Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Sunday, May 22. 2011Reactions to President Obama at AIPACFirst, what is AIPAC? The American Israel Political Action Committee Second, what is the root of the divide between Prime Minister Netanyahu and President Obama? It goes back to core principles and experiences. Third, geographic perspective: Rocket ranges from Gaza; Even less from West Bank Now, some reactions to the President's speech at AIPAC:
Palestinians find another ally for no peace:
Me: Obama to Israel, "Let's agree to disagree, and you'll pay for it later, out of sight of this audience." Netanyahu replies: "My audience will hear from me tomorrow, and the next day, and the next, and the next, despite your sellouts."
Posted by Bruce Kesler
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
13:21
| Comments (16)
| Trackback (1)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
What I don't understand is why so many Jewish people in this country voted for the empty suit knowing who he listened to for twenty years? And Wright was just one of many friends who talked that way. Israel is a civilized nation and its people have contributed much to this world, yet the Jewish people here voted for someone who is trying to destroy Israel. Let's face it, O hates the Jews and is demonstrating his hatred at this time. Are they going to wise up or vote for him again?
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
So tell me, friends, strategically speaking, is it better for Netanyahu and Israel that Obama bloviated first, so that Netanyahu has time to prepare a truly cutting rebuttal in his speech to AIPAC tomorrow? With the distance that old age has given me, I suspect the advantage will go to Bibi.
And like most of the Israeli soldiers I've seen over the years, Bibi looked both handsome and dangerous as a young man. Barack, uhh, not so much. Marianne I never thought about it but, yes, I would think that Bibi has the advantage. I almost forgot what a real leader looks like. What a difference between him and O.
Obama has provided cover for the Palestinians to increase their demands. He has been, in one sense, more intransigent than they are.
Those two photos tell the whole life story -- one serious, the other frivolous. What else is ther to know? Blick
Israel no longer has U.S. support. The message has been sent to all of the Mid East.Obama is making that very clear,
as he leaves D.C. to seek his Irish roots. Dennis ... I think it's more accurate to say that for the time being, as long as That Person is in control of the White House, Israel can't count on the Administration's support. Things may be different [Please God] after the 2012 election. He still has 18 months or so to add still more luster to his Mrs. Malaprop reputation as a Speaker, and some of his former supporters are getting tired of his incessant facetime. We'll see, won't we?
Marianne Found this website awhile back when I wanted to see just how big Israel is. It is just a bit less north/south than Alabama. Or from Portland, OR to the Canadian Border (or as wide as Washington state)
Or for those in the NE, from Long Island Sound to the Vermont/Canadian Border http://mapfrappe.com/?show=2937 Width is a trickier problem, but it isn't as wide as Puget Sound or half the width of the New England block of states between NY and Maine. True, and a bit misleading, as most of the population and economy is in the north, less height than Vermont, and at width also less, winnowing down to 9-miles and all subject to rockets from Gaza, West bank and Lebanon.
Comparing square miles, Israel was about the same size as New Jersey when it held the Sinai peninsula - but it is narrower.
The whole country is basically one coastal plain overlooked by one mountain range. This is why Netanyahu keeps mentioning the Jordan River valley. Easiest way to get this is to watch this 5-minute video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytWmPqY8TE0 From the video, that was an angry Obama giving a speech at AIPAC."How dare you not think my Middle East Speech was absolutely wonderful?" Or is is just "How dare you disagree with me?"
The absolutely amazing thing to me when I see a map of tiny Israel surrounded by huge Arab neighbors who want its destruction, is that anyone would think that Israel has to give up land to the "Palestinians" to have some kind of peace. How about some of those huge Arab neighbors giving up a little of their land so that their brother Arab Muslims can have a larger homeland? Aren't the so-called Palestinians ethnically Jordanians? There's no such thing as 'ethnic Jordanians'. They're all ethnic Arabs. The Arabs are arguable the most successful colonizers as they don't just politically and culturally take over a territory, they also conquer a territory ethnically. Just look at Egypt. About the only true Egyptians left ethnically and culturally are the Orthodox Copts. The Arab Egyptians can't stand for that and are trying to ethnically purify Egypt as another Arab country.
This is just another ridiculous hypocrisy of the left who are supposedly against colonialism and ethnic cleansing. It seems as if Obama is trying to equal that other great idiot / supporter of the "Palestinian cause," Jimmah Carter. He is succeeding in so many ways...
What's interesting to me, phil g, is that there was no such thing as a "ethnic Palestinian" under the Ottamans; Palestine was merely another one of their provinces. It took the creation, and survival against all odds, of Israel, to prompt the "creation" of the Palestinian people. I too am for going back to the original borders of Pre-Jun67 - and let the negotiations begin again with stronger purpose.
BO's lame Nevile Chamberlain impression will be far worse than his piece of paper and lame promise. All it will amount to is fertilizer for renewed growth of violence, misery, and bloodshed. And, a renewed vigor to destroy the Jews/Zionists/ect. Appeasement only prolongs the agony and diminishes the will to resist. If his attempt at stewarding the country, navigating the ship of State is ANYTHING like his foreign policy, we, along with Israel, are screwed. The distance from Gaza to Jerusalem is 70 km, which Obama apparently thinks is no big whoop. The distance from Cuba to Miami is 365 km, five times farther away. Yet JFK was willing to go to war with Russia to prevent missiles from being placed there. Obama was only 14 months old at the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis but that's no excuse. The historically illiterate Obama needs to get familiar with his own country's past so he might begin to appreciate the history of other nations. The world did not begin in August 1961.
|
Tracked: May 22, 14:25
Tracked: May 22, 17:25
Tracked: May 23, 06:56
Tracked: May 23, 06:56
Tracked: May 23, 06:56
Tracked: May 23, 06:56
Tracked: May 23, 06:56
Tracked: May 23, 06:56
Tracked: May 23, 06:56