Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, March 10. 2010Weds later linksWhite House invents organic Easter eggs. It's about time. Chickens never could figure it out how to produce organic eggs. Sunny-side up or over easy with those recycled wooden government eggs? Detroit Farms? Makes sense to me. Cool Baltic shipwrecks. Would love to see the ancient ones. The NYT as partisan hypocritical hacks, # 3487. h/t, Tiger Dartmouth's Rob Portman looking good in Ohio California's College Dreamers - When will students figure out the politicians have sold them out? Obama Is Late to the Party Does Government Have To Do Everything? Darn good question. Simple answer: No. We The People aren't morons. In fact, we're the Boss. We create the money that they spend. Pathetic: Climategate: George Monbiot despairs of the AGW cause – 'There goes my life's work' . Yes, burned up in global warming. White Trash Barbie. h/t, Vandy Bob Dylan: Jewish Messiah? Sorry. Just one darn good songwriter and song and dance man. Fish photo via theo Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
That cutie better enjoy her fishing while she can. Zero's getting ready to crack down on it. Betcha he's never fished.
Re Detroit farms:
I don't see the sense in it. The mayor wants to forcibly relocate people as he picks winning and losing neighborhoods with the assistance of our tax $$ to boot. Does that sound like the America you want to live in? As for turning the vacant lots to farms, who knows what kind of heavy metals and toxins lie in the soil? Selling produce off those lots sounds like a lawsuit waiting to happen. In addition there will be all the junk in the soil. Old nails, broken glass, pieces of masonry, they are hazards in themselves. If we assume the soil is fine, does a paleface have to worry about personal safety when tilling the soil in Injun country? And what about the harvest being pilfered? OTOH maybe it is the answer and I am nothing more than a dour pessimist? Going back to Santay's comment, the real problem in Michigan would be the cancellation of the Walleye Festival.
Aside from Barry's continual lust for power, how are the liberals planning on controlling recreational fishing even more? Fishermen already have to buy licenses, don't they?
Not being a fisherman myself, I'm not clear on this. But I remember when my parents retired to the Northern Neck of Virginia, bought "12 acres more or less" on the Wicomico River and went fishing any time they darn pleased. That was, of course, back in the 1950s. Marianne First some definitions. There exists a concept called the Exclusive Economic Zone or EEZ which extends out to 200 miles from the mainland. The EEZ is further divided into Inland (bays, estuaries, rivers) that abut the EEZ, Terrritorial waters (to 12 miles), Contigous Zone (an additional 12 miles) and the rest to 200 is EEZ. By practice, states have control over Inland and out to 3 miles of the Territorial waters of the EEZ. The Feds control the rest.
In theory. The concept by which fishing is controlled is called an MPA or Marine Protected Area(s). Basically, the MPA prevents any activity including fishing, in the designated area that is deemed harmful to the creatures that live there. For example, the entire Santa Barbara Channel is off limits to everything except boat passage and during whale migration, even that is limited. I'm not familiar with the entirety of the California MPAs, but they are massive and have recently been expanded. There are several major environmental organizations that are involved in the effort to close off most of the inshore fishing, commercial and recreational the biggest of which is WWF along with Sea Grant, Sierra Club and several other environmental activist groups. During the Bush administration, an initial map of MPAs for the Atlantic region was produced, but it quietly died when it became clear that the intent of the groups pushing was to expand the areas to include areas where potential oil exploration existed. Now what's happened is that an activist EPA along with some sympathetic beauracrats in the NFS and NOAA are pushing the original MPAs that the Bush administration proposed only they are meeting resistance in Congress. Hence, the Executive Order which our President does not seem reluctant to use to further the cause. That's the baseline story - it's a little more complicated than that for various reasons, but that pretty much the jist of the issue. The President will probably use the Executive Order to produce limited MPAs, but as we've seen in CA, the limitations seems to expand over time. Case in point. The SW Ledge off Block Island is currently off limits to striper fishing beyond the Inshore line at 3 miles - there is just a little swath off Block Island Light that is usuable. Some of the most productive fishing areas on the East Coast is essentially off limits to all related fising activity. The problem is that this MPA approach is only a bandaid. We have a totally screwed up quota system commercially and we're allowing too many commercial operations to fish. Additionally, we're mismanaging the resources we have by taking the "traditional" approach (meaning the use of politics) rather than science to setting quotas. I could go on and on, but I'll stop here before my blood pressure rises much more. :>) o/t, but i note from the TV today, playing the fella's 911 call, wherein he couldn't stop his runaway Toyota by following the 911 operator's instruction to 'put the car in neutral and brake' because, as he quavered, he was having to steer at high speed, that he was somehow able to operate his cell phone (and make a recording at 911). He could not shift to neutral, but he could make a phone call.
hmmm...i'd look for the union label, me. I gotta wonder about some of these things. I've had a diesel tractor run away from me (thermal detonation) and that was with a manual transmission - I didn't have a problem disconnecting the clutch and disengaging the tranny. It's even easier on an automatic because there aren't any lockouts - just pop it into neutral.
I also have to wonder about the braking systems. Most of these cars are fairly light w/o a lot of horsepower to speak of - more low end torgue than high end. How hard can it be to stop these things? I don't get it. I don't get it, either, Tom. The one-size-fits-all explanation being given is 'driver panic'. I don't doubt the 'panic' explanation --but as to whether the origin of the panic is the particular auto event, the GM stock in a friend's 401K, or the thirty-nine billion dollars in Toyota's bank account, that to me is an open question.
Heh - "driver panic" - please. Although I suppose that could be a problem - for a maroon.
|
It's been a while since I've done this - apologies! I start off with Brent from Weekend Pundit who has a graph that is right up my alley:Just as Bismark did in Germany in the 1880's did, the Progressives are...
Tracked: Mar 12, 18:07