Maggie's Farm

I am holding my breath to see those "differences". Even Dead Sea Scrolls's (over 2000 years old) only differences are commas and a couple of misspellings.
BD, do you happen to know the specifics?

P.S.:
a couple of observations:
the discoverer of Codex was Friedrich Constantin (von) Tischendorf, a gentleman with a keen interest in New Testament criticism so to speak.

Now in Codex displayed "some familiar -- very important -- passages are missing, including verses dealing with the resurrection of Jesus, they said."

What is the connection? Read his principles of Bible validation. Pay specific attention to point numbers 1 and especially 2.

Basic rule: "The text is only to be sought from ancient evidence, and especially from Greek manuscripts, but without neglecting the testimonies of versions and fathers."

1. "A reading altogether peculiar to one or another ancient document is suspicious; as also is any, even if supported by a class of documents, which seems to evince that it has originated in the revision of a learned man."
2. "Readings, however well supported by evidence, are to be rejected, when it is manifest (or very probable) that they have proceeded from the errors of copyists."
3. "In parallel passages, whether of the New or Old Testament, especially in the Synoptic Gospels, which ancient copyists continually brought into increased accordance, those testimonies are preferable, in which precise accordance of such parallel passages is not found; unless, indeed, there are important reasons to the contrary."
4. "In discrepant readings, that should be preferred which may have given occasion to the rest, or which appears to comprise the elements of the others."
5. "Those readings must be maintained which accord with New Testament Greek, or with the particular style of each individual writer."