Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Tuesday, November 8. 2011The Transforming Fire in the Middle EastThis afternoon I had lunch and a stroll along the ocean with a new friend, Jonathan Spyer. We struck it off immediately when he said the only organization he ever joined which he promised to obey was the Israel Defense Force. This mirrored my experience in joining the US Marine Corps. Our normally rebellious spirits matched. Spyer was in San Diego to speak about his new book, The Transforming Fire: The Rise Of The Israel-Islamist Conflict. I’d read some reviews before, all laudatory, from the left-leaning Haaretz to the right-leaning Weekly Standard. After reading the book and talking with Spyer, although the focus is on what Israel faces and the book doesn’t delve deeply into US or European foreign policy, the book could have just as easily been sub-titled The Rise of the Western-Islamist Conflict But What Israel Realizes And The West Doesn’t. Spyer’s motivation for writing the book was being blown out of the tank he was driving in the 2006 war in Lebanon, a draw that was poorly prepared for, poorly conceived, poorly executed but required the utmost – which was given – of soldiers on the ground. Spyer wanted to explore in depth what Israel is facing. Again we clicked, I having similar motivation after my tours in Vietnam. Spyer brings to his book much more than being a frontline soldier, or his travels throughout the Middle East, or his fascinating return to Lebanon after the 2006 war. British-born Spyer has a PhD in Middle East politics from the London School of Economics, and served in the Israel Prime Minister’s Office. What makes his book interesting and not dry is his weaving of his personal experiences and observations into his learned descriptions of Middle East Politics. At lunch, Spyer acknowledged that the current state of affairs in the Middle East is more negative than when he wrote the book. The “Arab Spring” unleashed violent animus toward Israel that is encouraged and supported by Iran, toppling formerly controlling, hostile but more benign toward Israel rulers in Egypt and Tunisia. Iran seeks to align a bloc with Hamas in control of Gaza, Hezbollah in control of Lebanon, and Syria as a client state of Iran as a funnel of training, arms and missiles to Hamas and Hezbollah. Saudi Arabia is comparatively weaker, as are Sunnis right now, but struggling to counter Iran’s Shia influence. For now, Iraq is slipping into Iran’s orbit, largely due to Iran’s cat’s paw there, Muqtada al-Sadr’s influence on the dominant Shia coalition in Baghdad. Meanwhile, the US is withdrawing from its former predominance in the Middle East, and Europe continues pursuing its mostly economic interests there. That leaves Israel with the question of how to survive. Among militant Islamists is the illusion that Israel is ultimately doomed due to its smaller population and adherence to values and institutions less militant than theirs. On the contrary, Spyer points out, Israel is relatively militarily and financially stronger than ever. More important, Israel’s population has largely moved past its former Ashkenazic and Sephardic divisions, or its left-right divisions, and through common experience with failed hopes and ruthless adversaries molded a more united and nationalistic leadership and purpose. Remnants of the old left are still common in academia and media but depend on the attention they are granted by Western media although their internal influence is otherwise negligible. Longer term, Spyer is optimistic. As Spyer ends his book, and still believes:
In the meantime, Israel must strike hard when necessary. Otherwise, patience is needed in the Middle East cold war with Islamists. Israel may pay harsh prices along the way, but an Iran-led Islamist encirclement will erode first. I’m reminded of our protracted conflict with the Soviet Union and all’s surprise when its walls fell. What will follow, I asked Spyer. Most likely some sort of military-commercial elite regimes, like before, still hostile toward Israel and the West, still mired in backwardness, but a lesser threat to Israel. The transforming fire is a crucible in which weaknesses are revealed and the product strengthened. The ultimately stronger is Israel’s abilities and resolve based on Western values that too many in the West have abandoned.
Posted by Bruce Kesler
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
23:24
| Comments (4)
| Trackback (1)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
A reminder:
Israel has thermonuclear bombs (H-bombs), aka city-busters. Any civilization that desires to persist in space-time would be well advised not to threaten Israel's existence. #OCCUPYFAIL: VIDEO: Is Occupy Wall Street Anti-Semitic?
Posted at 10:10 pm by Glenn Reynolds http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fmTMIjkMoLk (must-see video --perfect for the just-waking-up of one's circle) Heh - over the years I have talked with our peers about why they joined the Corps during Vietnam. Most come with with a similar version of being rebellious. In my case and with my family's background in the Coast Guard and Navy, when I decided to join up instead of college, the CG and Navy were the only choices in their minds. Well I did join the Navy - in a way. :>)
Sounds like a great book and I'll put it on my Amazon list. Normally I don't read books like this because they tend to get very wordy and convoluted but it sounds like Spyer has a handle on that. Looking forward to it. 1) You write:
"Remnants of the old left are still common in academia and media but depend on the attention they are granted by Western media although their internal influence is otherwise negligible." - - - - - - - - - - - - As they say in Yiddish "Halevai" ("if only..."). During the heated debate about the Shalit ransom deal, it emerged that an entire generation of IDF officers have been emasculated by left-wing indoctrination. This is largely through programs that send these officers to study "international relations" from left-wing professors and other "experts". These officers' concept of what actions are even possible have been narrowed by the PC multi-culti perspective fed to them by the euro-funded leftie elites: "Israel cannot conquer or vanquish its enemies" "no military solution is possible for terror" "Israel must hem itself in to curry favor" "we cannot dictate terms even when victorious" ... in short, the whole post-colonial litany deployed to hamstring the West's defense of itself. It will take at least a decade to undo this indoctrination, and to place "settlers" and other highly motivated, patriotic officers in key positions. 2) The future: "still hostile toward Israel and the West, still mired in backwardness, but a lesser threat to Israel." - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Yes - if only because the Arab "Spring" has unleashed internecine sectarian tensions that were kept down by the dictators. The Arabs will be (hopefully) too busy tearing at each other to worry about Israel. They will also be too poor - the end of most Western largesse, combined with that "backwardness", will plunge the region into even greater poverty. The classic example of this is Egypt - one of the most populous Arab countries, but with no visible means of support once the Brotherhood fundies chase Western aid and tourists away. |
Tracked: Nov 09, 04:58
Tracked: Nov 09, 04:58
Tracked: Nov 09, 04:58
Tracked: Nov 09, 04:58
Tracked: Nov 09, 04:58
Tracked: Nov 09, 04:58
Tracked: Nov 09, 11:47