Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, July 3. 2010A re-post. Cities for Living: A righteous attack on Le CorbusierQuote from an essay of the above title by Roger Scruton in City Journal:
Read the whole thing. Photo below: The charming, friendly, safe, and human-scale Chelsea neighborhood of Manhattan, which was a crime-ridden "slum" one generation ago, part of Hell's Kitchen. Ripe for massive demolition and "urban planning" and "urban renewal." The social engineers are almost always wrong because they are oblivious to human nature. This one-time slum is a very pleasant place to live in, provided that your neighbors behave themselves. Don't blame the old buildings.
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I read a column in (I believe) the NY Sun earlier this week about NY backsliding. I didn't notice anything like that in midtown, but Hell's Kitchen had noticeably more sleazy bums harassing people on the last trip than it did the year before. Maybe Mayor Mike should do something besides harass gun stores in neighboring states.
Mayor Mike, dare I say it, is a pussy, and he is riding on Rudy's accomplishments.
These comments on architecture apply as well to economics. Presumably your comment "The social engineers are almost always wrong because they are oblivious to human nature" was leading to that point?
I've yet to have neighbors that "behave themselves". I prefer living in the country clinging to my guns and religion.
David Szondy also attacks Le Corbusier at:
http://davidszondy.com/future/city/corbusier.htm But even so, I still like it. Does this mean that I've fallen sway to the Communist lie of quick fixes that will change human nature? Am I no longer a conservative if I like futuristic architecture? Aren't we living in a time of exponential increase in technological progress? What about the astro-architecture of the 1950s? Don't you like the optimism? Should our spaceships have facades, cornices and mouldings? Densely populated cities with geographic barriers always have problems when the Busybody Brigade tries to substitute quick fixes for human scale living. In the process, they frequently lose the old but still usable buildings which give the city its human-scale charm. The city we live in [Houston] has few if any geographic barriers, but still we have densely populated areas, which decline when neglected. I'm a great proponent of one and two-story houses, although there are few of those in New York City, and Houston is getting its share of McMansions here in my subdivision.
I remember Hell's Kitchen from the days when I attended Columbia University, and it was, as the name indicates, a bit of a hellhole then. But the Chelsea pictured above is charming. It became that way when individual families bought the old houses and renovated them instead of building big new government apartments. Chicago, which has some terrible slums, has not solved its problems with big government projects like Cabrini-Green, which simply concentrate the criminality. Big government architecture is not the answer to the problem. Dependable policing and responsible ownership are. Marianne I've seen some beautiful Corbusier designs. I don't think you can get much lovelier than Notre Dame du Haut. The problem with his style was that it was singularly ill adapted to being copied by mediocre talents, in whose hands it becomes shoddy and boring. I suppose all styles suffer when copied by second-rate practitioners, but there are traditional and vernacular styles that hold up much better than the International or Bauhaus style. I'm not sure why that should be, but it is. You have only to look at the average highrise to see the principle in action.
There's a difference between Corbusier's vision for architecture and his vision for urban planning. One can reject the latter while still being appreciative of elements of the former.
In a recent visit to NYC, I was impressed to see some relatively new construction in SoHo/Lower East Side. That could have been the first construction in that neighborhood in a century.
Say it isn't so...
Market forces actually work? Letting individuals renovate and restore neighborhoods works better than top down management? How can this be? Praising a place like Chelsea is simply parroting the opposite pose in modern urban planning - the pining of Jane Jacobs and her followers for "mixed use, small scale" communities that they remember fondly from their bohemian youth.
They are remembering neighborhoods that were in transition - it was the waning of American manufacturing that made those lofts and brownstones affordable to students and bohemians - and a lot of misguided "preservation" efforts are wasted trying to preserve what is essentially transient. Both Jacobs and LeCorbusier - though opposite in physical plan and effect - are too heavy with dreams. Cities are shaped by realism - neighborhoods rise, fall, and revive based on stark, inevitable economic and social realities. Many aspects of the small, tightly-knit urban neighborhood will not ever return. They were of their time - a time of massive immigration, an America in the full rush of industrialization. Now the "preservationists" want to keep city folk from shopping at Walmart. Why? This is not preservation - it's Disneyfication. The photo reminds me of the Mexican War section of Pittsburgh. A very friendly neighborhood if short on parking.
|
Maggie's Farm links to "a righteous attack on Le Corbusier" by Roger Scruton in City Journal. I took my own shots at Mr. Jeanneret a few years back, in a long, long post with heavy assists from Tom Wolfe and...
Tracked: Jul 06, 16:29