Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, October 17. 2012Hypocrisy Among Pro-BDS ProfessorsThe claimed respect held by an organization of Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) anti-Israel California professors toward academic freedom and open exchange of views is contradicted by their actual activities and speech. On November 6, the electorate of California will vote on whether to increase their taxes, against the threat by Governor Brown that the state’s severe deficits will otherwise have to be made up by cuts to education funding. The letter from California Scholars For Academic Freedom and the facts behind it do not argue for taxpayers increasing their taxes in order to fund abusers and deniers of academic freedom. Thirty-five of the 134 California Scholars For Academic Freedom (CSAF) wrote to each member of the California State Assembly denouncing their unanimous passing of House Resolution 35. As they say:
In a telling twist of illogic, they assert: “HR-35 itself is fundamentally anti-semitic because it associates and conflates with Judaism an unending list of well-documented racist policies and crimes against humanity committed by the state of Israel." The actual respect held for academic freedom is exhibited by one of the 35 signers, Jess Ghannam, a Palestinian clinical professor and the Chief of Medical Psychology at the University of California, San Francisco. He was taped and quoted at a March 2010 meeting enthusiastic about the students who interrupted the Israel Ambassador's talk at University of California, Irvine:
Another signer, Susan Slyomovics, is a professor at UCLA’s Center for Near Eastern Studies (CNES). Here’s her participation in a 2009 CNES event:
One could go on about the disrespect for academic freedom or the speech rights of advocates for Israel or dispassionate commenters, but if the above two examples aren’t enough, the California professors at AMCHA Initiative have described the activities of the others, naming names and offenses. In a counter-letter (read it all) to the members of the California Assembly, they write:
Another example is David Delgado Shorter, a professor of World Arts and Cultures/Dance at UCLA. Shorter has been using his official UCLA class website for the purpose of promoting the academic and cultural boycott of Israel. The regulations of the University of California specifically state that university websites are not to be used for political purposes outside the course content. Other California public college professors similarly abuse their website. The veil is indeed thin behind which abusers and deniers of academic freedom hide to foster their anti-Israel, and anti-semitic, views at the public expense. Taxpayers may take this into account when voting on November 6, to the detriment of the entire University of California and California State College systems and their students.
Posted by Bruce Kesler
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
16:32
| Comments (10)
| Trackbacks (0)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Perhaps your browser. I constantly have trouble with this blog's software, and it varies with the browser I use at the time. But, we exist at the charity of the webmaster. Try reading this post with another browser. Hope you can.
The font your comment uses is as if you're shouting. We shouldn't have to change browsers to read your comments when the others come in OK. Please make an effort to conform with the other writers. Thank you.
I don't have a clue what you are talking about. It is the same as other writers in both AOL's and IE's browser. In Chrome's it is one 2-pts larger, hardly screaming. What browser are you using?
The font looks big on Firefox and Chrome, too.
#1.1.1.1.1
jdgjtr
on
2012-10-17 22:08
(Reply)
Not so.
When I draft I do so in Word. I import various fonts for quotes or for footnotes for me. Then I convert all, within Word, to the blog's font. Then copy-and-paste to the blog software. Then, to be sure block and impose the blog's font. Nonetheless, the blog software does not obey all the font instructions. Also, depending on the reader's browser the post may appear differently, and differently among browsers. Then, furthermore, when adding to the post within the blog software, it may appear OK in the blog Preview, but depending on the reader's browser will often appear differently, and differently among browsers. I've never had these problems with other blog software. I cannot compose within the blog software because I often work on a post for hours or days, and the blog software often times out and eliminates a post or part of it, and also does not accomodate my footnote research, and the blog format is not appealing for drafting. Some may use Notepad, but I never have, it is outmoded, and lacks many functionalities. So, live with it, as I must.
#1.1.1.2.1
Bruce Kesler
on
2012-11-13 20:21
(Reply)
For whatever it's worth:
The font on this post does seem larger than other posts. (opening up in IE or Firefox does not make a difference for me on my old XP machine) While it seems a bit odd being larger, it is still readable for me. Just FYI. I'm running Google Chrome 22.0.1229.94 m, the most current. This posting - but not the comments - appears to be about 16 point text, even though the style specifies 10. The characters that extend above and below lines actually touch the characters in the adjacent line. The same thing happens in IE 9. I'm running XP with all the patches and service packs.
To the content - well, this is what's to be expected. It's a public university, but it's filled with people who think that the advanced degrees they hold and the academic positions they've attained means that they are more intelligent and more moral than the rest of us and that they are entitled to impose those judgments on the people who pay their salaries. They also think that they should not be accountable to the public. Government officials are supposed to be overseeing them, but since elected and appointed government officials tend to hold the exact same attitudes towards those they rule, such oversight is ineffective. |
Tracked: Oct 17, 18:39
Tracked: Oct 17, 18:39
Tracked: Oct 17, 18:39
Tracked: Oct 17, 18:39
Tracked: Oct 17, 18:39
Tracked: Oct 17, 18:40
Tracked: Oct 17, 18:40