Maggie's Farm

We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.

Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page

Much Sorry with Delays
Birth, Death and All That Stuff in Between
How to Honor Labor Day, Every Day
My Yom Kippur Miracle (Repost from 2010)
Good intro to fly casting
Peach update, with pie
NYC update
Easy for you to say: To the elites on mass immigration
For NYC on 9/11, Sailors' Snug Harbor
Pickled Peaches
Water Shoes
Labor Costs in U.S.
Your "identity"
Good news about The Great Courses
Uses of Hot Pepper Jelly/Sauce, Chutneys, and Jams
A Saturday Drive to Litchfield County, CT
How to Pick a Kayak
Civilized: Fruit forks and knives
Loads of kayaking on Cape Cod
Psychology Experiments' Questionable Results

Categories


All categories

Quicksearch

Links

Blog Administration

Open login screen

RSS Readers

Add to Google

Subscribe with Bloglines

Monday, April 4. 2011

Scientists say...

Scientists from Penn, Harvard, and the U of South Australia say this:



Based on our analyses, we concluded that the global warming alarm is an anti-scientific political movement.

Posted by The News Junkie at 10:27 | Comments (5) | Trackbacks (0)

Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry

No Trackbacks

Comments
Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

Well duh.... :>)
#1 Tom Francis on 2011-04-04 10:42 (Reply)
It itself looks like scientism.

You can't solve the Navier Stokes equations, is the killer of all forecasts.

Everything is pulled from your ass, as a result.

No 100 principles of scientific behavior needed.
#2 rhhardin (Link) on 2011-04-04 11:36 (Reply)
Yah think?
#3 JoeC on 2011-04-04 11:52 (Reply)
Wow, just....wow....

Anybody with an ounce of logic could see the fallacy and utter junk in the science.

When you add the outright resentment for rebuttal and critique, you knew the jig was up.

The hacking of the emails and data files were the buttercream on top of the cake.

If it was a just and lawful civilization, the perpetrators would be tarred and feathered, as a herald warning for all future attempts at such chicanery...
#4 Fred Zeppelin on 2011-04-05 07:24 (Reply)
It pains my heart to think of the REAL environmental conservation through habitat preservation / restoration that COULD have been done with all the BILLIONS of $ poured down the AGW piss hole.
#5 LWS on 2011-04-05 09:10 (Reply)

Add Comment
(Your e-mail will not show in your comment)

By commenting on this site you agree to the site rules listed here. Email
addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for email notifications.

Quick reference guide: [i] italics [/i], [b] bold [/b], [u] underline [/u],
[url] (web address) [/url]. More tips here.

Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications.

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA

BBCode format allowed
 
 
A Chris Southern Consulting website.