Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, April 11. 2012Weds. morning linksDocument Deep Dive: How the Homestead Act Transformed America The suicide forest of Japan: Mount Fuji beauty spot where up to 100 bodies are found every year Tasty beer: Great Achievements in American Capitalism Transgressive Art Shocks Educators But I thought the current pomo view of art was to disturb the complacent. Guess not. Thomas Kinkade, detested by the bien pensant But I thought the current pomo view of art was to disturb the complacent. Guess not. Joel Stein Has Four Accountants
Related: The Cure for Humanity's Natural State of Abject Poverty - A review of Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. The non-diverse Obama campaign HQ Sowell: Why Politicians Promise Heaven And Deliver Hell:
It's a truism that recipients of charity must always hate the giver. It's about pride. Has the Trayvon Martin incident become more about the media than the shooting? Yes University Course on How to Impose Communism No wonder colleges are so greedy Mojave Solar Project Killing Threatened Desert Tortoises Understanding the Resilience of Monarchy During the Arab Spring Obama's America: Why Black Grievance Will Never End Why I Called George Zimmerman a Murderer, and Why I Was Wrong - I won't get fooled by media again. Nearly 60 percent of Americans would move from their communities right now if they could, according to a new survey Everybody's got to be somewhere... Hospital Refuses To Hire Overweight People From what I hear, overweight people are always at an employment disadvantage Here's How Unpopular ObamaCare Is: Fewer Than Half of Democrats Want the Law Upheld Hmmm. NASA Scientists Rebel Against Global Warming Hysteria:
Hansen has lost it, and his colleagues finally are daring to admit it. Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Kinkade's "art" was gawd awful. Greeting card illustration sold with hucksterist disregard of the consuming public. Which, I must admit, sucked it up like pixiestix.
QUOTE: NASA Scientists Rebel Against Global Warming Hysteria The majority of the "49 former NASA scientists and astronauts" who signed the letter are actually engineers and managers, including those involved in Space Shuttle Structures, Flight Operations Integration, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering, Chief Materials Division and Quality Assurance. Yes, people who will go to jail if they do shoddy science or permit it to infect their programs.
Engineers are not a valid appeal to authority on scientific questions. The article was misleading by referring to them as scientists. Though a few were scientists, most were engineers.
This is reminiscent of Project Steve. For the most part, the signatories are not scientists, 'tis true, but as engineers they understand very well the methodology and process that needs to be applied to the science of global warming. They do not dispute the climate models. Rather, they say that theoretical models are no substitute for empirical data. The science will be settled when the empirical data say it is settled, not when a theoretical model says it is.
The main point of this letter will be missed by most people, I think. Absent the recent publicity generated by the global warmists at GISS, the vast majority of NASA employees at its various research centers around the country barely know that GISS is a part of NASA. And so, when a few employees at a tiny, almost insignificant outpost of NASA begin to speak for the entire agency and drag it into a huge controversy in a way that threatens the reputation of the rest of the agency, including the engineering groups and the manned space flight operations, other NASA employees and its former employees have a right to express their concern. GISS is a case of the tail wagging the dog. Some people are mighty upset about that. They should be. Agent Cooper: For the most part, the signatories are not scientists, 'tis true, but as engineers they understand very well the methodology and process that needs to be applied to the science of global warming.
Perhaps, but scientific investigation is not their specialty, so the appeal to authority is not valid. Agent Cooper: They do not dispute the climate models. Rather, they say that theoretical models are no substitute for empirical data. The science will be settled when the empirical data say it is settled, not when a theoretical model says it is. The scientific method is a model, observational data, and the fit of the model to the data, in other words, hypothesis-testing. If you read any journal of climatology, that is exactly what climatologists do. They spend huge efforts, in often difficult conditions, to collect data in order to test their hypotheses.
#2.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2012-04-12 10:10
(Reply)
Scientists are not a valid appeal to authority on engineering questions. The sort of modeling on which climate alarmism relies is much closer to engineering than science.
If you desire to increase your knowledge simply keep visiting this web page and be updated with the newest gossip
posted here. Carlota, you minx! Are you a human being or spam-in-camo?
Nonsense. These are people who have a lifetime of successfully recognizing b.s. Since the beginning, there has been a strong "Larry Lightbulb" contingent within NASA, and the signatories are the people who kept the LL'ers honest. The claim that engineers can't evaluate the validity of science is ridiculous: it is the Engineer's job, to recognize good science from bad, and turn the good stuff into physically realizable entities.
Scientists pursue all the wild and crazy hypotheses. Engineers figure out which ones are actually true and useful. Engineers and Scientists are co-dependents. So far it's all been Scientists claiming CAGW this, climate change that. The Engineering side has just come back with it's evaluation: uh no, try again. John A. Fleming: Scientists pursue all the wild and crazy hypotheses. Engineers figure out which ones are actually true and useful.
Um, no. Scientific findings may or may not have practical engineering applications. John A. Fleming: Engineers and Scientists are co-dependents. That part is absolutely true. Engineers rely on scientists for the fundamentals of their craft. Scientists rely on engineers to devise the instrumentation so necessary to their research. John A. Fleming: The Engineering side has just come back with it's evaluation: uh no, try again. They didn't come back with an evaluation. They came back with an "Is not". If they have substance, then they should publish in the relevant journals. It doesn't take a PhD in a scientific field to be a scientist. A scientist is someone who does the actual practice of science. Hansen's only responsible for half the damage to Nasa's image. The other half was caused by the last thirty years of America's manned space program.
There is one thing the Martin shooting has made absolutely clear to me. If according to the media Zimmerman is a white Hispanic, by virtue of the same logic Barack Obama is undeniably a white Kenyan. I'm okay with that. How 'bout you?
"Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded- here and there, now and then- are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty. This is known as bad luck." - Robert A.Heinlein
|