More marriage confusion

Categories

Query failed:

SELECT  c.categoryid,
                           c.category_name,
                           c.category_icon,
                           c.category_description,
                           c.authorid,
                           c.category_left,
                           c.category_right,
                           c.parentid,

                           a.username,
                           a.username AS loginname,
                           a.realname
                      FROM csg_category AS c
           LEFT OUTER JOIN csg_authors AS a
                        ON c.authorid = a.authorid
           LEFT OUTER JOIN csg_authorgroups AS ag
                        ON ag.authorid = c.authorid
           LEFT OUTER JOIN csg_access AS acl
                        ON (ag.groupid = acl.groupid AND acl.artifact_id = c.categoryid)
                           
                           GROUP BY c.categoryid
 ORDER BY category_name ASC

/ Got error 28 from storage engine

All categories

Quicksearch

Blog Administration

Open login screen

RSS Readers

Thursday, March 28. 2013

If marriage is primarily a legal contract, then why can't two elderly sisters marry? It might very well be to their advantage, and they may love eachother deeply. Or does marriage have to involve sex? If so, who from the government is going to check to make sure that sex is happening? God knows, the world is full of sexless marriages.

And, yes, what about polygamy? Why not? It's not Christian but it is Old Testament Jewish and it is modern (quietly) Mormon - and Islam. How many wives did David have? I read that Solomon had 200 wives and 800 concubines, or maybe the other way around. I do not know when the Israelites gave up polygamy.

The whole topic becomes more and more absurd and confusing as cultural traditions are undermined. Gays can get married while the heterosexual people are now up to 50% childbirth out of wedlock. Crazy world. It's called cultural change.

Then I noticed this: Kagan ’09: ‘There Is No Constitutional Right To Same-Sex Marriage’. That statement signifies to me that she is an unwise person. The Constitution does not set up government to dole out rights to the people, but rather to protect the mostly-unlimited rights of a free people. But I am repeating myself.

Freedom and privacy require no "penumbra." Back to the US Constitution, the American social contract:

This list of rights should not be read to limit in any way any other rights of the people.

The powers not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited by the Constitution to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

Posted by Dr. Joy Bliss at 16:05 | Comments (35) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

PingBack

Weblog: dailybrowse.wordpress.com
Tracked: Mar 29, 16:30

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

No comments

Add Comment

Name
Email	(Your e-mail will not show in your comment)
Homepage
In reply to
Comment	By commenting on this site you agree to the site rules listed here. Email addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for email notifications. Quick reference guide: [i] italics [/i], [b] bold [/b], [u] underline [/u], [url] (web address) [/url]. More tips here. Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (word), underscore are made via _word_. E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications. To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly. Enter the string from the spam-prevention image above: BBCode format allowed
	Remember Information? Subscribe to this entry

Maggie's Farm

Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page