Obama Vs. Little Sisters of the Poor

Categories

Query failed:

SELECT  c.categoryid,
                           c.category_name,
                           c.category_icon,
                           c.category_description,
                           c.authorid,
                           c.category_left,
                           c.category_right,
                           c.parentid,

                           a.username,
                           a.username AS loginname,
                           a.realname
                      FROM csg_category AS c
           LEFT OUTER JOIN csg_authors AS a
                        ON c.authorid = a.authorid
           LEFT OUTER JOIN csg_authorgroups AS ag
                        ON ag.authorid = c.authorid
           LEFT OUTER JOIN csg_access AS acl
                        ON (ag.groupid = acl.groupid AND acl.artifact_id = c.categoryid)
                           
                           GROUP BY c.categoryid
 ORDER BY category_name ASC

/ Got error 28 from storage engine

All categories

Quicksearch

Blog Administration

Open login screen

RSS Readers

Wednesday, December 19. 2012

Obama Vs. Little Sisters of the Poor

During college I worked at Jack Frost Dry Goods, a fabric and yarn store in Bedford-Stuyvesant. The owner contributed extra cloth to the Little Sisters of the Poor in the nearby Bushwick neighborhood. My uncle had owned a nursing home in the Bronx when I was much younger than that, and the Little Sisters facility and care was superior.

The Little Sisters of the Poor are another example of religious based charitable organizations whose scruples and finances would be violated by Obamacare's requirement that it provide medical insurance that includes contraception and medical treatments that cause sterility or can cause abortions. Aside from its 300 sisters working in their facilities, non-users but still charged for the increased premium, the Little Sisters hires without regard to religion and cares for people without regard to religion. So, according to Obamacare, the Little Sisters of the Poor does not qualify for exemption.

Operating on the principles that are inherent in their religion and such work for the poor and operating on very thin margins, Medicaid providing half the costs of quality care, the Little Sisters of the Poor may have to cease operations in the United States. As the Daily Caller reports from Sister Constance Carolyn Veit:

“[A]s Little Sisters of the Poor, we are not strangers to religious intolerance,” she wrote. “Our foundress was born at the height of the French Revolution and established our congregation in its aftermath. Our sisters have been forced to leave numerous countries, including China, Myanmar and Hungary, because of religious intolerance. We pray that the United States will not be added to this list.”

As a Jew, and as an American, I find outrageous this destructive intrusion into overriding faith and good works. Congress has not corrected this, but the courts may yet:

Yesterday’s ruling marks the second time in two weeks that a judge has decided that Obama’s promise to change the rule eventually is an insufficient remedy to the religious liberty issues raised by opponents of the mandate.

Posted by Bruce Kesler at 12:31 | Comments (7) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks

Trackback specific URI for this entry

PingBack