Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Friday, September 24. 2010Equal Justice For All?Are all Americans entitled to equal protections under the law? Of course, except if relying upon the current leadership of US Department of Justice. Reluctantly, only after misrepresentations were made to Congress by officials of the US Department of Justice, the chief of the DOJ’s Voting Rights Section – with over three decades service in the DOJ -- claimed whistleblower protections to spill the beans to In his testimony, Christopher Coates, recounting his direct experiences, summed up “the hostility in the Civil Right Division (CRD) and Voting Section toward the equal enforcement of some of the federal voting laws.”:
Another Voting Rights Section attorney who resigned to blow the same whistle comments, “My profession has not seen a hero like Coates since the giants of the civil rights movement convinced the courts to eradicate legal racial discrimination. Coates has dedicated a lifetime to following in their footsteps, to ensuring free access to the ballot.” I just checked Google news. No MSM coverage yet. I just checked another major aggregator of news wires. No coverage yet. Surely there will be, some. That is not enough. It is up to the voters in November to see that there’s a Congress which conducts proper oversight of the Obama Justice Department, to ensure equal justice for all.
Posted by Bruce Kesler
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
10:48
| Comments (12)
| Trackbacks (0)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Bruce, I just checked The Washington Post webpage and (as many have predicted) they have a story up about Stephen Colbert's testimony but NOTHING whatsoever about Mr Coates' testimony. At this time (0922MDT) Mr Coates' statement has been read and he is undergoing questioning. Guess The Post doesn't think this story to be important enough. OTOH, PJTV had the testimony live. Excuse my vulgarity, but the MSM sucks.
chuck Surprise! Surprise! It's government policy that only Whitey can be racist and needs persecuting - I mean prosecutiong. I'm watching on C-SPAN. Mr. Coates is a Daniel-in-the-lion's-den. Some of the Democrat questioners are trying to play gotcha'. Commissioner Michael Yaki (D) played the RaceCard (tm) about a group of white MinuteMen in Pima, Arizona, legally standing beyond the defined limit from the polling place, and, omG, one of the men was wearing a holstered pistol - legal in Arizona. Mr. Yaki expanded the legally carried pistol into "men with guns" and tried to equate their legal gathering with the threats, racial slurs, and unlawful acts of the New Black Panthers. This is not going well for Eric Holder or his racist minions at the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ. More light, please. And popcorn.
... and now Yaki is trying to make it seem that the NPBB case was brought to light too quickly ("within 40 or so days") as compared with Brown or the Pima County cases. His democrat credentials and biases are obvious. PJTV has now stopped broadcasting but I think what was said after Mr Coates read his statement was as damning as the statement itself.
Now that we KNOW how Holder is running the DOJ, it would be interesting to re-examine his already shady past.
As icing on the cake, it turns out that Malik Shabazz (the black panther racist) was a guest at the White House residence (http://biggovernment.com/abreitbart/2010/09/24/which-malik-shabazz-visited-white-house-in-july-2009-mr-president/). Of course the White House is saying it was another Malik Shabazz. Seems reasonable to me. After all there are so many Malik Shabazzes!
That name (Malik Shabazze) reminds me of Idaho. I've never met any by that name nor been to Idaho, so neither exists in my world...
Well dorf, I guess that settles it. The White House must be lying because Malik Shebazz could not have visited the residence because there is no such person! :-)
Well, The Post finally has something up about this. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/24/AR2010092403873.html Interesting to read some of the comments written by the liberal DC apologists. There truly is a disconnect in the mindset between "inside the beltway" and outside the beltway. Glad I now live in a flyover state.
chuck I've not expected equal protection (or in fact any protection) from the law (and those sworn to uphold it) for years, probably over a decade.
The closest big-city paper to us is the Houston Chronicle. For some weeks now, they've just about quit carrying any political news at all, presumably in preparation for the midterm elections. All that's left is celebrity gossip and local murders. Today they did manage to feature an AP piece about how the problem Americans really have with ObamaCare is that it wasn't extreme enough. Out of curiosity, I checked for "Coates" on the Chron website and came up blank. Lots of stuff on Colbert, of course.
Texan99 ... IMHO, The Houston Chronicle is not a real newspaper, [even though it's the only daily newspaper in the 4th largest city in America]. It's a combination of fan magazine and a supermarket Greensheet. Even the
Regional News section is not complete, nor objective. We subscribe to it because my husband is foolishly sentimental that he worked for it for two years after he graduated from college. The paper was better then, back in the 1940s. It's gone steadily downhill since. We get our real news from The Wall Street Journal, although it also has a more liberal slant in its news section. The Opinion section is much more objective section, and I depend on that, and the Internet, and Fox News to see something of what is really going on. Marianne |
Tracked: Sep 25, 01:08
Tracked: Sep 25, 06:53
Tracked: Sep 25, 06:53
Tracked: Sep 25, 06:53
Tracked: Sep 25, 06:53