Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, August 10. 2011"The breakdown of the family lies behind all other urban dysfunction."From Heather: Back to the Future on Poverty Policy - Mayor Bloomberg’s latest program is a greatest-hits package of failed ideas. One quote:
Also,
Bloomberg, Soros, et al are insane. That's not a diagnosis: it means that they are not in reality. I doubt that either of them have ever sat down and talked to a 16 year-old single high school drop-out mother of three who happily and willingly consigned herself and her kids to a life of dependency and dysfunction. Have a kid? Get your own apartment! And a check from the city! And free medical care and food stamps! Why not? Their moms did the same thing. Normalization of dysfunction and dependency. The government incentives are perverse, and it's on our nickel.
Posted by The Barrister
in Hot News & Misc. Short Subjects, Our Essays, Politics
at
14:31
| Comments (9)
| Trackback (1)
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
After 30 years in and around govt social programs, the only ones that work are those that the staff has cared about the clients. Where no personal careing is offered there is only failure. That careing relationship must also instill self-discipline and a new set of values to be permenant. Of course, not every client will accept the careing and will not change.
what is being talked about is brokeness -- broken families, broken relationships and broken lives. Another program that does not address the brokeness will fail. JP 'Broken' reminds of Broken Trails, wherein the old cowpoke played by Robert Duvall has to say a few words over the grave of his tragic Chinese ladyfriend, and so quietly intones,
"We're all travelers on this earth ...from the sweet grass to the packin' house ...from birth to death ...we travel between the eternities." BTW, one wonders at the inexplicable obtuseness of the president and his economics team, in the light of such facts as Georger Soros having been originally bankrolled by the Rothschild family, and his stated lifelong calling to depose the Dollar as the world reserve currency, and his 'gone underground' announcement just before the Standard & Poors downgrade, Standard & Poors being a McGraw Hill company, and MH being largely controlled in the deep theme way by Evelyn Rothschild. Here, read a bit of this --ignore the Prison Planet if you're suspicious of such, and go to the Financial Times, several down from top, as 'FT'.
http://www.bing.com/search?q=evelyn+rothschild+mcgraw+hill+&form=IE8SRC&src=IE-SearchBox Stuff creeps me out in the worst way. Like the second-tier gods of Olympus in Hellenic myth, always playing games against each other via the lives of mortals on the earth below. Well, do you have any idea how hard it is for a baby daddy to bond with his babies when they're in so many different houses? I mean, come on, people!
By destroying history's most bountiful economy, Obama is attempting to make all Americans dependent on the U.S. Government for their very survival.
In other words, people of the government, by the government, and for the government. In my days as a police officer, the closest I ever came to shooting another human being was in a drunken domestic dispute over the custody of 4 small children. Neither party cared a whit for the children. Both wanted the welfare check that went with them. While I am all for helping children, subsidizing amoral mothers who regard children as little more than a source of income is clearly subsidizing failure and is literally a modern form of slavery.
I loved the line about Bloomberg's support for marriage among gays (which I personally do support) and his apathy about marriage among parents so they can raise their children in families. Yes, something is seriously fouled up there.
Government intervention has been a big factor in family breakdown. The phenomenon is old, old, old -- mothers have driven off fathers and fathers have bolted for centuries. It's the rate that has become ridiculous, and the fact that some communities in the larger society think it's okay and the other communities are paying for it. Then we hit the hard part: if we stop caring for the children in order to stop rewarding the parents, what happens to them? What opened my eyes to the dysfunctional nature of "social welfare" supporting single parent families was a PBS show I saw back in the 1980s. The show featured a 21 year old single mother of five young children. Not surprisingly, the household was a madhouse. The mother had no control over, a.k.a. no rapport with, her five young children.
A middle aged social worker opined how this poor overwhelmed mother needed help. Help from the government, of course. I assume this was the intended lesson from the creators of this TV program. But the lesson I derived from the show was somewhat different: what is the point of the government funding a stupid fool who by the age of 21 has five children and no male partner to support her? Why didn't the social workers step in after the first child and inform the mother: we will support this child and no more. Moreover, we are going after the father for child support. "Social welfare" aided, abetted and enabled this dysfunctional situation from the very start. |
Tracked: Aug 10, 19:01