Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Tuesday, May 18. 2010Relationship Templates, Part 1. Why new relationships tend to be old relationshipsI have been working on ways of talking about personality traits and relationships which avoid all psychobabble, fancy convoluted theorizing, and obscure terminology and latinate or greekified jargon. That means trying to invent better, more intuitive, metaphors. This is just a first draft to help get me thinking about what it is I really want to say - For 40 or 50 years, Psychiatry and especially Psychoanalysis has tended to view the formation of a person - their pathology and their normality - as being founded in their relationships during development. I do not agree with that premise. However, as a shrink I am naturally interested in peoples' relationships. It's one of the main topics I listen to, and it is one of the main arenas in which people live out their personality tendencies, for better or worse.
Everybody has had the experience of seeing an old friend after many years, and thinking "Gee, we picked up just where we left off ten years ago." Or, even more commonly, "I feel a bit like a 14 year-old or a 16 year-old when I spend time with my parents." It's neither a good nor a bad thing; it's just a fact that we have a limited number of relationship templates on hand to apply to our different sorts of relationships, and we tend to keep using the same ones. Often, in Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis, this is termed "transference." I just call it recycling of old templates. Mental efficiency, however imperfect. Sometimes we are forced to form new ones, regardless of our age. Getting a new sibling requires a new one (an evil and unwelcome interloper), becoming a parent requires new ones, as does becoming a grandparent or an in-law. New love relationships sometimes do, but more often tend to draw on past templates, modified a bit, and superimposed on a new relationship. Even a new house dog demands a new template (unless one imposes one of one's human templates on the relationship - as I do. I seem to use my "toddler" template for dogs.). Sometimes we do things on purpose to create new, more mature or more satisfying templates for our arsenal, or to adjust old ones (relationship templates have wiggle room on the edges). That's one of the purposes of marriage encounter, marital therapy, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, etc. Much of what can feel sterile in relationships is our clinging to old templates - clinging for comfort and familiarity. People usually form new relationships on their pre-existing templates, and the lack of perfect "fit" of mental template to reality is what makes for all the fun and challenge and mess. (You can generalize that metaphor to lots of things in life...most of what we do and how we do it is from an existing pattern.) Humans stick to their patterns most of the time - creatures of habit - and usually prefer venturing outside of them (adventure) to a limited extent - just enough to keep it interesting, depending on where one falls on the timidity-recklessness spectrum. More later about what our templates are made of...
Posted by Dr. Joy Bliss
in Our Essays, Psychology, and Dr. Bliss
at
13:35
| Comments (11)
| Trackback (1)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Wow! What an interesting way to describe relationships. I like the idea of template that we apply to each new and old relationship, and have observed that my parents can't seem to break out of the "teenager" template with me, though I'm 50 years old. Also have that "fixed" template I apply to some of my old friendships. I'll definitely have to think about how my marital template has or has not changed shape over 27 years.
There are few things more strenuous, and yet more invigorating, than the work of a person who has done some honest, productive therapy applying their version of the "new template" to whatever situation it is in their life that needs improving.
Even if you are temperamentally the kind of person who "things happen to" rather than the kind who "makes things happen," you will be amazed at the power you have to change the way you relate to others. The "others" may not like it. You know what I see when I see a long-married person suddenly undone with passion for someone not his/her spouse? A person whose heart has gone stagnant, and who's obedient enough to virtue not to abandon the spouse but not emotionally courageous enough to find a way to keep his heart alive. He's plodding along, obeying the rules but suffering from a deadness of spirit. In that condition, he's a complete sucker for a brand-new illicit relationship that makes him feel alive.
The fitting of 'templates' sounds similar to Transactional Analysis.
Speaking of templates, what is your opinion on Myers-Briggs? > For 40 or 50 years, Psychiatry and especially
> Psychoanalysis has tended to view the formation of a > person - their pathology and their normality - as being > founded in their relationships during development. I do > not agree with that premise. So you first say you don't agree with templates, then spend the rest of the article saying you do agree with them. So maybe you elaborate in your next post? My understanding of psychotherapy (at least the deep kind) is to "re-learn" and create a new template, sort of what you say here, and my personal experience of therapy was going that direction when I got unexpectedly terminated (so it unfortunately reinforced my template to avoid trusting people - oh well) I think I said that I do not think that these templates are foundational re personality.
Sorry I missed the subtlety.
So if I had a different relationship with my mother, father, etc. I would be the same person with the same personality. But how I relate to others would be different. So personalities and relationships are separate but interlocking systems that influence but do not depend on one another. I basically concur. I am an introvert, but "act" the extrovert on a sales call and at work. I take on a totally different, somewhat cocky personality, but it is a false persona I take on to make a living and form business relationships, but it is not "me". And faking it for for years on end has not changed who I am, but it has made me more successful at work and, when I choose, in social situations. I am also sure the "shrink you" has relationships with your partients you do not have in your personal life or ever learned in your youth. Interesting concept and explained in very clear, accessible terms. Another widget for the mental toolbox. Looking forward to the next in the series.
I wish you luck with your quest. Sometimes complex situations and ideas do not lend themselves to simple explanations. While it is satisfying to "turn a phrase", and capture the essence of a concept, the effectiveness of that "phrase" is in what the listener brings to the conversation. I believe the most fundamental aspect of the work of the psychologist, is education. In all learning, work is involved. That work is in understanding better, the complex aspects of personality. As you well know, if the patient is unwilling to do the work, or hasn't the mental agility to comprehend the work, then you are wasting your efforts. I will send you back to Dr. Blatner's diagnostic variables. ( Thank you for sending me to Blatner. I spent months there.)
But back to your quest, it seems to me, given the unique character of templates and experience, that metaphors must be patient specific. Like the "Bees Knees" in the Geico commercial, you have to know the listener. I mean, you can explain transference, or say, "You're doin' the same old stuff". Either way, you as the teacher must evaluate how best to inform and educate. I'm a big fan of yours and looking forward to more. Methinks template and transference are not so synonymous.
Templates, as yall are addressing such, are applications within one unit--first person singular or plural. Transferences involve a person receiving from another an unconscious application of some trait. Yall's template remodeling or redesigning requires a conscious application, best I can tell. |
This is going to be one of those posts that links completely unrelated items. What can I say? I'm female. The concept of "templates" has cropped up in several different context in the Blog Princess's reading of late. I was...
Tracked: May 19, 16:45