Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Friday, October 12. 2018Back In the Saddle Again
Guten Morgen to all you farmers, and all the ships at sea. It's me, Roger de Hauteville. Bird Dog is having his teeth sharpened at the veterinarian/day spa. So you're stuck with me. Say, do you speak German? Guten Morgen is German. Like most greetings, it says, "good morning," but really means, "Screw you, get away from the coffee pot, I've got spreadsheets to lie to." What I find fascinating about guten Morgen, and similar greetings, is that they appear to be accusations, more or less. Now, I've declined very few German verbs, and no invitations to cocktail lounges, but just saying good morning should be guter Morgen if you're just assembling words out of the dictionary. Guten Morgen is correct, however, because it's in the accusative case. Guten Morgen is really just a truncation of a really long sentence in German (is there another kind?) that directs you to have a nice day. Like howdy, or hiya, or howyadoin, or hallo fellow well met, it's an abbreviated, handy way to express a longer thought in a short burst of syllables. It appears to my not very well-educated eye that all greetings are in the accusative case. So, from now on, to flesh out my greetings with the appropriate sentiment, and stay within the spirit of the accusative, I'll say, "Have a nice day, or else." On to the links! Facebook purged over 800 U.S. accounts and pages for pushing political spam
I'm sure this was accomplished in their usual, even-handed, transparent, and non=partisan way. Interstellar Visitor Found to Be Unlike a Comet or an Asteroid
They named it ’Oumuamua? The name starts with an apostrophe? Okey Dokey then. Let's pray that there's intelligent life somewhere out in space, 'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth. The Biggest Buyers of American Stocks Are on the Sidelines Right Now
So, according to the Times, companies have been buying gobs of their own stock, which is bad, but they stopped for fifteen minutes to fill out some paperwork, which is also bad. I blame Trump, which I believe is conclusion I'm supposed to draw if I read anything in the Times. Leonardo da Vinci's tree rule may be explained by wind
I'm not buying it until I hear from Bob Ross. He can paint trees a lot faster than da Vinci, so he must know more about it. Tesla says orders placed by Oct 15 eligible for full tax credit
There are welfare queens, and then there's this guy. The last lighthouse keeper of Capri
The Italian government still pays a guy to flip a switch twice a day? Good work when you can get it. Of course Amazon Echo users shell out scads of their own cash, and surrender all their privacy, just so they can shut off the lights in the room they're in without flipping a switch. You decide which is crazier. Plastic surgeon buys top South Korea Bitcoin exchange
I still keep all my money in greenbacks. They're real, and they're spectacular. Astronauts escape malfunctioning Soyuz rocket
First, picture in your mind flying in a spaceship built by the lowest bidder. Now picture flying in a spaceship built by the lowest bidder in Vladivostok. Hipness a Priority for Amazon in HQ2 Meeting With Toronto Mayor
I'm trying to conjure up a name for someone less hip than Jeff Bezos, but I'm drawing a blank.
I blame Sesame Street. No, really. The minute children learned that the alphabet was supposed to get up and dance before you paid attention to it, every succeeding generation was doomed. Me, I prefer to snarl, "Good morning" to everyone at work and then scratch in my ledgers to fleece the customers and lord it over the employees. Jeez, kids these days. Guten Morgen, Maggie's Farm readers, or else!
Posted by Roger de Hauteville
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects
at
06:42
| Comments (58)
| Trackback (1)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
RE: ’Oumuamua
It is the fashion for astronomers at the Mauna Loa observatory to assign common names of objects discovered there in the Native Hawaiian language. The current Historical-linguistic theory is that when the Hawaiian Islands were settled by the Polynesians, the canoe carrying their consonants was lost at sea. Your gonna be waitin' a long time to hear from Bob Ross since it died over twenty years ago.
Is it too arch to point out that American Astronauts do not have to bail out of American launch vehicles, because we don't have any?
Yes.
Say what you want about the Soyuz capsule but it's a proven, successful design from the Sixties that still works like a Trojan. JJM: Say what you want about the Soyuz capsule but it's a proven, successful design from the Sixties that still works like a Trojan.
Quite. While the U.S. Space Shuttle had no mechanism for jettisoning the crew during an aborted launch, the Soyuz brought the astronauts home. Lower cost. Safer. More adaptable. Yep. The memories of when they planted their commie flag on the moon are as clear as the last day of never.
😂😂😂 But, honestly, what good is a commie flag on the moon when the very foundations of the Supreme Court have been eroded by the appointment of a man who didn't do what a bunch of wannabe-commies alleged he did?!?
#2.1.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-12 16:48
(Reply)
This:
QUOTE: What good is ______________ when the very foundations of the Supreme Court have been eroded by the appointment of a man who didn't do what a bunch of ___________ alleged he did?!? should become a meme. For example, imagine Rush Limbaugh going over th recent job numbers: "What good is the lowest unemployment rate in years when the very foundations of the Supreme Court have been eroded by the appointment of a man who didn't do what a cabal of shrill feminist activists and their sleazy lawyers alleged he did?" Or Tucker Carlson: "What good is the favorable renegotiation of NAFTA when the very foundations of the Supreme Court have been eroded by the appointment of a man who didn't do what a legion of aging white elitists alleged he did?" Or Nikki Haley, in a soon-to-be-aired interview: "Why did I leave? I mean why NOT? What good is the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and the end of a war that's older than almost 90% of Americans when the very foundations of the Supreme Court have been eroded by the appointment of a man who didn't do what the usual liberal apologists-for-communism and their enablers in the main stream media alleged he did?" I don't think that would ever get old.
#2.1.1.1.1.1
Thos.
on
2018-10-12 20:32
(Reply)
Thanks, Thos. (and Yet the Gasbot below), but I was only parroting leftists in writing that. There's an underlying reality that your hypothetical examples acknowledge: There's no geopolitical accomplishment that leftists won't attempt to diminish - typically via bad faith conflation with essentially unrelated events - in support of achieving their political goals. A non-leftist could cure cancer and in seconds leftists would find someone wronged (or made "unsafe") by this and - naturally - call for more leftism as the remedy. It gets tiresome, but more and more folks are on to the scam.
And I understand that "politics ain't bean-bag", that folks all along the political spectrum are going to fight their corner, but the Left has no boundaries. Well, save for those thankfully set by the 2nd Amendment!
#2.1.1.1.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-13 04:48
(Reply)
An excellent point, Bill. Quite outstanding.
What's more, on the rare occasion the esteemed left finds itself temporarily out of power, it wisely uses that period to brush up on its classical terminology. Constitutional, democratic, principles, and values being a few of the vaunted ethics it plumbs from back in the lockbox of foundational American structuralism. I come away renewed and relieved that the modern Democrat would never stoop to Marxism. rampant disorder, racial and sexual division, pathological dishonesty, and outright institutional criminality to further him or herself.
#2.1.1.1.1.2
Yet the Gasbot abides.
on
2018-10-13 03:09
(Reply)
I'm with you, Yet - I get downright misty-eyed with joy and relief watching out-of-power Democrats cling - bitterly - to the Constitution and the rule of law ...
A Democrat when Democrats are in control: Say, that Caligula chap wasn't all bad, and we just might learn a thing or three about running our country from him! A Democrat when Democrats are on the outs: In order to devote more time to converting the second floor of my home into a Betsy Ross shrine, I've decided to back-burner my efforts to ensure that transgender ex-cons get the elementary school girls' restroom access they - and society - so desperately need.
#2.1.1.1.1.2.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-13 05:09
(Reply)
P.S. Waiting with bated breath for the joint Venezuelan-Cuban space program! It's gonna be lit!
#2.1.1.1.2
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-12 16:53
(Reply)
No one here was suggesting any slight on the moon shot.
But the Soyuz - albeit with rather more advanced technology fitted now - has outlived all US manned spacecraft with over (I think) 140 missions. As far as commie flags on the moon go, unless phoney-commie China plants one, it ain't gonna happen. Indeed, that's something else Soyuz has outlived: communism.
#2.1.1.1.3
JJM
on
2018-10-12 17:31
(Reply)
Didn't take what you wrote as a ding on the moon shoot - just being flippant on a Friday afternoon.
Success and longevity of the Soyuz speaks for themselves. China's "phoney communism" a real worry - totalitarianism fueled by almost-capitalism. QUOTE: Indeed, that's something else Soyuz has outlived: communism. A good thing to outlive!
#2.1.1.1.3.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-12 18:40
(Reply)
"A good thing to outlive!"
With you on that! Modern China strikes me as a corporate state i.e., as if everybody were an employee of the same corporation and had to toe the company line in all matters - or else. Gee, at the state level, if that's akin to anything, I'd say it's like fascism.
#2.1.1.1.3.1.1
JJM
on
2018-10-12 19:50
(Reply)
QUOTE: Gee, at the state level, if that's akin to anything, I'd say it's like fascism. Bingo! I was going to say something similar, but didn't out of fear of yet another tedious, missing the point Gasbot attempt to draw meaningless distinctions between socialism/communism and fascism, which are - most importantly - totalitarian peer competitors (Coke vs. Pepsi, essentially, but with more killing and human suffering). Hence communists and fascists being at each other's throats since almost the git-go.
#2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-13 05:45
(Reply)
The only comfort I take from totalitarian states that flirt with capitalism to fund their schemes is that capitalism doesn't work at anything like its full capacity unless there's freedom. So free capitalist states kick the butt of totalitarian ones in the end every time, just not quite as fast as they kick the butt of outright socialist ones.
#2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1.1
Texan99
on
2018-10-13 09:10
(Reply)
Agreed - freedom-based capitalism will win out in the long run.
#2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-13 11:03
(Reply)
JJM: Modern China strikes me as a corporate state i.e., as if everybody were an employee of the same corporation and had to toe the company line in all matters - or else.
While more complex than that, the analogy is not without merit. In the case of China, the corporation is so big that it is very unwieldy. The government is attempting to spinoff some aspects of the market economy to the local level; but once this process starts, the centrifugal forces may tear it all apart. Texan99: The only comfort I take from totalitarian states that flirt with capitalism to fund their schemes is that capitalism doesn't work at anything like its full capacity unless there's freedom. Many totalitarian regimes have had capitalist economies, but not necessarily free market economies. Still, open societies have historically been more economically vibrant. (That ignores the problem of how open societies are currently being reverse engineered by authoritarians intent on creating political instability.)
#2.1.1.1.3.1.1.2
Zachriel
on
2018-10-13 10:29
(Reply)
"Centrifugal forces" says the gasbot as a euphemism for absolutely nothing at all and whose ponderous thoughts have never once turned to the organic problem of the few and their authority taking some degree of it out on their subjects, the many, in all its complexity.
In the American sense it was to constitute a national defense, be divided, and arise of the people, but that's failed, while elsewhere there was never even that motive. Elsewhere it's just a junta or cabal directing a military and a monetary system. So Gasbot arrives at "centrifugal forces" meant, presumably, to imply that once unhinged from a vestigial but very totalitarian force locals simply cannot function. Why they'll spin apart. Probably strike the walls and leave marks. Possibly render themselves unconscious, depending on the velocity of this flying apart. Might strike innocents. Head-first, feet-first, belly-flopping. And then Someone will have to come and throw a switch and bring everything back to what it's Supposed To Be. And you thought robotic leftism wasn't logical and didn't have a precise grasp on human nature. Why, not only that, just look at its rhetoric. Centrifugal forces, presumably of a universal kind. From which the Gasbot resumes its lecture on the very basics of organized societies, as if none in attendance had a whit of a clue.
#2.1.1.1.3.1.1.2.1
Yet the gasbot abides.
on
2018-10-13 11:17
(Reply)
Quite. There's absolutely nothing the Gasbot isn't a renown expert on. Makes you stop and ask yourself, hey, just who employs the Gasbot?
#2.1.1.1.4
Yet the Gasbot abides.
on
2018-10-13 02:57
(Reply)
QUOTE: Quite. There's ... That "Quite" was good for quite a belly laugh! Yes, the Gasbot knows all. But, damn, are its feet made of clay. Especially in regard to logic. Exhibit A (from the comments section for this post): Zachriel: QUOTE: In a democracy, the acceptance of court decisions by the people is essential. If a judge is seen as a partisan rather than an impartial judge of facts and law, it undermines the courts. The Gasbot abides: QUOTE: I see the three women on the court - all leftists - as so untrustworthy that I refuse to accept them as justices. In fact, the very fashion of their respective demeanors nullifies their opinions. I mean, jeez, to leave one's logical flank exposed like that ... Hell, a moderately bright 5th-grader wouldn't make that mistake, wouldn't lob a meatball over the plate like Zachriel did there.
#2.1.1.1.4.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-13 06:04
(Reply)
Yup, Bill. And our Gasbot expects this risible gaslighting to stand, as if structuralism ain't a thing and instead - wait for it - the constitution was originally written as to its intent and penumbras and Living aspects and whatnot, retroactively, by current precedent overriding original textualism.
Sort that out: It was intentionally written to say nothing until magically one day it did. Whatever that thing may be. It's quite a trick, but no less a trick than blah blah blah the Courts blah blah blah the Peoples' trust blah blah blah clawing at the courtroom doors and so on. Advise and consent blah blah blah two hundreds years procedure blah blah blah. You got it. The Court is defined by the mob although let's use us some nice post hoc constitutionalese bullshit sprinkled with revisionist postmodern rhetoric to make us sound all acceptable. Gaslighting. It's the gaseous form of a political ideology - so it can seep under doors and weblogs - whose primary unit is force, whose prime mover is secular power, whose ethic is the lie, whose aim is to take and deconstruct, and whose religion is Progressivism.
#2.1.1.1.4.1.1
Yet the Gasbot abides.
on
2018-10-13 07:58
(Reply)
QUOTE: It was intentionally written to say nothing until magically one day it did. Whatever that thing may be. Yes, indeed - rules that are worthless/antiquated/infinitely vague when standing in the way of leftists' goals magically crystallize in unconditional, self-evident support of whatever they happen to deem politically expedient at the moment. QUOTE: It's quite a trick, but no less a trick than blah blah blah the Courts blah blah blah the Peoples' trust blah blah blah clawing at the courtroom doors and so on. Advise and consent blah blah blah two hundreds years procedure blah blah blah. Throw in an additional pinch of "We The People", "unanimity", etc. (see Gasbot below) and let her simmer. The Gasbot's arguments remind me of an old Captain Kirk era Star Trek episode, the one in which aliens have to surgically reconstruct a severely injured human despite never having seen one before - the human patient survives but is a mess because they have been put back together all wrong. And so it is with a Gasbot argument: Yes, it properly includes the analog to a hand, but unfortunately that hand protrudes from the left temple. Other anatomical analogies suggest themselves.
#2.1.1.1.4.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-13 11:17
(Reply)
Bill Carson: Throw in an additional pinch of "We The People", "unanimity"
The Declaration of Independence claims that "the People" have the right to alter or to abolish government when it fails to protect their fundamental liberties. Do you think "the People" means unanimity?
#2.1.1.1.4.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-10-13 12:09
(Reply)
Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton without unanimity, so we agree!
#2.1.1.1.4.1.1.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-13 14:51
(Reply)
Bill Carson: Exhibit A
There is no inconsistency there, that is, unless you think that consent of the people means unanimity. If that is the case, then this is a meaningless document: "We the People", as would be this document: "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government"
#2.1.1.1.4.1.2
Zachriel
on
2018-10-13 10:37
(Reply)
QUOTE: Gaslighting. It's the gaseous form of a political ideology - so it can seep under doors and weblogs - whose primary unit is force, whose prime mover is secular power, whose ethic is the lie, whose aim is to take and deconstruct, and whose religion is Progressivism.
#2.1.1.1.4.1.2.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-13 11:00
(Reply)
Holy shit, Bill, now the thing's linking original US documents. Did you even know those existed?!
What enlightenment. What prevarication. What mendacity. I hadn't even read that pail of bollocks when I wrote about Gasbot above whose ponderous thoughts have never once turned to the organic problem of the few and their authority taking some degree of it out on their subjects, the many, in all its complexity. Us normals realize that the problem of authority is as to type and quantity. The right is passive, moronically so much of its existence. The left is active; parasitic, envious, covetous, thieving, and to hide it, dishonest. Gaslighters. The Framers, realizing the nature of man and his governments, simply instituted enumerated powers, national defense, the various negative rights, the divided powers and several States. The point was obvious. To prevent force. To protect from force (a kernel philosophy the right has been merely ostensible if not entirely silent about for decades, even centuries). And into this raging opportunity naturally steps the malignant, devious, and conniving, who then establish various Parties and eventually, whole ways and means to legitimize their crimes and grafts. Except the fundamental aspect still exists; it exists because even where it's absent or ruined it can never be philosophically inviolable: Though shalt take no force against any man except by extremely limited means as enumerated here. How is the left going to get around this? Make forced civil "equality" a thing, leave the definition open, get the infernal thing on the Court, and have a ball. Now the original anti-force mandate becomes the anti-prejudice national mandate where both words become variable and that means someone's gonna have to arbitrate. Distribute the spoils. Reconstruct the history. Revise the meanings and definitions. Reform those who disagree. And call it all some flowery stuff to conceal it. Slide it right past them. Force that's somehow not force, which in order to exist as such takes a lot of, you guessed it, gaslighting. It's not really that thing, why it's this thing over here. Which is another kind of force, force used by X against Y, either to deceive Y, or if that doesn't work, to join forces to make it happen anyway. Because purity. Democracy. Surely one day they'll see it was all for their own good, all this gaslighting and force and redistribution and deconstruction and revisionism. Isn't good always comprised of bad ingredients?
#2.1.1.1.4.1.2.1.1
Yet the Gasbot abides.
on
2018-10-13 11:43
(Reply)
QUOTE: Holy shit, Bill, now the thing's linking original US documents. Did you even know those existed?! What enlightenment. What prevarication. What mendacity. Mendacity that's damn near inconceivable. QUOTE: whose ponderous thoughts have never once turned to the organic problem of the few and their authority taking some degree of it out on their subjects, the many, in all its complexity. Us normals realize that the problem of authority is as to type and quantity ... "Ponderous thoughts" being the cumbersome (forced) introduction of physics - even as a metaphor - into the issue of the rights of the individual and the associated one of government by consent of the individual. Barring control of it by those who know better than those they are supposed to represent and serve (and who, for good measure, despise them), society is little more than a jello dessert on spinning turntable. Got it. QUOTE: The Framers, realizing the nature of man and his governments, simply instituted enumerated powers, national defense, the various negative rights, the divided powers and several States. The point was obvious. To prevent force. To protect from force (a kernel philosophy the right has been merely ostensible if not entirely silent about for decades, even centuries). Can't be put better or more clearly than you do here: the rights of the individual - the "atom" (or building block) of society (on any scale) if we want to stay in the physics realm - are defined by the freedom of the individual, and freedom is, by definition, defined by the limits on force. QUOTE: How is the left going to get around this? Make forced civil "equality" a thing, leave the definition open, get the infernal thing on the Court, and have a ball. Now the original anti-force mandate becomes the anti-prejudice national mandate where both words become variable and that means someone's gonna have to arbitrate. Distribute the spoils. Reconstruct the history. Revise the meanings and definitions. Reform those who disagree. And call it all some flowery stuff to conceal it. Slide it right past them. Force that's somehow not force, which in order to exist as such takes a lot of, you guessed it, gaslighting. It's not really that thing, why it's this thing over here. Which is another kind of force, force used by X against Y, either to deceive Y, or if that doesn't work, to join forces to make it happen anyway. Because purity. Democracy. Again, you nailed it. The speech of non-leftists has been redefined as violence; the violence of leftists has been redefined as speech. "We the People" must at all costs stop the "violence" and allow the "speech". And then to the spoils. Mendacity doesn't begin to describe it.
#2.1.1.1.4.1.2.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-14 03:49
(Reply)
Bill Carson: Mendacity that's damn near inconceivable.
Well, we wouldn't ascribe mendacity to your latest diversion, but it was certainly incorrect. In your "Exhibit A" comment, You made the claim that two of our previous statements were in contradiction. But that claim hinged on a conflation of the phrase "the People". We provided two citations we hoped you would agree with; the U.S. Declaration of Independence, which argues that "the Right of the People to alter or to abolish" oppressive governments; and the U.S. Constitution, which claims to be founded by "We the People of the United States". Instead, you diverted from your diversions, and ignored the argument.
#2.1.1.1.4.1.2.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2018-10-14 08:52
(Reply)
The Gasbot shall define your allowable discussion, Bill. Make no forays elsewhere because that would be diversionary and outside the argument.
This is not force.
#2.1.1.1.4.1.2.1.1.1.1.1
Yet the Gasbot abides.
on
2018-10-14 09:32
(Reply)
Funny, Yet, but the "We the People"/"other voices must be heard" crowd only seem to want to hear the voices of certain people in regard to certain topics. Must be that damn centrifugal force these learned types keep chirping on about! Speaking of centrifugal force, it seems to be pushing me towards non-artisanal beer and mindless Sunday entertainment. Have a good one!
P.S. And We the People's Gaslight/Missing the Forest for the Trees bot keeps incorrectly chirping that I pointed out a - heavy tympani! - contradiction in its latest Yankee Doodle Dandy - seasoned inanity salad, when I merely pointed out the logical hole in its "argument" that you promptly drove a truck through. More of that and Zachriel's gonna have to surrender their "Fraternal Order of the Constitutionally Aligned Gaslighters Local 1776" membership card!
#2.1.1.1.4.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-14 10:42
(Reply)
Of all of the epsilon away from non-existent things I've ignored in my lifetime, the "argument" of which you speak was the absolute easiest for me to ignore.
#2.1.1.1.4.1.2.1.1.1.1.2
Bill Carson
on
2018-10-14 10:46
(Reply)
"The tax credit is then reduced by 50 percent every six months until it phases out."
I have it on good authority that it never will phase out, then. And a bloody good morgen hurled up your alley as well. Maxine Waters may be a real moron or she may be pandering to her moronic constituents. Either way since you and I don't vote in her elections she doesn't care a bit what we think. She lives in a big house and unlike most of her poor voters, is living large. The more she is criticized by others the more her voters love her.
California's 43rd congressional district was specifically gerrymandered to insure that a chimp or sheboon like Maxine gets elected. Just as Texas's 18th congressional district was gerrymandered to insure a chimp or sheboon like Sheila Jackson Lee gets elected. Just as Florida’s 5th congressional district wsa gerrymandered for Corinne Brown. Just as Florida’s 10th congressional district was gerrymandered for Val Demings. The same holds true for EVERY district represented by the Congressional Black Caucus: https://cbc.house.gov/
"Law Enforcement" and the "Legal" system have NO problem with gerrymandering, as long as it makes sure the RIGHT people get "elected". At least Corrine is in the congressional summer camp for now.
Since Mark is clearly truant from middle school, I think someone should notify the authorities about him.
Go right ahead. After all, that is the very cuck assumption to make, and the cuck thing to do. Blow it out your Jonah.
That is racial politics. The race in question doesn't like you and when Maxine sticks her finger in your eye they like that. It is no different from gender politics. A lot of the women on the left don't like you. They may not like you because you are male or it may be as simple as your belief in god or your belief that babies shouldn't be killed. Ditto for the LGBQT... they don't like you because either you are not LGBQT or simply because you won't bow to their beliefs.
If this subject comes up on CNN or any left wing venue it will be parsed and focused such that YOU are racist, misogynist or homophobic. It will always be your fault when in fact it is as simple as "They don't like you". > I still keep all my money in greenbacks
No, you keep most of your money in the bank or in stocks and bonds. It's just denominated in US currency. re: Hipness a priority for Amazon in talks with Toronto Mayor.
"I'm trying to conjure up a name for someone less hip than Jeff Bezos, but I'm drawing a blank." Obviously, you've never met Toronto Mayor John Tory, who is about as unhip as it is humanly possible to be. Next to him, Jeff Bezos looks like a man-bunned, tat-sleeved hipster at Burning Man. Re: Facebook kicking out political spam sites - are regular spam sites still good? Spam is spam, why are they so touchy simply on the sub-category of political spam? Maybe worried about their close - some might suggest incestuous - relationship with government the way most back scratchers, log rollers and palm greasers are? Politics may be a dirty business but a lot of the dirt seems to be filthy lucre.
It's only "right-wing" spam that they hate. The LOVE left-wing spam.
re: your intro today...
"Now, I've declined very few German verbs, and no invitations to cocktail lounges..." Best grammar geek joke I've ever heard :-) When you're drinking from the top shelf, keep it neat. Here I was thinking, No, No! it's conjugate a verb, decline a noun or adjective, but sources on the internet explain that "decline a verb" actually is correct. I learn something new every day around here.
"It appears to my not very well-educated eye that all greetings are in the accusative case."
All greetings using masculine words (Abend, Tag, Morgen) are because the masculine singular is the only place the accusative case manifests itself in German. The accusative is used because it is implied that you are wishing someone something. So Guten Morgen, Guten Tag and Guten Abend. But Gute Nacht whether Nacht is the subject or object because the word Nacht is feminine. Well, good enough for the Prussians up north, but further south, a simple “Grüß Gott!” works any time of day.
"I still keep all my money in greenbacks. They're real, and they're spectacular."
Just saw re-run of that episode LAST NIGHT!! LOL "Facebook purged over 800 U.S. accounts and pages for pushing political spam"
-------------------------------------------------------- An article by one of the victims of the purge: https://rwnofficial.com/right-wing-news-responds-to-facebook-purge/ I think some of these folks are thinking about bringing breach of contract / unfair business practice suits against Facebook, since they had developed programs in cooperation with Facebook to bring in new advertisers and invested their own capital to do so. QUOTE: They named it ’Oumuamua? The name starts with an apostrophe? Okey Dokey then. Let's pray that there's intelligent life somewhere out in space, 'Cause there's bugger all down here on Earth. It's not an apostrophe. It's an 'okina, referred to in English as a "glottal stop." An 'okina is considered a consonant in the Hawaiian language. It always proceeds a vowel. It is essentially a break in the flow of air as you are speaking. It is like a cockney speaking, instead of saying "a bottle of beer," a cockney would say "a bott'ul of beer." If it is at the beginning of a word, an 'okina also affects the pronunciation of the proceeding word. Hawaiian tends to turn adjacent vowels of adjacent words into diphthongs, blending the vowel sounds. If you have an 'okina, however, you will maintain the distinct vowel sounds of the end of the proceeding word and the beginning of the succeeding word. (Hawaiian words always end in a vowel or vowel combination.) Whether or not you have an 'okina at the beginning of a noun will also change a definite article directly before it. A noun beginning with a vowel without an 'okina takes the definite article ke. A noun beginning with a vowel with an 'okina takes the definite article "ka." Thus, "ke ao" ("the world"); "ka 'aina" ("the land"). Pau (Finished) "It's not an apostrophe. It's an 'okina, referred to in English as a 'glottal stop.'"
It's an okina in written Hawaiian. In written English, it has no significance at all; it's there only as a courtesy to the original language, like the accent in fiancée. Sometimes, if I'm feeling mischievous when someone tells me to have a good day, I reply " Thank you. But I've already made other plans."
|
Tracked: Oct 14, 09:49