Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Thursday, June 2. 2011Thursday morning linksWorms from Hell Cool teaching tool: VIDEO: Use Tripline for history and social studies projects Sealed tunnel discovered under Teotihuacan temple The Tappan Zee Is Falling Down Mead: SCOTUS Makes It Official: California A Failed State Sesame Street Spreads Secret Political Messages, Insiders Admit (h/t Doug Ross) Limousine liberals? Number of government-owned limos has soared under Obama Not supposed to entertain such thoughts: Mainstream columnist says blacks and Hispanics are failing in school because they don't have the ability to do academic work True also of lots of white kids from dysfunctional families, it seems to me Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Vicki Hearne speculated that blacks are not able to believe things quickly enough to succeed in a modern communications-oriented career.
That was back when speculating about school and family discipline was still not allowed, but it was a nice put-down of the media. The educational ability issue has nothing to do with being black or Hispanic, and everything to do with culture.
My son is Hispanic (as is my wife, but not me), born in Mexico in a middle-class setting. He's been here in white-bread central PA for 8 years now, and has always been at the top of his class academically. Anecdotal, I know. But I truly believe that his abilities are based not upon his "race," but rather upon his stable and middle-class upbringing both in Mexico and here. I think that would be proven out across the board, if it were possible. It's sad that it's not. BD -
On a related subject, see if this link works; http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/books/chi-books-make-mark-video,0,2442537.htmlstory Here in Chicago, the Tribune is sponsor to an annual book fest on Printers Row. This year, it has been repackaged as "Litfest", the theme being literacy. The lead advertising point which appears on the website, in the linked video and the "Constant Contact" bombardment emails we are getting - is that 53% of adults in Chicago cannot read. How that can be when the Chicago school system is one of the more costly in the country, well, I can't imagine. NO, maybe I can - this being Chicago and all.... Why anyone would want to advertise the fact that the system is failing in it's most basic task is such a weird concept, and to use it as an advertising "slogan" - I am, quite frankly, aghast! It creates so many questions in my mind, I can't keep up! On the other hand, maybe now I can understand why our teachers here are so concerned about their pensions (which are adding so much to our state and city budget woes)..... they can't wait to get out of their schools and associate with people who CAN read! 53% of adults - in a major American city. What a sad, sad fact. What has happened to our schools? I suspect it isn't that they aren't capable, it's that the necessary skills have not been taught by their parent who likely never was taught them, either, as well as all those well-meaning people who won't allow anyone else to teach them. Mess with their self-esteem? Not gonna happen.
Never learned to read at home, meself.
Ma was a Nazi in hiding and refused to share Duetche. Dysfunctional she refused to share English, too. Pa had University Degree but i doubt he could read well enough to pass it on. So , i had to wait till public school to learn much 'tall. In New Mexico most folks don't read. I also taught to read by my parents as a small child. God bless them for that effort. I resisted. I was rewarded by their persistence.
Well, back in my day, before I was even born, I had to leave the womb and walk five miles in the snow to the library to learn how to read.
Your lede and the post by L. Auster at View from the Right both misquote Michael Goodwin. It's not that Hispanics and African-Americans lack the intellectual ability. Rather, too many such kids come from broken or single-parent families in which education is not nearly as highly emphasized as in white families whose middle class values prize a good education. As Goodwin says, "these kids are unprepared to succeed in the world because they never had to confront their failure."
IMHO, too many liberal Americans, like the nanny city mayor Michael Bloomberg, tend (out of white guilt, perhaps) to patronize minority students and lower their expectations for them. It doesn't take long for the kids to pick up on these diminished expectations, being the street-wise smart consumers they are. Unless they manage to overcome the natural skepticism of all kids to anything adults ever say, to buy into the argument that education is the key to a good job and success in life, and to overcome the ever present peer pressure against "acting white," the opportunity is there for them to just slough off. They quickly discover they can coast through school without the adults in authority ever calling them to account---heck, the white ones live in constant fear of getting accused of racism and getting involved in a nasty public squabble with race hustlers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. The minority kids know that and they are not beyond using that as leverage to their advantage. Big Al, Sam L, Agent Cooper - If only it were true.
The reality is heartbreaking because we don't know what they hell we should do about it. So we go on believing the myth, that it is culture, or expectations, or family dysfunction that drive minority failure. Those are all partial explanations, and we should do everything we can to change or counteract them. But the harsh reality resides in the numbers. Without any knowledge of skin color, place of birth, or cultural background, you can look at the junk DNA of a person and tell which continent their ancestors were from (American blacks and the native/black/european mix in Latin America are the major exceptions to this, but even there, you can tell the proportions pretty well). Then if you group them by hundreds, you can predict in advance what the average IQ is going to be and be darn close. All those other variables have been controlled for in many studies, and do not provide the robust explanatory power that genetics do. Social pathologies are strongly influenced by family dysfunction, but academic problems only indirectly. You have no idea how much I wish this were not true. One hope on the horizon is that adaptability is increasing in its survival importance relative to g-factor intelligence, and may become more important rather quickly. Minorities may match or even exceed whites and asians on that scale. AVI, I thought of addressing that in my former post. It's the old "MY Fair Lady/Trading Places" enigma.
I'm not sure it's all solved even now. I guess I just believe, not in the inherent "goodness" of all men, but in the ability of all, given the grace of God. I'll continue to operate on that premise, even if it is to my demise. And it has nearly been, a number of times. Alan It doesn't require a genius IQ to graduate from high school while knowing how to read and to balance a checkbook, and IQ is not the sole determinant of whether a person makes a success or a mess of his life. A modest IQ, hard work, perseverance, a dedication to staying out of trouble, good health, a bit of skill or talent in the right calling, good connections who can offer a favor or two at the right time, all of these factors can ensure success in life---maybe not untold wealth, but a good job, a nice family, and a comfortable home make a person richer today than the vast majority of people who have ever lived on Earth. The differences in average IQ of ethnic/racial genetic origin are far outweighed by the vastly larger dispersion in IQs of any two individuals who are selected at random.
I don't entirely disagree. Without the additional social and cultural pathologies, a fair number of NAM's would be graduating and succeeding. But we are talking about a 1SD difference in average cases. (.5SD for hispanics) I had something close to one of those. My fourth son, adopted from Romania when he was 13 after as bad an early childhood as you can imagine, probably has an IQ around 90. If he had been a determined, hard worker at academics - if he had been well above average in that category, he would have gotten through reasonably well. But he was only average in that - he arrived a little below average in comparison to other boys his age and left our home for adulthood a little above. That combination meant that we really had to drag him across the finish line for graduation, and he then completed about half of a good auto tech school. The Marines brought some more good things out of him. But when a student is starting in that hole, he can't afford to be much below average in anything else - not in effort, not in social skills, not in resilience.
We love the stories of kids who are in fact above average in all those other things and succeed over obstacles. But effort, and charm, and resilience also seem to have some heritable aspects. If we have them it may not just be because of our wonderful noble characters that we earned every scrap of. Those qualities may have a genetic loading as well, and the idea that "anyone can do it" maybe only partly true. Should more NAM's with IQ 100 be graduating and doing well? Sure. But It is much harder to get a kid with IQ 85 through HS than most people think. As usual,the mainstream media have it all screwed up. Those of us who were very early reeaders, are virtually self taught, especially if our parents read to us every night, from good books with great vocabularies. If a writer is good enough, like Kenneth Grahame [Wind in the Willows], or Rudyard Kipling [Just So Stories]or Francis Hodgson Burnett [A Little Princess and The Secret Garden] the "new words" that he or she includes have such a plain meaning that the child learns vocabulary every time he reads or is read to. I was fortunate in that my Dad was a missionary teacher in China before the First World War and he chose books for my brother and me that were so riveting that we memorized much of them without thinking about it. A fact which explains our large vocabularies. My husband had much the same experience with his parents.
Looking back, I would say that the gift of regular nightly reading out loud was one of the most precious gifts my parents left me. The knowledge gained then, equipped me to make a good living writing words for money all my working life. Marianne |