Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Tuesday, August 13. 2024Tuesday morning linksWhy People Don’t Like Illegal Immigration I like legal immigration TWO CANDIDATES, NOT ONE DAY IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR: European Union Tyrants Send Letter to Elon Musk – DEMAND X Owner Elon Musk CENSOR President Donald Trump During Upcoming Interview Tonight Elon Musk To Disgraced Former Scottish Minister Threatening Legal Action: “Make my day” Google Admits to Changing Search Results for ‘Trump Assassination’ Searches and Much More Meta, Google, and TikTok take down posts that have led to real-world violence, but X pushes back as Elon Musk tweets insults at the UK's prime minister and posts 'civil war is inevitable.' We Need a Badass in the White House Joseph Klein: "my disgust with Trump is deeper, more personal. He made a mockery of the values and issues and study to which I devoted my life..." That is immature Trump on X Taps Into a Voting Bloc That Legacy Media Doesn't Even Know Exists The 7 States That Will Decide the Election Kamala the Seductress Van Jones: Harris Is Getting More Attention, Doesn’t Need to Talk to Press Right Now That's true “I think the one advantage that Harris may have is that there’s less than 100 days to go,” True - no time to learn about her You can tell it’s a working-class election by Harris and Walz’s dishonesty and lies Golly, Why Are Kamala's Politics So Hard to Pin Down? It's on purpose JD Vance Continues to Own the Libs With His Sunday Show Appearances The Oppressive Exuberance of the Harris-Walz Pageant The Scramble For Europe Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
re Golly, Why Are Kamala's Politics So Hard to Pin Down?
It's on purpose Yes. I think the answer is twofold. 1) They want to cover up her Bolshevik past/record. 2) They want to make her a "blank slate" in the 0bama mold. That way people can project their political desires on to her and will have to vote for her to see what they actually get. She is a Marxist through and through.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1815057918229975147?refresh=1721582890 https://x.com/KarluskaP/1819201391337799708 There is a reason Obama wanted her on the ticket at the very start. Harris To Voters: You Have To Elect Me To Find Out What I’m For
https://issuesinsights.com/2024/08/13/harris-to-voters-you-have-to-elect-me-to-find-out-what-im-for/ For Queen Kamala, Media Are Trying to Create ‘Hope and Change,’ Version 2.0
https://www.dailysignal.com/2024/08/13/queen-kamala-media-are-trying-create-hope-change-version-2-0/ “I think the one advantage that Harris may have is that there’s less than 100 days to go[.]"
That, and she's not White and not male. I do not agree with making tips a non-taxable income. It makes no sense at all except to try to buy votes with someone else's money. Our taxes should be fair and not used as a political club or carrot. We should have a flat tax system. Perhaps 10% minimum on all income and two graduations of 20% and 30% at higher income levels. No deductions, no exemptions, no special treatment.
Same thing for the child tax credit. The tax system shouldn't leave anyone so broke that they must be handed money to support their family. A proper tax system wouldn't take so much money from you that they had to give some back to raise your children. Those criticisms are ill-thought out.
These are just ways to adjust the tax tables to favor lower income earners. They are no different from making a "proper tax system" except they are easier to target the intended taxpayers this way. The child tax credit is no different than increasing the deduction for dependent children for low income families, or exempting them from payroll taxes ... which the child tax credit is intended to refund to those families. Almost any attempt to simplify the tax code will make it less fair. Fairness comes from realizing that distinctions need to be made between taxpayers who are situated differently. Those math-ignorant, reading comprehension-challenged taxpayers are who argue for simplification. "The child tax credit is no different than increasing the deduction for dependent children for low income families." Hum. Odd that congress didn't just lower the child deduction for lower income families then. Or alternatively, you're wrong. Tax credits mean that low-income parents get refunds that exceed their total FIT with-holding. Deductions never reduce one's FIT burden below $0.
"or exempting them from payroll taxes." Except that exempting them from payroll taxes hastens the date on which social security is bankrupt and lowers their future social security benefit. "Almost any attempt to simplify the tax code will make it less fair." Short of providing an operational definition for "fair" That claim isn't an argument. It's an opinion that isn't relevant to what the optimal tax policy is. "Those math-ignorant, reading comprehension-challenged taxpayers are who argue [against] simplification." Unlike you, I'm not an expert on math ignorant. reading comprehension-challenged thinking. But I think you've given us a good demonstration of it. The child tax credit is a nonrefundable tax credit available to taxpayers with dependent children under the age of 17. The credit can reduce your tax bill on a dollar-for-dollar basis.
So your "Tax credits mean that low-income parents get refunds that exceed their total FIT with-holding. Deductions never reduce one's FIT burden below $0" is incorrect. Credits can be refundable or nonrefundable. The child tax credit is nonrefundable. This is what I mean when I say reading-comprehension challenged. Read what the tax code actually says. "Read what the tax code actually says." Not bad advice. Took me less than a minute to discover that the IRS says child tax credit is 80% refundable. Which makes me 80% correct and you 100% wrong. And raises a few questions. Did you just pull your "factual" assertion out of your rear, or did you knowingly lie, or are you just really, really bad at reading comprehension? And, subsidiarily, are you actually a country lawyer? If so, you owe your clients an apology and a refund.
Don't misunderstand, you may or may not have something of value to say about tax policy. But you've failed to say it so far. What you have done is S-talk in every single comment you've made in this thread. If you're going to simultaneously S-talk and not make any real contribution to the conversation, then you deserve mockery for making such a basic factual error while attempting to correct one you claim someone else has made.
#3.1.1.1.1
James4HJ
on
2024-08-14 17:30
(Reply)
If you were Zach I would know your motives. But I admit I don't know your motives and will give you the benefit of the doubt.
Tax, all taxes, are a terrible thing. If I were to tax you, YOU would have me jailed. It is theft under the threat of arrest and prison. But we can all agree that governments need some money to function so we have selected various taxes to provide that money. You don't have to be very smart to realize that the balance of power on taxes has been very badly tipped in the favor of government. They have misused the power we gave them to provide a minimum government and have created a bloated and all powerful government that wastes at least half of the tax revenues we send them. One of the ways they do this is to carve out special interest groups and reward them in turn for votes. FRAUD in other words. We allow this by not stopping it. We can't stop it because the government taxes the few to give to the many and the many elect the politicians. My suggestion is part of the reason this works is so many pay no taxes. Therefore I suggest everyone with any kind of income pay a minimum tax on the full amount, no deductions or exemptions. BUT it gets worse. They have bastardized the tax code to make it welfare. You don't need to have paid a penny in tax to get a "refund", sometimes this "refund" is quite sizable. In DC speak this tax code welfare is called a "credit". What YOU are advocating is to continue to steal from the rich to give to the poor so the fraud can continue. In left wing pseudo-liberal/socialist speak this is called "fairness". Well we all know there is nothing "fair about it, it is stealing and voter fraud AND this and other fraudulent schemes by the federal government is exactly what has caused the demise of the black family and an equal number of poor white families. You seem to feel good about this sad state of our government and society and in fact so good that it pleasures you to call anyone who would prefer honest government and a better society "math-ignorant, reading comprehension-challenged taxpayers are who argue for simplification". Makes no sense to me. Except perhaps that you might be a generation X or Millennial. I am pre-boomer and I didn't grow up thinking the government has the right to take by force and buy off voters with the stolen money. I'm too old to change my mind so I guess as Oprah says you will just have to wait until I die. I would favor tax breaks for working parents but is this a rebate of taxes paid or a subsidy received on taxes which you never paid but were paid by other people?
I would support the former but fail to see any benefit to simply handing out more tax money to those who don't work or work very little. "Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods."
- H.L. Mencken Another Green Energy Company Declares Bankruptcy
QUOTE: The 39-year-old SunPower is the latest solar rooftop business to fail this year. Others include Titan Solar Power and Sunworks. SunPower cited a “severe liquidity crisis caused by a sharp decline in demand in the solar market and SunPower’s inability to obtain new capital.” . . . Offshore wind projects are also getting scratched because of rising costs and interest rates that make them uneconomic even with subsidies. BP last year wrote down its U.S. offshore wind business by $1.1 billion. Wind developer Orsted last autumn announced $4 billion in write-downs after walking away from two projects off the New Jersey coast. BP recently scaled back a planned U.S. biofuels investment. Shell this year said it would close its hydrogen refueling stations in California as few people are buying fuel-cell vehicles, and subsidies for hydrogen production have fallen. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/another-green-energy-company-declares-bankruptcy-thank-bidens-tariffs Men who want to lower their risk of a common cancer should masturbate and have sex more, according to research.
Researchers recommended climaxing 21 times per month because the literature suggested it lowered the risk of disease by one-third. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13735387/men-masturbate-prostate-cancer-risk-major-review.html And hey even if it doesn’t at least you'll be grinning a whole lot more.
Joseph Klein starts out but telling your he's got logical reasons. then what he produces are feelings and intuitions about Trump.
Yeah, we already know we are supposed to play Darth Vader background music when Donnie From Queens calls in to the show, but if you don't automatically do that without thinking, you find that Trump is only about 1/3 as bad as accused. Which isn't great, but it's damn sure livable. "Compared to whom" is always a good question. |