Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, March 3. 2007Do Kulaks Love Their Children Too? The stolen Rockwell paintingSteven Spielberg had a stolen Norman Rockwell painting in his collection. What a bizarre story.
The painting was commissioned by Look Magazine in 1967. Spielberg is a longtime collector of Rockwell paintings, and helped to found the Rockwell Museum in Stockbridge, Massachusetts. Good for him. Norman Rockwell was an artist and illustrator of great intuitive insight, famous for painting scenes from everyday life that encapsulate great themes. In 1967, the Soviet Union was still a going concern. Leonid Brezhnev was advancing Marxist insurgencies in Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America. The point of the Soviet bayonet was prodding the United States through a proxy war in Vietnam. Being a closed society, the Soviet Union was able to sow the seeds of confusion about its aims and its depredations on the lives of its own people in the open western press. Norman Rockwell was no fool. Look at the painting. There is a bust of Lenin, with flowers strewn in front of it, a totem to the all-encompassing nature of that regime. All the children's faces, some half in shadow, look dutifully at the front of the room. Here is where Rockwell adds the small thing which informs the whole. Unlike all his classmates, one lone face is turned to look out the window, a window you can sense by the light shining in the room. It is the look of the daydream. The light shines on his face fully, the only one in the class. He is beatified. Rockwell is a subtle genius. Rockwell's information about the Soviet Union was imperfect, same as the rest of us. They lied, and many people here in the west actively helped them in these lies because they saw the Communist system as a viable and benignant alternative to their own societies. But though Rockwell, like the vast majority of people in the west, obviously held no kneejerk terror or hatred of the young people he depicted with such elegance, he wasn't foolish enough not to put the face of hope, the face of his own society, in the middle of that lockstep scene. His moral clarity was intuitive. We have evidence now, we don't need his kind of moral genius to see behind the curtain. One Day In The Life Of Ivan Denisovich doesn't have to be smuggled out of Russia anymore. It's right there on the shelf. It's not 1967 any more. Leonid Brezhnev is not running a closed society. It's not possible not to know that the Soviet Union was one of the greatest crimes against humanity in the history of this planet. Put aside the grinding misery and unnecessary poverty of the most basic human posessions, as well as the rights of the human spirit; just consider the tens of millions -- perhaps hundreds of millions-- of people who died unnatural deaths at the hands of the monster whose bust graces that painting, and those that administered the state apparatus he made possible. He might be the most evil person that ever lived who got their hands on the levers of real power. His evil was of the most durable, institutional kind, and so it transcended the sort of evil that dies with the man that carries it. The library has biographies of Hitler in it. That does not make them cheerleaders for the fellow. The history of the world is filled with very bad people, and must be examined dispassionately. Even an artist like Leni Riefenstahl, who had the talent of a Rockwell, but was bereft of the innate morality that made Rockwell instinctively feel the need to depict in that one shining face a caveat to the picture's general comity, is deserving of praise for her artistry, if not her common sense. I have only one question. Is there any set of circumstances that you could conceive of that would allow you to walk past this painting in your office, day after day, with that monster's head on it, garlanded with flowers? I couldn't. But then, I don't work in Hollywood. There is a fad for things Soviet there. I've seen Triumph of The Will. I didn't watch it for entertainment. Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Roger:
At the rate at which your talent is emerging, I worry that we could lose you to the Boston Herald. I have been to the Rockwell Museum several times. Corny? Corny like Robert Frost is corny. Really good post, Roger. I have one of those Lenin busts, not by choice but by circumstance. About six years ago at a dinner party in a Russian town, the host got a little “exuberant” on vodka, danced like there was no tomorrow, and, in a fit of generosity gifted me with a Lenin bust he had salvaged/purloined from his place of work right after the fall of the Empire. His wife looked horrified, but he insisted I keep it and take it to America to remind us what Russian citizen-moral prisoners had to pretend to pay homage to every day of their oppressed Soviet lives. How on earth did western liberals EVER believe in the validity of communism and a totalitarian USSR, he seemed to be saying, and I had no answer for him.
This Rockwell and your wonderful description of the scene also remind me of something another Russian friend now living in the States mentioned about schooling in Moscow. Said it was common practice for students to cheat on exams and to give away answers to “comrades” just to beat the system. I imagine Alexei gave away more answers than he received, because he’s quite brilliant and the son of a famous physicist. But years later and in the States, the grown-up son still didn’t see anything wrong with cheating. To him, it’s what friends do for one another and a good measure of a person’s willingness to do what it takes, etc. The funny thing was that this conversation came up during a discussion of Clinton’s lying, unethical ways. He liked the guy quite a bit, and so does, apparently, much of the world. And so I wonder about that divergence in underlying personal mores between many (in decreasing numbers) in our culture and many/most people elsewhere who don’t seem to value notions of personal responsibility, honesty, civility and love of liberty as much as they do the idea of “getting along” and being awarded a measure of security through “the system”. Will this difference in values and expectations cause us to wear down as we try to build others up, and is a great leavening and elevation of the mediocre in the future for everybody? Or, will character and political development in other countries progress without them (or us) going Progressive and statist? A oner of a post. What a pleasure. I came at Rockwell's genius from a slightly different angle a couple of years back, blogging about his "The Four Freedoms" series inspired by FDR's rousing wartime State of the Union address in 1941:
"We remember having reproductions of the illustrations hanging on the walls of our grade-school classrooms in the fifties and thinking even then they seemed quaintly old-fashioned. In today's world, again at war with those who would stomp on our freedoms, we see them with fresh eyes. Because Rockwell's subject matter was usually on the corny side, serious art critics tended to look down upon the artist's accomplishment, but beyond the anecdotal component -- much loved by the average American -- his compositional and painterly skills were quite remarkable." http://sisu.typepad.com/sisu/2005/11/it_does_not_tak.html Nice post but the snippy note that Hollywood loves Commies nd then some commercail nonsense is misleading an d, franklyk, juvenile
My son and his friend, visiting from college, went to NY and bought tee shirts with hammer and sickel Why? Because their track coach is from Russia and they want to twit him. LKids do odd things--lord love them--and they think it is cute or clever or hip; but to buy a shirt found in L.A. and claim somehow that this represent Hollywood would not sit well with, say, Clint Eastwood. No juveniles here. All superannuated adolescents.
Yes, kids do dumb stuff. However, with rare exceptions, Hollywood has an airheaded radical-chic political fashion which is hard to miss, I think. I wouldn't even mind different views, if there were brains and information behind it, but there's about as much brain as in a $900. Gucci pocketbook. Mostly, mind you. |
Steven Spielberg had a stolen Norman Rockwell painting in his collection. "Spielberg purchased the painting in 1989 from a legitimate dealer and didn't know it was stolen until his staff spotted its image last week on an FBI Web...
Tracked: Mar 04, 09:30