We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
Asking it a question like that isn't any different than a basic e-search. It can create things based on its own e-searches.
I know some people I work with use it to compose memos, policies, and various forms. It seems like it takes just as long tweaking one of those as it does to create it yourself.
I talked to a vendor that uses it to dumb down his emails into 6th grade reading level for his co-workers. He said it works great.
I know a lot of people do not like ChatGPT but I have been having a lot of fun with it. I made a YouTube film this year where I played four parts and one of them was a devil and one was a lawyer and I needed to use ChatGPT to give me the legal reasons a document with the devil was not going to hold up in court and ChatGPT did a wonderful job. I have also used it to give me good questions to ask my doctor about a symptom. It doesn't like to answer really hard questions about immigration and social problems and sometimes makes things up but overall it's been a positive experience
#2
Robert Moffett
(Link)
on
2024-12-19 17:19
(Reply)
I find Perplexity very useful for researching topics; you get a lot less irrelevant trash than you do with Google, and it does provide links to sources. But you can't totally trust it. I asked it to review a book written by someone I know, and it came back with a pretty solid review. But then I asked it a follow-up question (about one specific character in the book) and it went totally crazy, started giving responses from a totally different book with the same title but with a different author.
#3
David Foster
(Link)
on
2024-12-19 18:59
(Reply)
I asked ChatGPT to give me the top reasons why Global warming
skeptics were skeptical about man-made global warming, and ChatGPT refused to do so, claiming that the argument against man-made global warming had no merit.
After debating it for a while, ChatGPT finally admitted that global warming is still a theory and cannot be proved one way or another. It also claimed that we humans still do not know the current global temperature.