Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Friday, August 27. 2010I Just Disinherited My Alma MaterI just updated my will and trust and, with heavy heart, cut out what was a significant bequest to my alma mater, Brooklyn College. What caused the disinheritance is that all incoming freshmen and transfer students are given a copy of a book to read, and no other, to create their “common experience.” This same book is one of the readings in their required English course. The author is a radical pro-Palestinian professor there. When I attended in the 1960s, Brooklyn College – then rated one of the tops in the country -- was, like most campuses, quite liberal. But, there was no official policy to inculcate students with a political viewpoint. Now there is. That is unacceptable. The book is How Does It Feel To Be A Problem?: Being Young and Arab in America It is interviews with seven Arab-Americans in their 20s about their experiences and difficulties in the US. There’s appreciation of freedoms in the US, and deep resentment at feeling or being discriminated against post-9/11. The seven are not a representative sample. Six are Moslem and one Christian. According to the Arab American Institute, 63% of Arab-Americans are Christian, 24% Muslim. The author chose those interviewed and those included in the book. The title of the book is drawn from communist WEB DuBois’ same question in 1903 in his treatise The Souls of Black Folk. The current book consciously draws a parallel, ridiculous on its face, between the horrible and pervasive discrimination and injustices that Blacks were subjected to a century ago and Arab-Americans today. The author asserts “The core issue [of Middle East turbulence] remains the rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination,” that the post-1967 history of the entire area is essentially that of “imperialism American-style,” and that the US government “limits the speech of Arab Americans in order to cement United States policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.” Again, preposterous. The author is Moustafa Bayoumi. He is called an “Exalted Islamic Grievance Peddler” with the following summary of his background:
Most recently, Bayoumi edited a book, Midnight on the Mavi Marmara: The Attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla and How It Changed the Course of the Israel/Palestinian Conflict, defending it and calling it Israel’s Selma, Alabama, the focal point for US civil rights struggles in the 1960s. Online I found two professors who protested to the college president. One, retired from Brooklyn College, said: "This is wholly inappropriate. It smacks of indoctrination. It will intimidate incoming students who have a different point of view (or have formed no point of view), sending the message that only one side will be approved on this College campus. It can certainly intimidate untenured faculty as well." Another, currently on the faculty, said: "While our community of learning is committed to freedom of speech and expression, does that require that we must expose new students to the anti-American and anti-Israeli preachings of this professor? At the least, do not our students deserve a balanced presentation?" Another retired professor living in Brooklyn, protested and received back from a Dean:
The professor tells us what happened next:
Another professor’s unpublished letter (which I verified with him; I've verified the others also) to the college president said: “Anyone who has taught at a university during the past quarter-century and more knows that the slogan of ‘diversity’ generally alludes to its opposite (i.e., imposed uniformity of thought camouflaged by diversity of physical appearance) and also foretells mischief.”
I will always appreciate the excellent liberal arts education I received at Brooklyn College, and the critical thinking that has caused me to disinherit it. A Board member tells me the 55,000 Scholars for Peace in the Middle East is now considering its next move. See UPDATE
Posted by Bruce Kesler
in Education, Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays
at
15:31
| Comments (88)
| Trackbacks (13)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I stopped giving money to my AM, the University of Michigan, for essentially identical reasons.
As with you, I am grateful for what Michigan provided to and for me, and still have fond memories. I agree with your motivation. I only wished that it would have been possible to rely on the Jewish faculty members of any college to have stood up in defense of straight, white non-Jewish faculty members during the past 20 years. You know the ones--the white guys under attack from the "deconstructivists", or the "fem nazis". In large part they have not been there to defend vigorously those ideals of balanced/equal presentation of information when the other guy's ox was being gored!
Wow.
Obviously, the education provided by all these "disinherited" colleges FAILED to reach your narrow little brains. I'm sure these academic establishments are just as happy to cut all ties with the likes of yourselves... Indeed sad, Bruce. I stopped giving money to my college over 10 years ago, when I realized the management had gone so far into "diversity" that a practicing Catholic PhD with any kind of conservative view had almost no chance of getting hired. PC has indeed been viral for a decade or
more now, and it's amazing that so many people know it's steaming crap, yet it just goes on and on in so many places and so many ways. It really is a sickness in Western society, part of the suicide pact some parts of the West seem to have signed up for. And it started in the schools, has more or less taken over a very large fraction of our educational system. This does not bode well for the future. MarDivPhoto Good for you.
Send them a copy of this short essay so they know. And, perhaps, replace the recipient with a more worthy one. Surely there is an educational institution out there worthy of your bequest. Good for You. I know I pay enough in state and federal taxes that support colleges. They have enough endowments already. They don't listen to their clients, the students and parents muchless the alumni and taxpayer.
The professor/author complains about western imperialism but in today's world Islam has the most imperialistic mindset of all. Simply a diversionary tactic to complain so other won't notice what his side is doing. Maybe they could peruse some of the writings of Daniel Pearl? I never gave a dime to my AM. They went to the dark side before I graduated.
Way to go, Bruce! It reminds me of (Uncle) Walter Williams saying that the schools will change when the people who donate money to them stop. To paraphrase: "They'll get the message when pocketbooks all across America are snapping shut".
You might want to consider naming Hillsdale College in your will. They provide a very nice free publication of conservative thought called Inprimus. They also take NO govt money so they can teach what they want. Excellent and touching essay, Bruce, illuminating the basic logical disconnect between what Liberal faculties say they believe, and what they actually do believe. Certainly they don't believe in free speech and expression of differing viewpoints.
I too 'disinherited' my alma mater, Columbia University, after they offered a podium to that malignant dwarf, Ahmadinijad, to spew his anti-American poison from, and at the same time denied the founder of the Minute Men, that organization of border observers who were documenting the constant invasions of illegal aliens across our southern borders. Not fighting with them, which would have been illegal, just observing and photographing them. The university administration allowed the rowdy students to cut off the speech of the Minute Men founder, but coddled Ahmadinijad and gave him a platform. In a letter to the university I told them they didn't need my modest contributions. And they weren't going to get them. Marianne Dear All: I am so grateful for and proud of you! These are small and important demonstrations, we also need members of the faculty to have the courage to stand together and protest.
I've never understood why Americans feel themselves obliged to give money (and often very large amounts of money) to their old schools for years, even decades, after they graduate there, and apparently even after death.
Haven't you paid through your teeth for your education there already? Does any one of you pay hundreds of thousands in donations to say IBM in gratitude for inventing the personal computer? Or to John Deere for coming up with the combine harvester? Damn good for you , and you all.. !!!
"You might want to consider naming Hillsdale College in your will. They provide a very nice free publication of conservative thought called Inprimus"......?"> > Give me a break,find a way to let common sense prevail....,or just keep on backing the ya'lls old 2 party system> on the outside lookin in Heh-I had thought of mentioning Hillsdale College. (I grew up in Jackon, MI). Dad said that he would pay for it -though I do not know how he could have done so)
HC used to be one of the very few colleges that did not accept Federal Dollars. Coming back overseas after coming from points West, the USAF would pretty much drop me off anywhere in the country. Michigan was good for me, a great start on my education, and you were pretty much assured of being hired by one the Big 3 back then "mid-70's". Ah Well, the road not taken and all that. Ron 11.1, what is wrong with you?
You wrote: "HC used to be one of the very few colleges that did not accept Federal Dollars." They STILL don't accept Federal Dollars!!!!!! Bill, I confess to not checking on that issue -I should have qualified my comment as it could easily have been intepreted to mean that HC now took Federal money.
I was fairly certain that Hillsdale still declined to accept the Federal purse strings. Mea Culpa, Mea Culpa In a meager attempt at atonement, please let me recommend "Imprimis", HC's most excellent, and free, monthly digest that provides a taste of the quality that is Hillsdale College. (confession -I have been reading Imprimis off and on for almost thirty years, not long after its debut) http://bit.ly/56Lz7w In looking at my noted comment, it should have been "Jackson, MI". Both of my parents were born and grew up on farms around the Hillsdale area. Thanks for the correction Bill! No worries, Ron. And, I'm sorry I sounded harsh. It was actually shock.
I am a regular reader of Imprimus, and join you in recommending it. Bill http://www.fox11online.com/dpp/news/Sterling-Hall-Bombing-40-Years-Ago-
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2576338/posts ...the sort of thing, if not THE thing, that Peace Flotilla organizer, Hyde Park gentry, Chicago lawfare industry insider, celebrity terrorist folklore heroine, and rainmaker for the political career of our current president, Bernardine Dohrn was doing, forty years ago. I gave to my AM for four years. They call it tuition. After that "take a hike"
I stopped giving money to Harvard College because of their policy on ROTC. I stopped giving money to my seminary, Yale Divinity, because they ripped the pews out of the chapel and actively promote alternative religions (WICCA, etc.) and spend most of their time debating gay rights, feminism, social justice, gender issue, oppression, give tenure to PC twits instead of real scholars, and focus on trivia, anything except the call of God to His people and His call to people to care for his flock in congregations.
--tho its topic is grim, your long sentence is a beautiful use of the language, R.
I have continued to make annual contributions to my alma mater, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. But after they made a freshman reading choice a few years ago similar to the one you describe at Brooklyn College, I stopped contributing to the general fund. Instead, I earmark my contributions to the business school (which for the most part has the good sense to avoid this sort of nonsense) and to merit-based scholarship programs. Most of my friends have done the same.
We have a new Chancellor; I am hopeful that he will try to rein in some of the more ridiculous loonies. I'm an alum of the Un. of Michigan Law School. I stopped making donations to the Law School when it was fighting the Grutter legal action. I could not justify donating to an organization that wants to discriminate against my children because of their skin color. I found more worthy causes to support with my money and better universities to send my children to.
Me, too. I'm a 1980 grad of Princeton, and I have told them to get stuffed. The final straw was that they hired VAN JONES as a one-year visiting fellow recently.
A guy who is too lunatic for even Barack Obama to keep on board. The admin there is completely nuts. Yes, do send this essay to them, but please correct the spelling before doing so. And no, I'm not trying to be an ass.
what took you all so long? i graduated from brown in 1978 and never game them a dime. if you read "the last hurrah" there is a very accompished character who nevertheless considers his greatest accomplishment that he managed to remain a believing catholic despite having graduated harvard. look at brown now - pres ruth simmons is celebrated and nobody dare mention the fact that she sat on the goldman board of directors - took their money, did nothing to change or much less even affect their "direction". anyone screaming for her to give back this $$$ she "earned"? not a chance.
1. Is there any evidence Arab Americans (or non Americans for that matter) get disproportionately hassled by police?
2. Is there any evidence going to college successfully "indoctrinates" students with left wing views? I don't dispute that they try to, but GSS data makes it pretty clear that to the extent going to college affects ones politics, it shifts them right, not left. I suspect this is at least in part due to hamfisted attempts at indoctrination that few students take seriously, particularly coming from humanities professors. It would not occur to me to donate money to my alma mater; if the educational experience there is not worth the cost of tuition, they need to take measures that ensure it is, not beg for money. At the risk of being repetitive, I also stopped giving to my AM, Cornell. But there is a wonderful college that deserves support, Hillsdale College in Michigan. They accept no gov't funds. They don't even allow their students to. This frees them from all the gov't controls and they pursue a true liberal arts (in the classical meaning of the word) education, stressing American values. Hillsdale.edu.
I was a student at Brooklyn College 1984-6. I have so many great memories about BC. I'll never forget the beautiful campus (kind of like an ivy school) or the professors and students. Back then it was a REAL open school that didn't have this silly PC victimology garbage. The tuition was also pretty cheap, I think about $500 for a term.
I had classmates from all over the world including Israel and the Middle East. We had meaningful discussions -- on our own, in classes and during lectures -- about our differences and the problems we faced when we looked at our old societies and our new lives in America. As a Greek, I spoke to Turks about the problems our countries had. We spoke honestly and openly and we understood where we came from and where we should look to in the future. We didn't jump around making political statements with epithets or pie throwing. If I had been ORDERED to read a book about how the 400 year Muslim Turkish occupation of Greece was 'oh so wonderful' , I would never have even given any thought to any debate. Maybe I would have thrown around some curse words on the Turks but there would never have been any meaningful talk. I don't understand what has happened to Brooklyn College. I remember my professors -- many who were Orthodox Jews -- brought an analytical style of teaching to practically any class I signed up for. Now, it is just 'the evil zionazis' and here is a book you MUST read and don't you dare criticize it! Wish I could cancel my donations to BC, but I never made any because i remember an old professor who once told me 'Government institutions exist for the sake of their own existence, they do not exist to assure your existence unless you exist for their existence'. He was an Orthodox Jew who lost his entire family in the holocaust. He knew. And I know. And I will never forget that there is an ideology that seeks to destroy me and my beliefs. Is Hillsdale College in Michigan the ONLY college in the USA that does not take US Government funds?
Grove City College in Pennsylvania is a very good college and does not accept federal funds.
If you are, perhaps, tired of taking the bait---of having the discussion of political and patriotic behavior framed by the demagogues currently in control of our government institutions, of being manipulated by those in bad faith who shower us with contempt, and of being gerrymandered by tyrants who mock the freedom Americans have lived for and died for over these last centuries---perhaps you might be interested in:
hildegardes.com/I_Hear_America_Singing.htm If so, pass it on. My husband attended Brooklyn College back when it was free. He was the first member of his family to attend college, and it meant the world to him.
I've never given a dime to William and Mary and don't intend to. We have given money to our sons' college, Asbury, because we were so pleased with what they turned out.
I too am a Brooklyn alum, and I am so glad you brought this to my attention. I don't contribute much, but what little I do send will now be spent elsewhere.
I have to say, at least as a relatively recent grad (03), I am more than a bit surprised. If only because BC had such a strong Hillel precence while I was there. I attended Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Clown College and am too withholding donating. Mainly because most of the camels are imported from Middle Eastern countries.
Criswell College in Dallas, TX is private. It's a very small, conservative seminary school for those who've never heard of it.
Wait, you can only apply if you've never heard of it?
Wow, you really think your perceived offense should influence the curriculum? Get a life you bigot.
"Perceived offense"? Would you employ the same sneering attitude and "you're-a-bigot" language against Jews who took umbrage with the trend in 1920's Germany? All thoughtful people have to stand up for decency and objective truth (something foreign to you, I suspect), and I commend Bruce Kesler for doing so.
Man you got me just as I was drinking my morning coffee. If I understand you correctly, you're comparing middle class conservative white Americans to the German Jews of 1920? Are you implying that the evil forces of Islam are bearing down upon you and withing the next decade you and your family and friends are going to be murdered by the millions? Seriously? You may have taken you're argument a little to far into bizarro world. And you claim that "thoughtful people have to stand up for decency and objective truth." You must not be very thoughtful.
Oh, Spit Take, nice try. Really.
He didn't mention anything about the holocaust. He compared it to the rising anti-semitism in 1920s Germany. Well, Spit, the rising anti-semitism, and anti-israel feeling on college campuses is not deniable. Nor is the increasing enforcement of dumbed-down PC "thinking." As for the forces of Islam, you really need to look at what has happened to Europe in the last few decades. Stop worshipping your Liberal orthodoxy, and wake up and smell your morning coffee. Sharia Law is not a paranoid fantasy of "conservative white Americans." There are entire areas around Paris that the French authorities dare not enter. And, already American academia sees Islam as its latest protege. But, there have already been "honor" killings here in the USA. I know you see yourself as intellectually superior, and love to denigrate anyone who does not share your warm, fuzzy liberal fantasy world, but there really are really bad people in the world who really do want to kill us. And some of them are here now. That you are someone who cannot see a trend before it is upon you is regrettable. My law school kicked military recruiters off-campus supposedly because Don't Ask Don't Tell conflicted with the school's anti-discrimination policy. Since the Soloman Amendment means nothing to them, perhaps my contributions might. I quit donating and haven't been back.
Jerky:
"Wow, you really think your perceived offense should influence the curriculum? Get a life you bigot" I know you think that calling people names -- like "bigot" -- is rational discourse, but it's a poor, weak substitute for an actual reasoned response. Perhaps you lack the capacity for such a response. More likely, you are a victim of the very debased educational system you defend which has not taught you either analysis or critical thinking. Too bad. Political Correctness is, indeed, offensive, and antithetical to Freedom of thought, and I will not support it financially. I am sorry to say this, but I think you are making a catastrophic mistake. I am 15yrs old, and almost entire family are Brooklyn College alumni.
One of the principle ideas of a university, is academic freedom. Now you have every right to hold back your donation. However, I request that you reconsider this decision on the basis of academic freedom. I don't know how much money you intended to give them. But for argument's sake, we'll say $100,000. Now BC does not need this money terribly, from what I hear Kimmich raised quite a few of those over the years. But if this donation was significant, they might have changed this policy. Do you really think a university should give the decision for its curriculum to the highest bidder? This would destroy the very idea of a university. This would open the door wide open for other people to hold the university hostage. In Brooklyn, you know there are large ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities that send their kids to Brooklyn College. I don't mean to be bigoted but I grew up in that community, and the vast majority of them are creationists. Imagine what would happen if they held the biology departments hostage? I am not saying this is your intent. But it can indirectly lead to there. With all due repsect AS "I am sorry to say this, but I think you are making a catastrophic mistake. I am 15yrs old, and almost entire family are Brooklyn College alumni."
"One of the principle ideas of a university, is academic freedom." Academic Freedom is precisely what is rapidly disappearing from once-great institutions like BC, and that is the reason that some alumni are alarmed and disgusted. And, are withholding their money, as they should. What you call holding hostage is instead the market place speaking its displeasure. "Now you have every right to hold back your donation. However, I request that you reconsider this decision on the basis of academic freedom." Huh? Colleges and universities are increasingly crushing academic freedom in favor of political correctness, and that is why this man, and many other people are withholding their money. "I don't know how much money you intended to give them. But for argument's sake, we'll say $100,000. Now BC does not need this money terribly, from what I hear Kimmich raised quite a few of those over the years. But if this donation was significant, they might have changed this policy. Do you really think a university should give the decision for its curriculum to the highest bidder?" They already are: The Federal Government -- not to mention bending their policies to the loudest shouters. Would you be saying what you are saying if you heard that a donor was refusing to give his money to a Christian college because that college insisted on teaching Creation? Would you be calling it hostage taking? Be honest. I think you would be all in favor of him giving his own money to some other school -- and that is your right in a Free society. "This would destroy the very idea of a university. This would open the door wide open for other people to hold the university hostage." But the university is ALREADY being held hostage to LIBERAL orthodox thought, otherwise known as political correctness. Students have been expelled from graduate programs simply for having non-PC opinions. It is these champions of academic freedom who are enforcing one and only one brand of thought. "In Brooklyn, you know there are large ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities that send their kids to Brooklyn College. I don't mean to be bigoted but I grew up in that community, and the vast majority of them are creationists. Imagine what would happen if they held the biology departments hostage?" I don't have to imagine. The biology departments are ALREADY held hostage -- by evolutionists. I grew up believing evolution until I went to college and studied it under professors who believed it. I came to see what scientific nonsense it is, but I do not call for the firing, and banning of people who still believe it, because I actually DO believe in academic freedom. You seem to think that you do, too, but do you? In practice? I was appalled to find that much of the "evidence" used to teach me evolution is, in fact, false. That species remain remarkably stable. That even when they suffer great insult, and adapt via Natural Selection -- which is NOT evolution -- to environmental changes, they REVERT to their original form when the environmental insult is over. If Evolution is true the earth should be littered with almost infinite numbers and types of transitional forms -- but it isn't. You don't have to believe in the entirely reasonable idea that G-d created it all. But please do take an honest look at what is really going on in academia. Academic Freedom it ain't. "In Brooklyn, you know there are large ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities that send their kids to Brooklyn College. I don't mean to be bigoted but I grew up in that community, and the vast majority of them are creationists. Imagine what would happen if they held the biology departments hostage?" You say you don't "mean" to be bigoted, but then you are. You postulate this large number of creationist Jews doing something they manifestly have NOT done, and then shudder in horror at YOUR own thought. All the while it is Creationists who actually ARE being shut out, which bothers you not at all. It is the LEFT which enforces correctness of thought, my young friend, not academic freedom. It is right there in what you wrote. Freedom. Words MEAN things, young A.S. I'm sorry, Mr Kesler, that you are under the impression that your money gives you a right to dictate curriculum. It seems you've spent far too long in the corporate world where that kind of thinking prevails. Far better that you return to Brooklyn College for a few semesters and get to know its current students. Perhaps your critical thinking--clearly dulled with time--might be rejuvenated as you realize that your way of thinking is not the only way.
It's unfortunate that public universities are paying the price for corporate malfeasance in this country. Though somewhat tangential to your point, it is relevant. Lastly, I will not accept any student paper citing your page in any paper for the university classes in which I teach. It provides absolutely no information about you whatsoever, so it is simply anecdotal. For all I know, you're in the basement next door to Wayne and Garth. Steve:
"I'm sorry, Mr Kesler, that you are under the impression that your money gives you a right to dictate curriculum" No, Steve. Interesting how you twist ideas. He didn't dictate anything except where his money goes. I realize that this is a foreign concept to someone such as yourself. And, I nearly gagged with laughter at this: "... as you realize that your way of thinking is not the only way." Speaking of sources, care to back this up? "It's unfortunate that public universities are paying the price for corporate malfeasance in this country." Bill Smith: As naive as they are, today's students have infinitely more compassion and intelligence than the bitter, intolerant folks like you who are rejoicing in keeping their donations from state schools that have been eviscerated by a government reeling from corporate malfeasance.
If you need a footnote for that, pick up any newspaper in any language anywhere in the world from any date over the last eight years. And you can employ all the arrogance and sarcasm you wish. Your money is still staying here when you go. Steve, you seem to think that name-calling has some kind of persuasive power. It doesn't. Nor does your breathless, righteous indignation. It also doesn't cover up the fact that you have no other argument except this "corporate malfeasance."
Please describe an instance. Thank you Bruce!
This is the only chance we have is to take back our colleges from the far left. As a Catholic I could not believe when Notre Dame honored President Obama. That is in part why I support a real Catholic college - Franciscan University of Steubenville. Alumni across the country must stand up and remind their universities what being a place of higher learning is all about. It is not indoctrination or political correctness. Truth within academic freedom. For only the truth can set you free. i wonder if you protested the handing out of Angela's Ashes as vociferously as you did with this year's book? You state there was no one perspective promoted at your college when you attended. I find that extremely hard to believe. There is always a social and cultural current that is at the forefront in any given year. You might want to rethink your youth without the rose colored lenses provided by the passage of time.
Steven: I don't know where or when you went to college, but as I said there was no political nor cultural party line at Brooklyn College when i attended in the '60s.
There was open and civil debates among some political views, ignored by the majority there to just get a quality education. And there were no required, sole, one-sided political books to read. For example, the much-liked leading self-avowed Marxist on campus, a prof. in the Economics Dept. was highly respected for his unbiased survey of the variety of economic thought. Do you know how debate works? Do you even understand the purpose of the "common reader"?! There is no indoctrination afoot. The idea is to provide students with a common work which is thought provoking, challenging... creating potential for debate, for discussion, for comparison.
This common reader is PART OF the overall curriculum. It is inserted into a LARGER context. If a student mindlessly accepts idea, guess what? Those are BAD STUDENTS. This is most definitely NOT the intention of including the common reader (whatever it is) as part of the first-year curriculum. By the way, I am apparently one of these faculty that are indoctrinating the students with these Death to Israel messages.... if they try to express an alternative viewpoint, I'm going to make sure they know they will fail the course! Oh wait, NO, that would be almost as ridiculous as your position. Tyler:
You wrote: "I am apparently one of these faculty that are indoctrinating the students with these Death to Israel messages.... if they try to express an alternative viewpoint, I'm going to make sure they know they will fail the course!" Are you REALLY this ignorant of what is, and has been going on on college campuses for years? If YOU don't know that precisely what you present above as preposterous is, in fact, actually HAPPENING -- and happening a lot -- WHY don't you know? Hmmm? We know! Why don't you? And, NO, I'm not going to do your research for you at 3:30 AM, and provide you citations. I and most of the people on here already have seen this happening, and it is WHY we are withholding our money. Again, Prof. Tyler, why don't you know? Your professed -- heh heh -- ignorance is simply MORE reason to stop giving money to such manifestly ignorant, and incompetent faculty. Students ARE being shouted down in class. They ARE being failed for expressing views contrary to the prof's line. Why do you think people are withholding their money? Do you think we all, spread out across the country, just decided to make this all up?!! I disinherited BC long ago after they initiated open admissions and destroyed the BA and MS I received there.The school has never been the same.This one sided action is very consistent with all the policies and curriculums of many schools these days. The college is just going further into the abyss and will never reclaim the kind of student that went there in the 40-60's.Shame on Brooklyn College and please dont ask me for money anymore. It will take the entire distinguished alumni to hopefully change the course of this school
I disagree with you on two points.
(1) By the looks of your website you do not have the means to make a "significant donation." But of course it makes sense you'd say that as you're trying to scare BC into pulling the book. (2) Hate crimes have risen in NYC. There ARE more attacks on gay people, transgender people, Jews, immigrants (esp. Mexicans) and Arabs/Muslims. Definitely temples HAVE seen an upswing in vandalism. These are all terrible. But, for anyone living in NYC, I think we've all SEEN Muslim-appearing people singled out for esp. pervasive abuse. Not in a classroom with just words. But on the streets & subways with violent people screaming and following them. I personally try and sit next to them on the subway & try to use my white skin privilege & friendliness to dissuade attacks. I have done this for Orthodox Jews and feminine gay men, but not nearly as much as recent times for people appearing (to bigots) as Muslims (but yes you are right, they are often just Arab and Christian). Thank you for the dialogue, but PLEASE stop underestimating the incredible stigma AND PHYSICAL VIOLENCE occurring right now in epidemic proportions in NYC. This is not occurring anywhere nearly as much against Jews. (It may well be against feminine-appearing/MTFT men of color.) Dawn:
I don't know what the appearance of the website may indicate or has to do with the personal finances of the accomplished professionals who blog there, for free, which belongs to someone other than I. I do commend you for lending your "white skin privilege." I've done the same, many times, in more ways than just sitting next to someone. More should. - I will add that I've often seen or benefitted from others of color lending theirs to Whites or to me when the mix of colors is not White. Umm... but sharing the experiences of a small group of these people of color (most of which sharing a particular faith) is not beneficial and requires a "counterpoint" in order to make it not radical indoctrination?
Is there potentially controversial book that wouldn't require such a counterpoint? Is there something that better reflects American Values that is thought provoking? I went to Brooklyn College and for the first time since I graduated I can say that with pride. I hope this book helps students become open minded so that they don't turn into close minded people like you. You can keep your money...
You may have also endorsed Michelle Obama's comment that, with her husband's nomination for President, for the first time she was proud of America.
It seems that her privileges and your education, otherwise, don't account for much, huh? I hope you weren't an English major.
That should be "closed minded." Do you really not know what you said in your first sentence? OK...
It says that -- previously -- you were NOT able to say with pride that you graduated from BC. That may not be what you meant to say, but it is what you wrote. Curious. Not that it matters, but I've always had neutral feelings about Brooklyn College (didn't hate it, didn't love it). But asking the incoming freshmen class to read this book is a step toward integrating the class and bringing people together. I'm glad that this book was chosen and I hope they continue choosing such books in the future. Remember, the point of college education is to be challenged, to broaden your horizons and to grow as an individual. And Brooklyn College is helping its students do just that!
#39.2.1.1.1
Alice
on
2010-09-02 15:36
(Reply)
"Not that it matters, but I've always had neutral feelings about Brooklyn College ..."
If those are your feelings, they matter. And, I agree that reading a book together, and discussing and analyzing it is a good idea. Unfortunately, too often, on too many campuses, the "integrating the class and bringing people together" part is a cover for plain and simple indoctrination where conformity of thought is enforced. If that was not your experience when you were in school, I am glad, but it IS what is happening now in too many places, and that is what people are upset about. Please consider that simply because people disagree with you does not mean their minds are closed to any and all new information. It may simply mean that, after due consideration, they have made up their minds. Accusing them of closed mindedness right off the bat is very weak compared to presenting an opposing idea, but it seems to be what passes for "free and open exchange of ideas" these days. Please also bear in mind that while all of us have an equal right to HAVE an idea or opinion, it does not follow that all ideas and opinions are therefore of equal value, or of equal validity -- just because someone has them.
#39.2.1.1.1.1
Bill Smith
on
2010-09-02 18:58
(Reply)
It's interesting that you criticize Alice's commentary ("Accusing them of closed mindedness right off the bat is very weak"), but don't criticize Mr. Kesler's comment on Alice's original thought ("You may have also endorsed Michelle Obama's comment that..."), which is far more weak and trite. And I won't even get into your correction of her grammar...
I think the essential argument here is, in fact, the choice of book and whether it is appropriate. I think we all agree that the concept, making these kids all read one book, common experience, etc., is a good one. That being said, what is actually wrong with this book? And why the word "indoctrination" without any proof of, what that really means, teaching without discussion? Why is it you all assume that the teachers at BC won't let these kids discuss it? You say "but it IS what is happening now in too many places", but offer no proof...a link to an article maybe? I, along with Alice, did not experience this in college...this is YOUR opinion, which, like ours, you've clearly stated may or may not be valid or have any value. And why do you think that a population of kids, mostly from NYC, wouldn't know a thing or two about 9/11, the Muslim religion, other cultures that live in their own neighborhood, etc? Why no benefit of the doubt that these kids will argue their own point of view? Why the belief that the professors wouldn't let them? That is my opposing opinion...that there is no proof of indoctrination at BC and there is no proof of spineless students that will just take being spoonfed someone else's opinion, not in NYC anyway. I see no proof in the pudding...
#39.2.1.1.1.1.1
CJP - Current Brooklynite
on
2010-09-03 09:57
(Reply)
Whether it is successful indoctrination or an attempt at indoctrination is immaterial. What is material is that a one-sided book about a contentious issue, a serious one, is what the college chose as the sole one distributed to students and is a reading in the required English course.
It is a poor choice. Further, while many, I hope most, students may have alternative information of their own, many, I hope not most, do not. The college has not provided contending information. That makes it official college policy not to provide the materials for informed civil discussion.
#39.2.1.1.1.1.1.1
Bruce Kesler
on
2010-09-03 10:10
(Reply)
The only professor that you, I would understand although not agree, could accuse of attempted indoctrination would be the author. However, he is NOT the professor of any of these English classes, only someone who comes in to discuss the book from time to time and is available for questions, from what the college explained.
Therefore, how can you possibly accuse the entire English department staff of BC of attempted indoctrination? What would their motive be, assuming that most of them are not Muslims and/or Arabs? They might be left wing liberals or what have you, or they might not be, but that doesn't mean they bring it to the classroom or even agree with the politics as they are laid out in the book. Again, there is no proof of this... And, I wholeheartedly disagree with your assessment of today's youth...they have information, literally, at their fingertips via the internet and in their communities, whether from NYC or not. They are far more informed, for their age, than any of us adults ever were! Don't sell them so short!
#39.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
CJP - Current Brooklynite
on
2010-09-03 10:24
(Reply)
Prof. Bayoumi is a member of the English Dept., duh, which chose his book, coinkeydink huh.
Whether today's students are or not better informed than earlier generations, that is not furthered by they being given by the college a one-sided book, and no other.
#39.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Bruce Kesler
on
2010-09-03 10:35
(Reply)
There are 3000-3500 incoming freshmen...assuming class sizes of 30-50, there have to be around 60-100 classes of English 1 (or whatever this class is called) to be taught. They could not all possibly be taught by one single professor. I don't know what kind of work you are in, but I have lots of co-workers with whom I share nothing in common as far as politics are concerned. You are basically assuming that every professor in the English dept., which has to have 30-50 professors, is in agreement with Prof. Bayoumi and his politics and every word he has written in this book. I fail to see how this is possible. Again, there is no proof of this and, especially at BC, where there is a large contigent of Jewish professors, it is even less likely.
Also, it is not odd for a college to use textbooks written by their professors. In fact, it makes good business sense. But that is an entirely different discussion... For Bill Smith, I won't pander to your comments, but there is my logic. Do the math...you are incriminating people for discussing a book that you don't agree with and associating them with Prof. Bayoumi, by default, without individually assessing their credentials and/or political affiliations. You are just assuming they share his opinion, which is unfair, at best.
#39.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
CJP - Current Brooklynite
on
2010-09-03 11:38
(Reply)
Please look up the word "pander" -- and "incriminate" while you're at it.
"...you are incriminating people for discussing a book..." No, I am criticizing the institution for presenting only this one quite slanted book. You are apparently not familiar with what has been going on on college campuses for years, and so, I guess, may be forgiven for not getting the issue, and thinking that fair, reasoned discussions where students with views opposed to the book's and the prof's will be fairly heard. They likely will not be. I wouldn't have a problem with this one book in a seminar course for older students, but as the one, single book for incoming freshmen who are still young, and inexperienced? Unfair, and inappropriate. IMO deliberately so. "The only professor that you, I would understand although not agree, could accuse of attempted indoctrination would be the author."
Are you serious? That's like saying we can only blame the distiller, not the driver in a drunk driving accident. Mr. Kessler has been quite clear. You can refuse facts and logic, but that does not change them. You make no sense. So, the distiller...that would be Prof. Bayoumi.
However, there is a bartender...the professor that teaches the class, who is NOT Prof. Bayoumi. Then the driver, the student. Are you incriminating the student for being served by the bartender? Or are you incriminating an unknown, unaffiliated bartender, the professor, for serving up Bayoumi's book? Is that really fair and do we know, does this bartender have stock in the distiller's company? Maybe, but likely not...the professor teaching this class has no motive, other than being a coworker of Prof. Bayoumi's, to discuss this book in other than an objective manner. As if discussing any other book...
#39.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1
CJP - Current Brooklynite
on
2010-09-03 11:45
(Reply)
Sorry that some miss the facts:
The committee that chose the book is from the English Dept., where Prof. Bayoumi teaches. The college has not revealed the members of the committee. The book is also a reading in the required English course that all students must take, as well as the sole book provided to all incoming students.
#39.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1
Bruce Kesler
on
2010-09-03 11:51
(Reply)
"..the professor teaching this class has no motive, other than being a coworker of Prof. Bayoumi's, to discuss this book in other than an objective manner."
You are right. The professors SHOULD behave as you describe. Alas, it is clear that you also haven't been following the discussion here, or what has been going on in academia. That being the case, I bid you farewell. You are wise not to get into my criticism of her grammar, because you would lose.
A door is open. Or, it is C L O S E D. Not "close." A mind is open. A mind is closed. See how that works? I'll start out as saying, I don't know who you are, I don't read your blog and I only know what I've read in the papers here in NYC. I have no affiliation with BK College nor any newspaper. However, I have lived in Brooklyn for the past 11 years.
I do have some questions...one would be, when's the last time you were in NYC, specifically Brooklyn? Also, when's the last time you lived in NYC, specifically Brooklyn? My folks grew up here (I'm in my 30s) and I grew up in the burbs, but I have a pretty good idea what BK was like in 1940s (from my folks who lived here until the 70s) until the present. It has changed quite a bit from when you were here, I can guarantee you that. Not only is it more diverse, but it's a million times more diverse than where you live in CA, where I have friends that live close by and I have visited many times. We have more cultures intertwined than you can shake a stick at! We have Metrocard machines in some 30+ languages in subway stations! Now, that being said, most of the kids that go to BK College, from what I understand, come from the surrounding area...NYC Metro area, if you will. They live amongst many immigrants, of many different socio-economic standings and were likely in NYC when 9/11 happened, although probably only 7 or 8 years old. My guess is they have a way better understanding of those events than you do. I'm sure they have heard lots about it from their parents as well as their communities and their pre-college educators. Also, as a resident of BK at the time, I can assure you that I saw, on multiple occasions, on subways, in the supermarket, on a ferry from Long Island to Connecticut and in bars and restaurants, people of Arab descent (and some who just looked Arab) faced with discrimination, from being randomly cursed at and spit on to actually being asked to leave private establishments. Now, mind you, none of this happened to me...I'm a white guy. But I witnessed it, as did friends of mine. And, for a period, I'd say a year-ish after 9/11, it did happen. It may not have been in the papers, it may not have happened in CA or other places in the country, but I can certainly attest to the fact that it did happen in NYC. People were upset, I don't find it that odd, although it was upsetting to see. What's fascinating to me, mostly, is how little benefit of the doubt you give these kids...they can't think for themselves? This isn't a textbook on calculus where there is "no discussion" of the content. The purpose of this book is two fold...one is to have the whole freshman class have a common experience, the second, to give them something to discuss in class. This isn't fiction either...these are true accounts, but I think it's pretty clear that any conclusions drawn in the book, after reading it, are of the authors. I'm not an English major, but I did go to college and they taught me not only how to comprehend what I read, but also to be able to tell the difference between opinion and fact. I don't think the book really hides the fact that these are opinion. I won't tell you what to do with your money, and I have doubts that it is actually "significant" to BK College, but it's clear that you don't trust academia to cater to the kids of the current generation and what's really going on in their world and the one they're going to enter as adults in a few years. This was a rather thin book review. I can't tell what your beef is. Did you even read the book?
As a current student, who has paid for every semester I attended with my own money, I would tell Mr. Kesler to keep his money. You are pulling your donation because of one book!!! America has created a society of me-me sissies who throw temper tantrums for every petty unmerited detail. It's disgusting, and you didn't even have the discretion to quietly rescind your commitment. I wonder if you ever took the time to visit the campus to judge Professor Bayoumi's classroom style or even attempted to speak with some of his current and past students to inquire about the the quality of his classes and teaching method. Its one thing to be a bigot, its another thing entirely to be bigot who is unable to see his own true reflection.
If one particular author happens to have political/social views that are "anti-Israel" or "anti-zionist", how should that disqualify his scholarly works from being taught? Certainly there are a number of authors who hold controversial views, so what?
What I have a problem with is the constant hysteria thrown by zionists and zionist groups in the US. You people are McCarthy-like in your censorship of views that support the Palestinian struggle (and trust me, I went to a very pro-zionist university in Los Angeles for two years. As someone coming from Noam Chomsky's neck of the woods, I was horrified, which was part of the reason I transfered out. The liberal arts college I'm at now doesn't even have Hillel). Why can't you just accept the fact that students in most colleges in the USA are going to hear ideas that may not go along with yours? If you truly believe all the "democratic" values you claim Israel represents (which is a joke in itself - what state has ever been a truly democratic institution???) why not act on them? As a college student, I can say that most of the readings we get have some kind of political or social message imbedded in them. When I was at Cal State, we read a book critical of the capitalist system (Ehrenreich's "Nickeled and Dimed"). At McDaniel we read all kinds of texts that convey a social/political/philosophical message regardless as to whether or not we agree with them. Hey, THIS IS COLLEGE. We're only here to expand our horizons. If we disagree with something, we speak out about it in class, not send a billion Emails demanding that the school remove the text out of some unfound paranoia. Oh and for the record, I do not believe Israel has the "right to exist"; I don't believe any state has a legitimate or moral "right to exist". The people who worship the State - almost like a secular religion - are sadly misinformed. Julia:
"If one particular author happens to have political/social views that are "anti-Israel" or "anti-zionist", how should that disqualify his scholarly works from being taught." Amazing. Are you deliberately missing the point, or are you so poorly educated that you truly do not see it, even though it has been explained multiple times here? BALANCE is what we want, and clearly stated. But you prefer to erect a straw man, and then to condemn that. Chomsky, eh? It shows, believe me. You couldn't get, or be honest about the central FACT of this discussion. I will let others disassemble your tragically muddled views on Israel. Do you and Mr. Kesler really view the students of Brooklyn College as so incompetent that we need out an out of town alum to control what is taught to us? That's whats amazing! This is a joke. The two of you should have more faith in the brillant minds that sit in Professor Bayoumi's classes and let the educational and administrative professionals of Brooklyn College do their jobs.
No, we don't view the students at Brooklyn College to be "incompetent."
We expect the college to provide balanced and empirically backed texts, not one-sided propaganda as the sole required reading, so the competent can have a better basis for decisions and opinions. Some students in Prof. Bayoumi's class rate him an interesting teacher, some opine that he doesn't handle opposing views well and that his class belongs in the Poli Sci department more than the English. I view you as inexperienced STUDENTS, who yet seem to think you already know everything. You, having not gone to college 20, 30, or 40 years ago have NO basis for comparison, whereas we do, and it's not fun.
I have to tell you that if the written responses I see here that are purportedly written by students are examples of what passes for analytical thinking, and discourse on today's campuses, you all are NOT getting what you are paying for, and I, for one will not support it financially. Let someone else pay for straw men and red herrings. Please note: Where I live is irrelevant ("out of town.") I most certainly will control what I give my money to. Were did you get the idea that you are entitled to it? As for the educational and administrative professionals of too many schools, they have manifestly not been doing their jobs. You disagree, and that is your right, but I do have a question. At what age do you expect that all your knowledge and experience in the real world -- that you have yet to acquire -- will decay? When will you, too, have moved too far away from BC, and be too old and experienced to have anything worthwhile to say to brilliant young minds such as yourself? When will that inevitable slide into irrelevance, and incompetence claim YOU, Robert? Or, will you -- unlike Mr. Kessler and I -- continue to grow, learn, get more and more experienced, and thus have a more informed opinion than you do right now, Robert? And if you see developments over time you don't like at your old school -- perhaps it's been taken over by some one-sided faction that appalls you -- will you feel entitled to speak up, and withhold your money? Or, will you docilely conclude that your intellectual powers have waned, and that 18 - 24 year-old students MUST know more than you have by then learned? And, that this one-sided faction that appalls you MUST know more than you know. What age will you be, Robert, when you concede that you have suddenly become incompetent? And, how do university professors escape this same deterioration? Here, Robert is a grand father who apparently also sees what I and Mr. Kessler see:
getalifeprowl 09/07/2010 8:51 AM When reading this letter one can't help but understand why our students are so poorly educated. I have grandchildren who are college students whose basic knowledge is comparable to a 7th grader in the 50's. I'm appalled and disgusted. Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/letters/mis_blaming_book_N2VPGqxcbkbNhtzT2P9dnM?sms_ss=email#ixzz0ytRaSYiB Hello Mr. Kessler,
My name is Melissa Colorado, I am currently a Broadcast Journalism student at Brooklyn College. I would greatly appreciate it if I could interview you via Skype for a Brooklyn College TV story regarding this blog post. Thank you for your cooperation. Best, Melissa Colorado 646-823-6033 mjc492@gmail.com melissa.colorado@nbcuni.com This whole thing is ridiculous. Even if you happened to find Bayoumi's work offensive in some way (which is really a stretch if you actually take the time to read it and have an open mind about things), the whole point of scholarly learning is to be able to discriminate between fact and opinion, and to be able to construct valid arguments analyzing the merits or errors of an argument. It's not like everyone agrees with the Communist Manifesto, but it's assigned reading in thousands of classrooms around the world. Why? Because it is important to read outside of one's sphere of comfort and to learn to critique pieces of writing. Just because we read something we don't agree with in class, it doesn't mean we should complain to the college administration or on a blog or go to the press. It's childish and promotes close-mindedness and ignorance.
Is the Communist Manifesto the sole reading distributed, without others of context or critique?
Apparently everything is open for discussion except the Bible. I don't believe those that pick the curriculum would choose Genesis as required reading which clearly states that the Land of Israel is the Promised Land.
Promised to Whom you may ask? Promised to the seed of Abraham Isaac and Jacob as an eternal inheritance and not the Palestinians who have no clear roots whatsoever. This G-dly Covenant with the Nation of Israel comes with the understanding that the Israelites, must obey the commandments in the Torah which include observing commandments specific with living on the Land. Palestinians do not have the inclination or desire or obligation to keep these commandments but Jews do . The Nation of Israel are the ones that are divinely entitled to the Land and it is through their being and living on the Land and observing the commandments that the entire world is blessed. This is not my opinion. It is clearly stated in the Torah. I don't believe that Brooklyn College will include in their curriculum, passages in the Bible that clearly delineates boundaries of the Land of Israel prior to the Israelite's entry into their Promised Land which clearly includes all of Judea and Samaria . The concept of Israel "occupying territories" in Judea and Samaria is not based on truth according to the Bible. It is rather the Palestinians who have stolen the heritage of Jews and present their case as fact. The omission of any requirement of the freshman class at Brooklyn College to read about Jewish entitlement to the Land of Israel based on the Bible yet requires them to read about the victimization of Palestinians and their legitimate rights in "occupied territories" is extremely painful to the large segment of Orthodox Jews who happen to live in the surrounding communities of Boro Park and Flatbush and attend Brooklyn College. Let me add that a very large percentage of the population that attends Brooklyn College is Jewish. Many Orthodox Jews. This choice of book clearly shows a lack of sensitivity to the beliefs and values of the Jewish Population in Brooklyn College and the surrounding community. It is extremely disturbing especially in light of the controversy going on regarding building a mosque at Ground Zero on the site of 9/11. Incidentally, this argument of diversity and multiculturalism is used there as well. Islam is the least tolerant of all religions. Jewish and Christian prayer is forbidden on Temple Mount under the Waqf. Mass of expulsions of Jews from Arab countries happened immediately following 1967, the 6 day War. Jews were forced to flee with the clothes on their backs from Muslim countries. It is doubly painful since we know there is also a large secular Jewish community attending Brooklyn College who are not familiar with their own heritage and will be hearing about how Palestinians are victimized and will somehow be convinced, due to lack of a balanced curriculum to turn against their fellow Jew with J'Accuse depending also on the slant of the Professor. Diversity and multiculturalism has turned into the exact opposite. Anyone that represents opposing cultures/beliefs/values that refuse to be melted into this concept of "diversity and multiculturism" is excluded and/or not allowed freedom of expression on the same level as those that espouse "diversity and multiculturalism". In fact "diversity and multiculturalism" is usually a smokescreen for a group that wishes to stifle opposition of their own beliefs and values. Others will be allowed expression only in a controlled environment where they have to be somehow subordinate in presentation in order to ensure that their views do not have the same convincing intensity or in any way overpower the views represented by those that run the forum, debate and curriculum. This is the reason why this book is indoctrinating. Its message is mutually exclusive from the Jewish message based on the Torah. Only their misguided position will be recommended required reading in the curriculum. Yet both positions can not be truth simultaneously. Entitlement to ones home or birthright is not open for discussion. There is a deed that clearly states who the rightful owner is. Such is the case with the Land of Israel. The Torah is not up for dispute or negotiation. Will the position of the Bible at the very least be given equal time and be recommended required reading at Brooklyn College or order to present a balanced picture? G-d forbid! |
Bruce Kesler won't be giving any money any time soon: I Just Disinherited My Alma Mater I just updated my will and trust and, with heavy heart, cut out what was a significant bequest to my alma mater, Brooklyn College....
Tracked: Aug 28, 13:53
Tracked: Aug 28, 17:24
Bruce Kesler at Maggie's Farm has just disinheirited his alma mater, Brooklyn College over the academic bias and indoctrination that has replaced education. As is usually the case, the College claims to be interested in diversity while allowing unchallenged anti-American and anti-Israel bias. Well good for Bruce. In my case,...
Tracked: Aug 28, 20:18
Since last Friday, when I wrote why I Just Disinherited My Alma Mater, the post has had “legs” about what I and others say is politicized indoctrination as official college policy. Brooklyn College requires incoming freshmen and transfer students t
Tracked: Aug 31, 09:49
Since last Friday, when I wrote why I Just Disinherited My Alma Mater, the post has had “legs” about what I and others say is politicized indoctrination as official college policy. Brooklyn College requires incoming freshmen and transfer st
Tracked: Aug 31, 09:51
Since last Friday, when I wrote why I Just Disinherited My Alma Mater, the post has had “legs” about what I and others say is politicized indoctrination as official college policy. Brooklyn College requires incoming freshmen and transfer students
Tracked: Aug 31, 09:54
Since last Friday, when I wrote why I Just Disinherited My Alma Mater, the post has had “legs” about what I and others say is politicized indoctrination as official college policy. Brooklyn College requires incoming freshmen and transfer students t
Tracked: Aug 31, 10:02
Since last Friday, when I wrote why I Just Disinherited My Alma Mater, the post has had “legs” about what I and others say is politicized indoctrination as official college policy. Brooklyn College requires incoming freshmen and transfer students t
Tracked: Aug 31, 10:42
Since last Friday, when I wrote why I Just Disinherited My Alma Mater, the post has had “legs” about what I and others say is politicized indoctrination as official college policy. Brooklyn College requires incoming freshmen and transfer students t
Tracked: Sep 01, 23:05
This weeks' Watcher's Council nominations are up. Council Submissions The Colossus of Rhodey - Islamophobia Right Truth - Look For Another Lawsuit or Two Bookworm Room - Zoning, religion, guns and the Bill of Rights VA Right - NYC Cabbie Slashed by Drunken Nutjob - Left Wing Media Makes Up the Rest Rhymes With Right - Fisking Bloomberg Joshuapundit - 'Progressives Need A Palin Of Their Own?' The Glittering Eye - The Conflict Between Egalitarian Policies and Abandoning Commodity Products Snapped Shot - Back! Wolf Howling - Obama Prostrates America before the UN Human Rights Council Non - Council Submissions...
Tracked: Sep 02, 05:58
Tracked: Sep 03, 06:57
Tracked: Sep 07, 09:14
The New York Daily News editorial today is titled "Academically incorrect: Brooklyn College book choice makes a mockery of education."This comes in reaction to my blog posts (here, here and here), which the New York Post, New York Times, and many oth
Tracked: Sep 07, 19:46
The New York Daily News editorial today is titled "Academically incorrect: Brooklyn College book choice makes a mockery of education."This comes in reaction to my blog posts (here, here and here), which the New York Post, New York Times, and many oth
Tracked: Sep 07, 20:18
The New York Daily News editorial today is titled "Academically incorrect: Brooklyn College book choice makes a mockery of education."This comes in reaction to my blog posts (here, here and here), which the New York Post, New York Times, an
Tracked: Sep 08, 09:18
Since last Friday, when I wrote why I Just Disinherited My Alma Mater, the post has had “legs” about what I and others say is politicized indoctrination as official college policy. Brooklyn College requires incoming freshmen and transfer st
Tracked: Sep 09, 05:55
The New York Daily News editorial today is titled "Academically incorrect: Brooklyn College book choice makes a mockery of education."This comes in reaction to my blog posts (here, here and here), which the New York Post, New York Times, an
Tracked: Sep 15, 10:24
Brooklyn College English professor Moustafa Bayoumi’s books continue to be at the center of whether fact or fiction will prevail at Brooklyn College. This might even be viewed as indicative of the wider struggle within US academia over the influence of th
Tracked: Oct 14, 17:02
Brooklyn College English professor Moustafa Bayoumi’s books continue to be at the center of whether fact or fiction will prevail at Brooklyn College. This might even be viewed as indicative of the wider struggle within US academia over the influence of th
Tracked: Oct 14, 17:36
Brooklyn College English professor Moustafa Bayoumi’s books continue to be at the center of whether fact or fiction will prevail at Brooklyn College. This might even be viewed as indicative of the wider struggle within US academia over the influence of th
Tracked: Oct 14, 17:51
Brooklyn College English professor Moustafa Bayoumi’s books continue to be at the center of whether fact or fiction will prevail at Brooklyn College. This might even be viewed as indicative of the wider struggle within US academia over the influence of th
Tracked: Oct 14, 18:18
Tracked: Oct 15, 06:28
Brooklyn College English professor Moustafa Bayoumi’s books continue to be at the center of whether fact or fiction will prevail at Brooklyn College. This might even be viewed as indicative of the wider struggle within US academia over the influence of th
Tracked: Oct 15, 10:55
Brooklyn College English professor Moustafa Bayoumi’s books continue to be at the center of whether fact or fiction will prevail at Brooklyn College. This might even be viewed as indicative of the wider struggle within US academia over the influence of th
Tracked: Oct 15, 10:58
Brooklyn College English professor Moustafa Bayoumi’s books continue to be at the center of whether fact or fiction will prevail at Brooklyn College. This might even be viewed as indicative of the wider struggle within US academia over the influence of th
Tracked: Oct 25, 15:11
The following post has just gone up at New Criterion's blog, Arma Virumque, one of the most prestigious in the blogosphere. The editor, Roger Kimball, also runs Encounter Books, one of the best sources for serious considerations of issues. I am most
Tracked: Feb 25, 12:27
Tracked: Feb 25, 21:31
Tracked: Mar 16, 05:17
Last year’s choice by my alma mater CUNY’s Brooklyn College of the sole Common Reading book distributed to all incoming students for discussion and work in required English classes was particularly marred by the author’s additions of anti-US an
Tracked: Aug 05, 15:10
Tracked: Aug 06, 06:20
Tracked: Aug 06, 06:20