest factor in this natural cyclical and very minor global warming.

By the way you are slipping you forgot to cite any references and "et al"s to booster your position. Don't forget that in the future it makes your reply's look professional and helps distract from the lack of proof.