I read the three-part series in the WSJ by Murray, which was interesting and provocative. Had been meaning to write something on the series, but Kling beat me to it at TCS.
Kling links the WSJ articles. I cannot link them thru the subscription barrier.
Kling believes that Murray is too IQ-centric and elitist, (our piece on IQ here) and is skeptical about the idea of "talent." I lean towards Murray's view, even though I usually agree with Kling on things in general. Furthermore, I think Kling misunderestimates the economic ladder that the trades climb: any plumber in my town makes more money than the average college grad in their cubicle - and has more fun and more freedom in doing so.
I will agree with Kling on one thing: the nature and goals of high school education need to be re-thought - but not re-thought by government. And college? Most American college education is overpriced high-school remediation, with a dose of Marxist re-education thrown in.