Maggie's Farm

The linked article about Catholic bishops left me cold at best.
There is no pending legislation to force the Catholic Church to provide same-gender weddings, nor should there ever be. There is no pending legislation to compel Catholic chaplains to tell gay servicemembers that homosexual conduct is not a sin, nor should there ever be.
There is no threat to the Catholic Church if people who are Muslim or gay or Protestant join the armed forces.
And there is no inherent right for the Catholic Church to operate as a state partner in adoption services. As long as the interests of the Catholic Church, including its doctrine and mission, coincide with those of a state, a partnership may be appropriate. And it would be appropriate if the Catholic agency only sponsored Catholic married couples as adoptive parents, perhaps. But a state has no duty to the Catholic Church to use it as a partner in providing state services. If the Catholic (Methodist, Presbyterian) Church (mosque, synagogue, temple) cannot come to terms on the service rules, the state has no obligation to alter its policies to conform to (Muslim, Buddhist) Catholic doctrine.
There may be some real issues about providing elective abortion services at Catholic clinics, or emergency contraception. I don't believe any level of government has a right to compel any religiously-oriented organization to provide services which violate the organization's doctrines. But neither has any level of government a duty to subsidize an organization that refuses to operate according to the government agency's goals and policies.