Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, January 27. 2025Monday morning links
Why don't we fall out of bed while we sleep? The Strange Power of Laughter - An anthropologist explores laughter as a The uses of apophasis Professor: Gender studies made me realize X-Men’s Wolverine is ‘toxic’ masculinity Prof says 'all hell broke loose' at Harvard after his study found no racial bias in police shootings ‘I’m already done with version 2.0’: Inside federal agencies where workers fear for jobs under Trump’s administration Trump is everywhere again. The president’s first week showed a stark contrast with his predecessor. Trump 2.0: A Shockwave of Change in Just Six Days - Trump 2.0 storms Colombia Offers Presidential Plane To Repatriate Illegal Aliens After Trump Slaps Country With Sweeping Sanctions Another Hoax Blows Up! Democrat Gov Pritzker, Fake News Media Falsely Does China have a cheap AI? Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Professor: Gender studies made me realize X-Men’s Wolverine is ‘toxic’ masculinity
Professor, show me on this doll where the X-man touched you. After slogging through the tale of the Canadian soy boy professor getting his panties all in a bunch over a cartoon character, I wonder who’s dumber, him for having written it on me for wasting my time reading it.
Real Canadian women totally reject this soyboy's conclusions. But then real Canadian women are usually partnered with real Canadian men, to the advantage of both.
Why don't we fall out of bed while we sleep? QUOTE: Adults generally remain more still, but alcohol can disrupt the body's ability to keep muscles at rest. "This increases the likelihood of falling out of bed," he says. Been there, done that. From a 12-foot deck to a nice, soft lawn. Bedding down sober is w-a-a-y safer. QUOTE: The uses of apophasis Brutus sets as a condition of allowing Antony to speak to “not in your funeral speech blame us”. QUOTE: When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff: Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honourable man. The CDC now admits that red states got specific batches of covid-19 shots that were more deadly than the shots given in blue states. It appears that the lethality of the covid vaccine was known early on and someone thought it would be a good idea to send the most deadly vaccine to red states. The search for who might have done this was narrowed down by the last administration when preemptive pardons were issued.
OneGuy: The CDC now admits that red states got specific batches of covid-19 shots that were more deadly than the shots given in blue states.
QUOTE: The CDC has made no such admission and no reports of deadly batches of COVID-19 vaccines have been reported. Social media posts spreading the erroneous information are relying on a flawed analysis published by a website known to spread false information. And who made the false analysis of "safe and effective".
This is how you know it's true! Zach passes 20, 30, 40 posts but jumps on anything that makes the Democrats look bad. Zach is a paid disinformation influencer or a bot.
Zach... Are you still denying that covid originated in the Wuhan lab or are your handlers still telling you to deny it??? Serious question. OneGuy: Serious question.
We responded to a demonstrable misstatement concerning a CDC ‘admission’, which never occurred. Thought you might be interested in the truth. Stockman: America's Fiscal Doomsday Machine Must Be Stopped
QUOTE: When Ronald Reagan was elected in 1980 on a call to bring the nation’s inflationary budget under control, the public debt was $930 billion and about 30 percent of GDP. By the time Donald Trump was elected the first time it had erupted to $20 trillion, which has now become $36 trillion and 125 percent of GDP. Moreover, by the end of this decade the Federal fiscal equation will be going supercritical without sweeping budget reductions at the level of the DOGE target. Thus, by FY 2034 the annual baseline deficit according to CBO will total $2.9 trillion and 7 percent of GDP. . . . CBO inexplicably projects that 7 percent of GDP deficits and annual interest expense of $1.7 trillion or 4.1 percent of GDP by 2034 would be compatible with a weighted average yield on nearly $60 trillion of public debt of just 3.4 percent. . . . Give the average yield just another 250 basis points, however, and now you have $3.1 trillion of annual debt service expense and a $4 trillion annual deficit by 2034. In short, there is a doom-loop building inside the Federal fiscal equation . . . If sweeping budget retrenchment does not occur soon, in fact, soaring interest expense will ignite a veritable fiscal wildfire. On paper, the public debt would power upward unabated to $150 trillion or 166 percent of GDP by mid-century (2054) under CBO’s current Rosy Scenario projections. Of course, long before the debt actually hits this staggering figure, the whole system would implode. Every remnant of America as we now know it would go down the tubes. https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/stockman-americas-fiscal-doomsday-machine-must-be-stopped QUOTE: On paper, the public debt would power upward unabated to $150 trillion or 166 percent of GDP by mid-century (2054) under CBO’s current Rosy Scenario projections. Not to minimize the problem, but Japan has a debt-to-GDP over 200%. It tends to slow their economic growth, but it has not been catastrophic. QUOTE: By the time Donald Trump was elected the first time it had erupted to $20 trillion, which has now become $36 trillion and 125 percent of GDP. Much of the increase was during Trump's administration. QUOTE: So we need to be clear that the DOGE team of Musk and Ramaswamy must focus on savings of $2 trillion per year commencing relatively soon. What could they cut that would yield $2 trillion in savings per year? The articles suggests the usual "waste", reducing the military budget, and reducing "low-priority" entitlements; none of which constitute anywhere near $2 trillion. Nor does the article consider taxes to help reduce the deficit. If the budget is in a "doom-loop", then surely taxes should be considered. For the rest of us, Quibble-DickZ.
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/reps/dr-paul-releases-2024-festivus-report-on-government-waste/ Inflation is a horrific tax that we all pay. Look at the Dow/Gold ratio to see it has been out of control since 1999 and accelerating in the wrong direction. Like all progressive/socialists you want even more tax besides the inflation tax.
Fantastic idea. Increase taxes, depress economic activity and further reduce people's already weakening spending power. What didn't we all think of it?
DeGaulle: Increase taxes, depress economic activity and further reduce people's already weakening spending power.
There are no cuts than can bring the budget into balance without reducing Social Security and Medicare spending. If Americans want to maintain these social programs and also bring the budget into balance, then it will require additional revenues. I would vote for the medicare/medicaid cuts. When an illegal hits the emergency room, who pays? When an illegal hits the maternity ward, who pays?
That is just the start. Where do the cash cards come from? Where do the cell phones come from? Who pays for their housing? We still haven't touched Ukraine, medical research reform or education reform. Every single spending program needs reform.
#5.1.3.1.1
indyjonesouthere
on
2025-01-27 17:25
(Reply)
You obviously have no idea of the trouble your country is in. The money for social security won't be there. It'll all be used up servicing the debt and the people will not have any more money left to give. If you take it off them, you'll merely create more demand for social security while simultaneously killing the private sector economy by bleeding people of their ability to consume. The end result being nobody having anything.
#5.1.3.1.2
DeGaulle
on
2025-01-28 15:22
(Reply)
DeGaulle: The money for social security won't be there.
Ignoring the point doesn't make it go away. Yes, the debt is an issue for the Americans. However, they have the largest developed economy in the world. There is no reason they can't meet their obligations. To maintain fiscal discipline, they can either cut Social Security and Medicare or they can raise sufficient taxes to pay for the benefits. Are you saying the United States can't afford to pay a pension and provide healthcare to the elderly? Yes, taxes tend to reduce economic growth—but so does excessive debt. USGDP is about $27 trillion. Federal spending is about $7 trillion. The most workable policy is to pay down debt during economic expansions. But hyperventilating is not a policy prescription. Either cut social programs or raise taxes or both. There is nothing preventing the United States from meeting its obligations. Guess the Americans think it's more fun to beat up on gays transexuals, while being distracted as their pockets are being picked.
#5.1.3.1.2.1
Zachriel
on
2025-01-28 16:42
(Reply)
Zach, baby, perhaps forcing the snivel servants to return to their offices and actually perform their duties would ensure a reduction as would weed out those whose ideas of "work" was minimal toil and maximum personal time.
Frances: perhaps forcing the snivel servants to return to their offices and actually perform their duties would ensure a reduction as would weed out those whose ideas of "work" was minimal toil and maximum personal time.
You could lay off the entire civilian federal workforce; border, drug and food, weather, space, administrators for Social Security and Medicare, defense and security (the largest portion), bank regulators, etc; and not save anywhere close enough to balance the federal budget. Given that you would want to balance the budget, what would you suggest? BD and crew, thanks for the Trump links. They are wonderful to read and reread.
|