Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Tuesday, October 11. 2011People Who Make Things BetterThere have been plenty of tributes to Steve Jobs' life. The man was a visionary and radically altered the world of computing several times. He also completely changed the world of animation. What many people miss, however, is that he was not only a great inventor and leader, but an inspirational force that could help pull us out of the current mess we are in. Rather than whining and crying and asking for more from others, Jobs set a standard which all of us should follow.
Posted by Bulldog
in The Culture, "Culture," Pop Culture and Recreation
at
19:52
| Comments (27)
| Trackback (1)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
And yet Apple has no manufacturing facilities in the US. All products are made in China, Cambodia or Vietnam by three major companies - Foxconn, Inventec and JCY. All three have been investigated for slave labor conditions and pay in addition to human trafficking.
Just sayin'. I'm less concerned about outsourcing. Certainly the poor conditions and treatment of workers are a concern. But the high paying, high value jobs which Apple and Pixar created were in the US. Not to mention the incredible value Jobs added to US productivity on many different levels.
Focusing on the downside is shortsighted. Every great story has a downside. Edison stole ideas, shortchanged the innovators in his shop, invested poorly and in stupid businesses, and was generally an asshole. But since he was so successful in other areas, he had money to spare and people put up with him and his idiosyncracies. There are very few great creators and innovators who you can say only nice things about. At this stage, I'll take Jobs for many reasons, but for one in particular: He would probably look at the 99%ers and tell them to get off their asses and get to work thinking of new ideas, new products, and new ways of doing things. So as long as slave labor and conditions are "outsourced" that's a positive thing as you have your iPod and AirMac and iPad high tech electronics - that poor 12 year old putting component boards into the solder wave machine breathing lead fumes and handling hot FR4 composite boards without gloves isn't relevant to the discussion. That is all kind of invisible to you as you listen to Elton John sing "Rocket Man" on your iTouch.
Good to know that your labor sins in other countries can be absolved because you do "good things" here in the US. Now, you know full well that isn't what I was saying. But if that's how you choose to view it, fine.
We're all just as concerned about human rights abroad as we are here. What's interesting is, at least I'm honest about one thing - I'm not going to boycott products just because I have a gripe with the company. If so, then I'd be boycotting everything. But the OWS movement utilizes all these technologies, and is calling for boycotts of companies that engage these policies. So, I'm not a hypocrite like they are. In my opinion, the best way to improve things is to engage the process, not boycott or push it aside. Should I feel bad about being an American because of all the Indians that were killed to create our nation? No. So I'm not going to feel bad about listening to my iPod. There are limits to what we are capable of changing. If we shut down Apple, there is no doubt things in those countries will be less likely to improve. With Apple there, awareness is raised. Now, you know full well that isn't what I was saying. But if that's how you choose to view it, fine.
I will grant you that I'm not the smartest guy on the face of the planet, sharpest knife in the drawer, brightest bulb in the box, my spelling, grammar and punctuation are atrocious (as BD can attest) and I do have problems comprehending the written word (but I have an excuse for that - I'm a poor reader due to lack of intervention early on for my dyslexia) but exactly how was I to interpret: QUOTE: I'm less concerned about outsourcing. Certainly the poor conditions and treatment of workers are a concern. But the high paying, high value jobs which Apple and Pixar created were in the US. Not to mention the incredible value Jobs added to US productivity on many different levels. I'm less concerned about outsourcing Back in the day after I left Texaco and moved back to New England, I was hired to develop quality standards for Data General - who at that time was one of the hot up and comers in the mini-computer marketplace. Their entire manufacturing operation was located in Southboro, MA and a large portion of their hands-on labor were Portuguese immigrants from the Marlboro/Clinton/Leominster, Framingham communities. As DG grew, they added a plant in Portsmouth, NH and eventually began moving their manufacturing operations there due to the extreme increases in taxation from the Massachusetts legislature. Our hands on laborers lost their jobs to cheaper labor in NH. It was kind of a mini-outsourcing if you will, but to another state. Those low level manufacturing employees were out of a good paying job with little to no prospects of getting a new one as it just about the time when the entire mini industry was contracting - even DEC was having problems and moved a large part of their operation to NH to reduce costs. So I've seen it first hand and it isn't pretty. Certainly the poor conditions and treatment of workers are a concern. Let me try to understand this - as I said I ain't quite right in the head. Let's accept for the moment that we're all "concerned" about poor conditions and bad worker treatment. Let's also stipulate that, as you said, the products are pure genius, increased productivity and created high paying jobs in the US. At what point does the "concern" about poor to atrocious treatment of labor equal the value of the product to society? In other words, is it worth ignoring our own principles of freedom, fair play and individuality not to mention the right to assembly as seen in the formation of Unions to protect workers rights just so we can listen to death metal while jogging? Or sitting on our comfortable couches reading the news on our iPads? High paying jobs are all well and good. My understanding though is that a lot of these high paying jobs are H1B visa employees because Apple (and other high tech organizations) can't find qualified US citizens to fill those jobs. So in a sense, we're also outsourcing our intellectual efforts to citizens of other countries. It's not like H1B visas are immigrants either - the employer has to specifically apply for an H1B visa for any particular foreign employee. I agree that there are limits to what can be changed. I also agree that not using a particular product because of poor labor conditions isn't practical. I will stipulate that we cannot spite our nose right off of our faces (I love that line from "In Spite of Ourselves"). But (yeah, I know - poor form using but) the concept of Jobs being an "angel" and a High Priest of social responsibility belies the darker underbelly of his company. I would be willing to bet money that you don't even think about the issue of human trafficking or slave labor when you bought your iPod or iTouch. I have a conceit that I'm at least aware of the problems and I do think about it when I'm considering purchasing something. I do not own an Apple product and I won't use Apple products. That is my personal decision. I do try and purchase products where I can be reasonably certain that the labor involved in producing the products I buy are built by employees who are at least earning a local living wage. I know that is almost impossible, but I do try and research the companies and their manufacturing. Last, Apple is a highly profitable company - something on the order of 50% profit margin on average across their product line. They clear as much profit as they spend to make the profit including taxes. That is a successful company. Can you honestly say that they cannot build a product or two in the US? Side Note: I have a very good friend, went to school with me, we worked at Texaco together - our careers were very similar, almost parallel in fact. He worked for Apple as a product designer/engineer when Jobs was brought back into the company. He told me, and I believe him because he does not have the type of personality that exaggerates or embellishes anything, that working at the Cupertino Campus was like working in a prison. Jobs would stalk the hallways always with a scowl on his face, pop into offices and cubicles without warning and if he saw something he didn't like, you were sure to hear about it from him personally - and that wasn't a pleasant experience. He also had a mouth that wasn't very civil. So take it for what that's worth. As I said, you can find nasty stories about everyone. I've heard bad stories about Jobs, too. But the overall benefits his work provided for people, in general? I'll take them over the all the nasty personal stuff.
As for the outsourcing stories, I've got plenty of my own, thanks. My sister works at Verizon and I could tell you amazing stories about the outsourcing. Still, it's of little interest to me. Companies move, companies close, companies change. The US is littered with towns that were built on a premise that eventually ended. Is it ugly? Sure. Is it fair? I forget what part of life was promised to me as "fair", but when I remember I'll get back to you. Is it ugly? It's never pretty. I've lived it. My last company went bankrupt. I lost my job, was out of work for 8 months. Why? Because the business they were in was done far more cheaply in Canada and Korea, and the owner preferred to pocket his $900,000 salary with his other buddies in the executive suite, and pay the salaries locally. It was a great gesture, on his part, and certainly he deserves some kind of medal for his patriotic behavior. In the end, he lost 1,000 people their jobs. Had he outsourced more, he'd have saved about 500-700, and might have kept his company intact. There are always more than one way to look at things, Tom. I don't like seeing jobs leave the US, but in the long run, as Ricardo and Bastiat point out, we're better off. The problem is, as Keynes said, in the long run we're all dead. So you have to pick your poison. I believe if we had more people like Jobs who took an entrepreneurial and innovative approach to things, our economic mess would clean itself up quickly. On that note, I'll add this final point - when I was unemployed, I spent time trying to figure out what I would do. I was reaching the breaking point, financially. I got very lucky, found some consulting work and that may spin off into a full time job soon. But when I was looking for work, I spent time speaking with other unemployed people in my neighborhood (there are many), asking what their views were. None were particularly optimistic (I try to remain optimistic, but not Panglossian, in the face of difficult facts). I asked if they would like to start meeting regularly to see if a bunch of smart people with diverse experiences could come up with a good idea for a business. None were interested. I don't blame them, entrepreneurial behavior isn't in everyone's blood. But I don't believe in closing doors, either. I'm no enterpreneur - but when your back is against the wall, you can either push up further against it and hope you get thinner, or push back against the forces putting you there. Jobs had a love for what he did, and he expected other people to share that love. I can respect that immensely. So few of us have the opportunity to do what we love, let alone love what we do.
#2.1.1.1.1
Bulldog
on
2011-10-12 10:31
(Reply)
I don't want to Godwin this discussion because I find it tremendously interesting from several perspectives, but isn't what you are saying akin to Italians looking at Mussolini and saying - "Yeah, but he made the trains run on time!"? I'm not trying to be a smart ass here, but "Yeah - I know some kids got burned and they now have lung cancer, but dude - that iTouch is WAY cool!!" doesn't seem to me to be a really socially aware concept.
There's a saying among those of us who have gone through substance abuse recovery that goes like this: "Yeah, he's an asshole, but he's a sober asshole". Put another way, you can be a successful innovator and business man, but if you know that you are taking the lives and health of others to be successful, then no amount of glossing over that because you build cool things makes you a humanitarian and somebody to be admired. You can make all the great speeches at college commencements you can fit into your schedule but all your success that you are trying to demonstrate to graduates with all those grandiose words are the net result of feudal peasantry are lies because they are based on the suffering of others. Is life "fair"? No, it is not fair at all - I'm living proof of it. If life were fair I wouldn't have RA or have obtained a substance abuse problem or lost my job as Texaco because I couldn't go an hour without hitting a bottle or have advanced spinal stenosis and three bulging discs - yeah, life isn't "fair". But the fact that "life isn't fair" doesn't mean that one human being can't be fair to another human being. Life not being fair doesn't mean that you get to treat those who labor for you as slaves and indentured servants without any remorse. Life not being fair does not allow you to be celebrated as being a wonderful human being with amazing insight and ability to solve problems and market your slave made goods to the world. If you image is based on nothing more than smoke and mirrors, what is your true worth to society? I submit that it is next to zero.
#2.1.1.1.1.1
Tom Francis
on
2011-10-12 11:47
(Reply)
By the way, your story about you and your fellow unemployed neighbors doesn't surprise me at all.
If there was one thing I noticed about corporate engineering was that you had one guy who was perfectly content to get his assignment, sit in his cubicle, do his research, get the job done and wait for the next assignment. The other guy would get his assignment and a couple of days later would pop into the office with an idea that he'd like an extra couple of days to work through a proposal. The majority of engineers were like the first one - the gems were the later ones. Sad as it is to say, a majority of the unemployed are also like the first one - just waiting to be told what to do or have a job drop into their laps rather than brain storm and network to move on or into a different direction.
#2.1.1.1.1.1.1
Tom Francis
on
2011-10-12 12:08
(Reply)
No, my argument is nothing like what you compared it to.
I can see how you would perceive it as such. However, there is (at times) a need to take a larger view of things. As feeblemind points out below, the horrible conditions we are concerned with may actually represent an improvement in some cultures. I'm not making this judgement here, just putting some perspective on things. It's quite possible Apple sweatshops made life worse for those people. I'm willing to bet it didn't, though. The problem we're faced with is one of relativity. When I returned from my honeymoon at an exotic locale known for frequent hurricanes, I was amazed at the shanties the people lived in, quite happily and comfortably. They recognized the foolishness of overextending expenditures on things that could easily be destroyed by nature. Naturally, the one extreme leftist in the office would only talk about how they had to live this way because first worlders like me "kept them down". I laughed and said "sure, go live there and convince them of this point." Fact is, those people loved what my wife, myself, and other tourists brought them - a livelihood. They didn't care if they didn't live in as nice a house as we did, they lived well enough for their own good. In most of the cases I've seen where companies go abroad, the original idea is to find cheap labor. After being whereever they are for a while, something happens - a journalist visits, a worker dies, a town gets sick - and attention is raised to the conditions. While it is not universally the case, it is fairly common at this point for US firms to improve conditions and start making things better. Would I like that every firm walks in, fixes things so it's perfect immediately and from the start? Yes. But I'm also not blind to reality. Having managed many projects which start out poorly and sluggishly, I recognize that every project reaches a crossroads where decisions of a consequential nature have to be made. Assuming a corporation walked in and designed the perfect outsourcing program, I can assure you that within a year or two, there would still be complaints about the company. Why? Because we are human. And we're rarely happy with the status quo. Even the people (who I agree, most of them do live this way) who want to be told what to do and when to do it want to keep moving forward somehow. Usually in terms of income. As a result, we all have corporate offices which are rife with dissatisfaction, disgruntled workers, and various other complainers. I've never worked at a company that is 100% happy. I hear Google is like that, though. Of course, if you ever visit their offices, you'll recognize the obvious signs of brainwashing going on all over the place (really - workers who make Lego busts of Brin and Page?). So I disagree with your premise that because I have a cool thing the other stuff doesn't matter. It matters quite a bit. But when the overall benefit supplied by the corporation is placed in balance, it clearly tilts one way and not the other. Does that make the negative stuff meaningless? Absolutely not - it's just a question of overall value determination.
#2.1.1.1.1.1.2
Bulldog
on
2011-10-12 13:48
(Reply)
We are just not going to agree on this so I'll take a pass on it. I think you are very wrong on this, but at least your honest about how you feel and that counts for something.
As feeblemind points out below, the horrible conditions we are concerned with may actually represent an improvement in some cultures. Unbelievable. I cannot not conceive how a rational person with all the blessings we have as Americans saying something like that. I am completely at a loss. {i]I'm not making this judgement here, just putting some perspective on things.[/i] And that's the problem in a nut shell. I can accept because I have "perspective". We hear that from the left all the time - us conservatives are cretins because we lack "perspective" on the larger picture. We lack the necessary "perspective" to understand the subtle nuances of reality. I'm sorry man, but I ain't buying it. What's right is right and what's wrong is wrong - there ain't no middle ground in which to hide behind "perspective". And with that I'm taking a Sabbatical from Maggie's Farm - maybe to get some reality based perspective. I cannot believe that I'm the only one who sees exactly what evil is wrought in the name of "perspective" and corporate profit when slave labor and human trafficking are part of the equation and yet the perpetrator is lauded as a national hero because we can jog listening to music. Y'all take care - happy upcoming holidays to all. See 'ya around.
#2.1.1.1.1.1.2.1
Tom Francis
on
2011-10-12 20:31
(Reply)
I hope you come back. although I may be booted off the island by then anyhows...
#2.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.1
Bomber Girl
on
2011-10-12 21:18
(Reply)
I accept that you won't ever agree with my position, but I'm trying to think of a means by which one can simply improve things immediately in another country.
In other words, if you're a poor non-working slob in Vietnam, barely surviving or getting by, and a company shows up, sets up a plant, and you get a job....suddenly you've got food and a place to live. OK, it's not perfect, the conditions may be deplorable and you're working 100 hours a week. But that's what life was like here in the US for many years, until the economy matured. We look back and thump our chests about how far we've come, and that's great for us. But we can't just show up in other countries, provide jobs and move them from point A to point Q in one fell swoop. Life doesn't work that way. We may wish it did, but it just doesn't. Which gets back to my point about my honeymoon. Those people didn't live well at all, but they were quite happy with how they lived. There is an old story of the 3rd world fisherman who is approached by a Wall Street banker who asks what he's doing. Fishing, the man replies. Do you fish all day? No, the man replies, I fish until I have enough food, then I go play my guitar in town. The Wall Street banker then says "why don't you fish all day, catch as much as you can, sell the extras, then over time you can buy some boats and catch more fish and hire people?" The man says this sounds interesting, but why would he do this? The Wall Street man says to get rich. How long would it take to get rich? Several years, with lots of hard work. After I get rich, what would I do? The Wall Street banker says, "whatever you want - go into town and play your guitar, if you'd like." The man smiled at the banker, and went back to fishing.
#2.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.2
Bulldog
on
2011-10-12 21:26
(Reply)
I am sorry to see you go. I certainly don't think everyone must agree on things, and I can appreciate when people believe in their views and can support them.
#2.1.1.1.1.1.2.1.3
Bulldog
on
2011-10-12 21:31
(Reply)
http://www.deepcapture.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/deepcapture-the-story-v1.pdf
and http://www.deepcapture.com/the-miscreants-global-bust-out-preface/ will answer that question. From FEC records....
Jobs, Steven P Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Apple Computer/CEO Rahm Emanuel (D) House (IL District: 05) FRIENDS OF RAHM EMANUEL $1,000 general 03/25/04 Jobs, Stephen P. Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Apple Computer/Chairman Rahm Emanuel (D) House (IL District: 05) FRIENDS OF RAHM EMANUEL $1,000 primary 08/30/01 JOBS, STEVE WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 APPLE COMPUTERS DNC-NON-FEDERAL INDIVIDUAL (soft-money donation) - $50,000 primary 11/01/00 JOBS, STEVEN P WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 APPLE COMPUTER MARCH FOR PROGRESS, INC. (D) - $4,000 primary 01/10/00 JOBS, STEVEN P WALNUT CREEK, CA 94956 APPLE COMPUTER Edward M. Kennedy (D) Senate - MA KENNEDY FOR SENATE 2000 $1,000 general 12/30/99 JOBS, STEVEN P WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596 APPLE COMPUTER Edward M. Kennedy (D) Senate - MA KENNEDY FOR SENATE 2000 $1,000 primary 12/30/99 Jobs, Steven Mr. Palo Alto, CA 94301 Apple Computer/Pixar Animation Stud Bill Bradley (D) President BILL BRADLEY FOR PRESIDENT INC $500 primary 03/17/99 JOBS, STEVE PALO ALTO, CA 94301 PIXAR Nancy Pelosi (D) House (CA District: 08) NANCY PELOSI FOR CONGRESS $1,000 primary 05/12/98 JOBS, STEVEN P SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 APPLE COMPUTER DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE (D) - $5,000 primary 12/08/97 JOBS, STEVEN P SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 APPLE COMPUTER DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE (D) - $10,000 primary 06/06/97 JOBS, STEVEN P SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 DSCC NON-FEDERAL INDIVIDUALS (soft-money donation) - $50,000 primary 10/29/96 JOBS, STEVEN PAUL REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 PIXAR ANIMATION STUDIOS DNC-NON-FEDERAL INDIVIDUAL (soft-money donation) - $2,500 primary 08/07/96 JOBS, STEVEN P REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 DNC-NON-FEDERAL INDIVIDUAL (soft-money donation) - $100,000 primary 04/10/96 JOBS, STEVEN LOS GATOS, CA 95030 APPLE COMPUTER MCCLOSKEY, PAUL N JR (R) Senate - CA CALIFORNIANS FOR MCCLOSKEY $1,000 primary 05/19/82 JOBS, STEVEN LOS GATOS, CA 95030 APPLE COMPUTER BROWN, EDMOND G JR (D) Senate - CA BROWN FOR U S SENATE $1,000 primary 05/19/82 The point being? His politics didn't mimic his work ethic? Happens all the time. Warren Buffett, as a case in point....
Doesn't make him any less admirable for what he's accomplished or how he inspired people. I do agree that he made things better, but the jury remains out on whether he made things better. That's probably just the Luddite in me thinking. I do have his "Your time is limited... Everything else is secondary" quote on the desktop of my 2004 MacBook this week in homage to the man.
As much as I disagree with the OWS movement, the fact they are able to pull it off is indicative of how Jobs made things better.
His impact on society has been overwhelmingly positive, even if people I disagree with are using his innovations to support and promote their misguided views. I have been able to return to listening to music because of his innovations. Before the iPod/iPhone revolution, it was too much of a pain to bring music with me on the train or the office. CDs were definitely an improvement over tapes (I know audiophiles may disagree), but my life is definitely better now because I can listen to the music I enjoy whenever and wherever I want. He changed the entertainment industry for the better, in my opinion (again, I'm sure others would disagree). He made using a computer fun. Microsoft made it efficient. Both have value, both made it better. I'd have to go with he made ahem...leaned on the wrong button, apparently....
I'd say he made things better and he made things better. A concern, eh? That's one of the myriad of reasons this country is in the shape it is in. When Apple realizes 400% profit margins you'd think they could throw a few bones of low wage minimal jobs this country's way.
By the way, from my fairly extensive reading about the man, Tesla wasn't an asshole. Perhaps that is why hardly anyone knows of him and his elemental contributions to our electrified world. I'm a huge fan of Tesla, less so of Edison.
If you read "Empires of Light", the case for Tesla over Edison is open and shut. Tesla was creative, visionary and often gave his ideas away. I have no problem with Apple at all. I don't think corporations are beholden to do anything just because we want them to. They are supposed to pursue shareholder interests. If you want them to supply low wage labor, buy up the stock and start pushing for it. "If you want them to supply low wage labor, buy up the stock and start pushing for it."
Though a fine and obvious rebuttal it elides my point, really. Thus, I guess, why so many sheep shuttle up to the Apple trough. When it comes to computers of all shapes and sizes, I reserve my profound admiration and gratitude for Thomas Watson Jr., even as I type this post using an Apple Mac Pro computer. If Steve Jobs had tall shoulders to stand on, giant-like, they were those of Thomas Watson.
Jobs had a unique mix of entrepreneurial qualities that enabled him to take a business started in his garage to the top tier of the business world.
I stand in awe of that feat alone. Very few men can do that. But on top of that, after he is kicked out of his company and his ousters had run it into the ground, he comes back and resurrects it. Another awesome feat. AS for outsourcing and sweat shop labor, it is important to consider what that labor would do were it not toiling in said sweatshop. Would they be working at all? Would they or their families be eating regularly? It's a tough world and not everyone gets a job with enough pay to buy a house and car. yep --you're right. Every ladder has a bottom --if it didn't, it would be useless except for those who are lucky enough to have a jet pack.
Somebody needs to ask the actual workers in the sweat shops --before they start campaigning in their behalf. Or, check into the history of workers who've lost their jobs because western consumers felt that the jobs were exploitive and deserved to evaporate. I hate to sound like a heartless plutocrat, so i denounce myself, with vigor. |
Recently, I posted about Steve Jobs. I believe, despite faults which he undoubtedly possessed, Steve was a visionary who radically altered our lives for the better over the last thirty years. Were it not for his untimely passing, he
Tracked: Oct 31, 11:21