Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, September 18. 2010Saturday morning links10 Job Search Mistakes You're Probably Making LA: $111 million for 55 jobs. It should be a scandal. The limits of science. A quote:
City Journal on charter school lotteries AVI thinks about poverty. Before I even get to his considerations, I need to know who is in those stats, and how poverty is currently defined (for example, does it include the value of government benefits? I know it excludes assets, and only looks at income.). Does it include grad students with stipends and free housing? People with two cars? Women's Studies grads living at home who can't find a job? 19 year-old single moms with four kids? People who are temporarily out of work? People who work off the books? - (Who hasn't heard "I'll do it for $500, or $200 in cash"?). Maine potato or blueberry farmers with 200 acres? Chronic schizophrenics and the mentally disabled who can only work in sheltered situations? The creepy Goth gals with the tats and body-piercings who work part-time in the truck stops in St. Johnsbury and Lebanon NH and live with their boyfriends? Unemployed actors and dancers? Waiters in Colorado Springs who do not declare their tips? Drug dealers who declare no income? The elderly living on Social Security? I mean, I know there is some poverty (and tons of programs to assist them), but who are they? And how much of it is elective in some sense, like my hippie Maine Guide who wants to follow his heart and doesn't give a damn about income? Or people who won't leave Michigan when there are jobs for them in Texas and Alabama? Money is not everybody's primary motivator, but I know there are tons of ambitious Americans looking hard for work right now in this crappy Obama economy. I just want to know who is in those stats. Powerline on the politics of the stupid and obnoxious lightbulb ban Castle seems to have felt entitled. Here's another sore loser. Grow up, people. Take your lumps, and go get a $1 million/yr lobbying job in DC if you don't like living in your home state. Or is it about a twisted desire for power? What does Take Back America mean to you? For years, a common yard and barn sign in nothern Vermont has been "Take Back Vermont." (I don't think they took it back yet, and soon the posters of those signs will be dead. Dead and buried, ayup.) Nice Magazine You’ve Got There, Mr. Forbes… Be a shame if something were to happen to it… Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Re: The Limits of Science
Our knowledge of Physics [and in fact our knowledge in general] is like an expanding balloon, with the surface of the balloon as the current state of our knowledge, and outside of the balloon is ignorance; everything we don't know. The more the balloon expands, the greater the area of our ignorance becomes. Today physicists ask questions that Neils Bohr could not have dreamed of. We will never learn all there is to know. Not even a tiny fraction. But knowledge we acquire makes life better, so it is worth pursuing for its own sake. In "$111 million for 55 jobs" the best quote is the last one stating that none of the money was mis-spent. Which is worse: that the government honestly spends $2 million per job or that the city auditor can't recognize corruption?
If the money had been given to a charitable organization, and that organization had taken a $1 million fee (about 1%), then 2220 people could have been given $50,000/year jobs. "Take Back Vermont" is about a culture war which has been going on in Vermont for 45 years. Old timers, traditionalists, vs the Lefty Flatlanders. Call them early Tea Party-types. 'Tis true, though, that we traditionalists have not taken back Vermont- yet.
But the tide is finally beginning to turn as there will soon be no choice but to throw the bums in the legislature out. They have overstayed their welcome and it is timefor them to go. The Dem-Prog Legislature is hopelessly captive of the teachers and public employees unions. I've been re- reading a fascinating book about the VT Republican Party called "The Star That Set: The VT Republican Party, 1854-1974", by Samuel B Hand. Describes the 120 year dominance of Vermont by the GOP. Time for the sequel to describe the following 45 years of Dem-Prog dominance of the agenda and the state's sdecline as a result. 45 years is more than enough for the other side; their naive Utopian visiion has prevented the state from producing the economic growth without which the average Vermonter's chances for a decent living have greatly diminished. Major regulatory, tax, and education reform are necessary....it is time for the VT GOP to rise again and it can do so by taking a cue from NJ Gov Christie, the state the lefties use to stop any kind of reform:"You don't want Vermont to look like NJ, do you?" The irony is amusing. Vermont can remain a country state without being Socialist.
But as we learned from Europe, Socialism and Communism are very good at preventing any change. Thus the historic charms of these museum nations. Progessive=Regressive. Re light bulbs: Just say no to CFL bulbs. Among their other drawbacks, they make lots of radio interference. Just hold a portable radio near one of them and hear for yourself. Come to that, take your radio over to a working light dimmer . . .
Re Vermont: Amen to the Rise Again phenomenon. Been away so long . . . Speaking as a Newhampshireman who has watched traditional Vermonters get eased out over the course of my lifetime, let me assure you that when we complain about VT, it's not you we're talking about. You got New York, we got MA, starting about ten years later. Do you think we can work out a reconfiguration that puts historic Vermonters and Newhampshiremen in the same state, leaving those others with the other half? I don't much care what real estate we get, frankly. The company will be good enough.
The Congressional ban on the sale of incandescent light bulbs after January 1, 2011, is typical of the corruption rampant in the halls of our present Congress. For 100 years, the incandescent light bulb was a benign presence in our houses and public buildings. A great variety of such bulbs for every application, both at home and in the public arena, was developed and used. If one of these bulbs burned out, as they eventually did, we simply removed it, put it in the trash and substituted a fresh one.
Then Nancy Pelosi, the leader of the House corrupt Busybody Brigade, got hungrier and hungrier for more campaign funds. And GE, the chief maker of these compact fluorescent bulbs, [we call them the 'short and curlies' at Our House] got greedier and greedier for more money. The S and Cs were simply not selling. People found that they gave an ugly glary light and they faded precious artwork. And that they were the devil and all to dispose of because they were loaded with mercury, and required a whole team of Hazmat experts to safely get rid of them. Last year Congressman Ted Poe gave quite a talk about the bulb disposal problems, and infuriated the Squeaker of the House [and amused his fellow legislators]. Anyway, the GE lobbyists talked to Miss Nancy, promising large donations to her perpetual campaign fund. She happily agreed and the dirty deed was done. So what is left for us hardworking taxpayers? A faint hope that new Congress, which will be extremely busy for many years trying to rectify the dreadful mistakes this Congress has committed against the welfare of the hardworking taxpayers, will repeal this incredibly stupid mandate of this Congress, and restore the 100-year-old blessing of Edison's wonderful incandescent bulb. But don't hold your breath. Marianne Marianne Note that Hutterites in some western states are eligible for food stamps and other government assistance because they own nothing as individuals. Are they counted in the poverty statistics and what about other similar groups?
|
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:16
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:18
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:21
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:25
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:29
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:53
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:55
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:57
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 20:59
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:00
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:02
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:09
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:11
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:13
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:19
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:34
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:39
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:41
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 18, 21:52
BD's tab dump this morning addressed poverty in America. Who are the poor? What is in their lives, he wondered. Tiger provides this: ...by simple, homey measures of comfort and convenience, the lowest rung on the income ladder lives better lives today
Tracked: Sep 28, 07:35