Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, July 17. 2023Monday morning linksNews That's Not Fit To Print - New York Times & LA Times Dump Sports Reporting CDC Used Journal To Promote Masks Despite 'Unreliable' And 'Unsupported Data': New Analysis Yonkers’ only charter school illustrates just how broken the system is Without Affirmative Action Everyone Will Die. "All Americans will bear the burden of a less diverse health care field" NYC To Pay Minority Teachers Who Failed Teaching Exam Up To $2M. Each. Parents slam woke Massachusetts school district for axing advanced math classes to boost 'equity', after they attracted too many white and Asian students - with families now forced to hire private tutors instead California Approves New Math Guidelines That Emphasize 'Social Justice' The Fact-Check Racket Finally Unravels Biden forgives $39 billion in student loan debt via administrative tweaks Suckers paid their debts Imploding Cities Will Drag All of Us Down — Even if You Don't Live Anywhere Near One The War On Poverty Hasn’t Just Failed, It’s Failed Abysmally Jennifer Rubin humiliates herself using data from retracted story VDH: Illegal Immigration and Western Spiritual Sickness The Incredible Shrinking NATO Europe's Muslim Migrant Problem ' Arabs… Chechens’: German Swimming Baths Terrorised by ‘Migration Background’ Men Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Biden Proposal Would Give Foreign Climate Group Veto Power Over U.S. Military Contracts
QUOTE: A new Biden administration rule aimed at reducing carbon emissions would give approval authority over large U.S. defense contracts to a little-known British environmentalist group that just incorporated two weeks ago. Under the White House’s proposed rule change, a London-based group called the Science Based Targets Initiative that is funded by the Democratic Party’s main dark money network would be responsible for approving the carbon emissions reduction plans of large federal contractors. The Science Based Targets Initiative (SBTi) is a fee-based service that helps companies set emissions reduction targets in line with the Paris Climate Agreement and verifies their progress. But its foreign status and murky financial background raise questions about the Biden administration’s decision to outsource its vetting process to the group. Critics say the proposal would give SBTi enormous veto power over American defense contracts and access to potentially sensitive data about U.S. military suppliers. https://freebeacon.com/biden-administration/biden-proposal-would-give-foreign-climate-group-veto-power-over-u-s-military-contracts/ "The Incredible Shrinking NATO"
"Submitted by Dmitry Orlov" Boosty? Gosh, now just where might Dmitry and Boosty be located, I wonder? C'mon, Maggie's Farm, you can do better than serve as a gullible information operations outlet for the Kremlin. QUOTE: The War On Poverty Hasn’t Just Failed, It’s Failed Abysmally . . . In 1949, the poverty rate in the United States stood at 34%, which was fully one-third of the nation’s population. Over the next 15 years, without significant government redistribution programs—indeed, without a War on Poverty—the poverty rate fell almost by half, dropping from 34% to 18%, a reduction of a full 16 percentage points. That is not correct. The United States invested heavily in raising people into the middle class through the GI Bill. This corrected the error of previous wars, including the treatment of veterans of the First World War. Unfortunately, racial discrimination meant that many Black veterans did not realize the benefits. "Anticipate charity by preventing poverty, namely, to assist the reduced brother, either by a considerable gift or loan of money, or by teaching him a trade, or by putting him in the way of business, so that he may earn an honest livelihood and not be forced to the dreadful alternative of holding up his hand for charity." — Maimonides Zachriel: Astrophysicist, property lawyer, affirmative action expert, search engine, newspeak dictionary, constitutional scholar, carrier of Trump Derangement Syndrome, master of the non sequitur, pretentious movie critic, high school civics teacher, financial analyst, the ackchyually guy, nitpicker, Historical art critic, armchair expert economist.
But Zach is even more. He is a source of truth and identifying cover-ups. If Zach says it is so then you know it is a lie. If Zach say it is a lie you know it is true. If Zach suddenly writes extensively about some subject not seemingly important then you know THAT is the next focus of the communist left. Zach has never been right. Coincidence? I think not.
He is the guy you want on your left at the blackjack table in Las Vegas. Zachriel: The United States invested heavily in raising people into the middle class through the GI Bill.
JustMe: Zach has never been right. Then you don't believe there was a GI Bill? Or what? Or you don't think that teaching someone a trade is a way to help someone earn an honest livelihood? The G.I. Bill was not part of the war on poverty. As they often do, Z deflects from the actual issue.
#4.1.1.1.1
mudbug
on
2023-07-17 13:14
(Reply)
mudbug: The G.I. Bill was not part of the war on poverty.
The War on Poverty was a specific set of social programs beginning in 1964. Coyner compares this period to the period 1949-1964, and his claim hinges on the assertion that there were no "significant government redistribution programs" during that period. But that claim is false. As his argument is based on a false premise, his argument is unfounded.
#4.1.1.1.2
Zachriel
on
2023-07-17 13:29
(Reply)
...Chat GPT...
#4.1.1.1.2.1
Zachinoff
on
2023-07-18 00:52
(Reply)
…mover of the goal posts, climatologist, race hustler, civil rights attorney, virologist. I’m sure there is more.
Oh, by the way Zach. Fossil fuels brought a hundred times more people out of poverty than any none STEM degree ever did. And why stop at WWI veterans? The revolutionary war veterans were promised things too. Mexican War veterans. Civil War veterans. Every veteran. B. Hammer: …mover of the goal posts
The goal posts are right where they were all along. Vince Coyner compared the rate of poverty reduction in the aftermath of WWII to the period after the Great Society was implemented. He based his conclusion on the claim that there was no "significant government redistribution programs" in the former period. But that claim was false. B. Hammer: Fossil fuels brought a hundred times more people out of poverty than any none STEM degree ever did. It is true that fossil fuels powered the industrial revolution. Along with the modern market system, it has led to broad prosperity. However, education is also a key component of the spread of that prosperity, especially in the post-WWII era. B. Hammer: And why stop at WWI veterans? The revolutionary war veterans were promised things too. Mexican War veterans. Civil War veterans. Every veteran. ". . . including the treatment of veterans of the First World War," which implies there are other examples. If you read the article we linked, it stated, "From Shays Rebellion in 1787 to the quarter-million homeless vets today, generation after generation of U.S. military personnel has suffered a lack of support from their government." Regardless, the point remains. Coyner claimed that from 1949 to 1964, there were no significant redistribution programs. That was not accurate. The GI Bill provided loans and grants for education and starting businesses during that period. The GI Bill is widely credited with creating the largest middle class in history. "Regardless", ... blah, blah, blah ... ChatGPT.
#4.1.2.1.1
Zachinoff
on
2023-07-18 00:41
(Reply)
The war on poverty was designed to fail. The intent was to reduce the middle class who were not dependable Democrat voters, too much common sense and freedoms. And increase the dependent class who demanded more free stuff and would vote Democrat to get it.
For many if not most people in a reasonably prosperous and functioning economy, poverty is more a behavior than a state. Giving people money doesn't usually change the behavior. At best it can delay the pain caused by the behavior.
In ideal circumstances, we'd like to give people money to tide them over while they do the sensible things needed to make a permanent change. You don't want people to freeze or starve before they find work, still less that their kids should do so. Unfortunately, the "war on poverty" isn't focused on giving in a way that achieves this goal. Instead it teaches people that money will reliably come from some other path than employment. That makes sense only for the most profoundly disabled people, or for people who will genuinely use it to keep body and soul together while making profound emergency changes. Texan99: poverty is more a behavior than a state.
There is some truth to that. Keep in mind, however, that eighty percent of families with able-bodied members who receive food stamps or Medicaid work. There are habits of poverty, some tend to perpetuate poverty, but many are rational decisions due to circumstances. For instance, a mother works, uses processed foods to make cooking less time consuming even if more expensive and less nutritious, then its time for the couch before bed. Television is cheaper than vacations. Smart phones allow a single mother to communicate with unsupervised children. The habit of saving when frequent minor disasters can result in destitution is not necessarily seen as the best course. We're not saying these habits of poverty can't be overcome, but, even absent government support, they shouldn't be simply dismissed a irrational. Zachriel: Astrophysicist, property lawyer, affirmative action expert, search engine, newspeak dictionary, constitutional scholar, carrier of Trump Derangement Syndrome, master of the non sequitur, pretentious movie critic, high school civics teacher, financial analyst, the ackchyually guy, nitpicker, Historical art critic, armchair economist, poverty expert.
Met a woman many years ago who - when husband died - had to go on welfare to support her children and herself. Her boast was that the kids never went hungry or wore patched clothes. She was an excellent seamstress and really pinched the pennies, though some culinary choices were interesting (think bologna mashed with potatoes). Kids all brought up to be responsible, productive adults.
I thought then, and I still do, that the provincial welfare system had a serious flaw. Instead on having middle-class professionals coming to advise this woman, they should have hired her on to help others in the same situation learn how to budget, cook good but nourishing meals, and - most important - raise up young'uns to be responsible adults. But, but, but, muh Great Society Fundamental Transformation?
I wish Putler and the diabolical KGB pee pee suite mastermind Trumphitler would turn off those 'flation lasers! Hopefully Brandon could get us a dollar for a tax rebate check, maybe after the next Wunderwaffen offensive in the 51st state Ukraine. Moscow by the winter? Because those big dumb vodka swilling louts can't do war, too busy controlling America's elections. (honk!) Imagine an enemy attack on the U.S. that kills twice as many Americans every year as were killed in the entire Vietnam war. That is what the Chinese-Mexican drug war is doing right now. 110,000 Americans killed each year by Chinese drugs sent to Mexico and brought into America by the Cartels and the Biden administration. Was this part of what the Chinese bought when they gave Biden million$? Why doesn't our congress stop it? Why don't our courts stop it? The ONLY person who really tried to stop it in the last 50 years was Trump and now the Bureaucracy is trying to make sure he can never be in a position to stop it again. Who owns America and when, exactly did we lose it?
Biden Is About To Make Boating a Lot Harder - and the 'Why' Is Insane
QUOTE: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the BIden administration is about to impose stringent new regulations on boating speeds off the East Coast, all to protect the same whales that environmentalists say are being killed by the left's beloved "green energy" projects. https://mrctv.org/blog/biden-about-make-boating-lot-harder-and-why-insane From Without Affirmative Action Everyone Will Die:
"As a Black female physician, I’m basically a unicorn." Whatever you say. I don't care if you're a wombat or a pangolin, either. As a black female physician, the odds are that you got there because your skin color and genitals allowed you to jump ahead of more qualified candidates. Personally, I prefer doctors who earned their spots based on intelligence and ability. Our family doctor retired rather abruptly during Covid, which left daughter and myself scrambling. Fortunately, a nearby clinic had a sign out saying were accepting patients so daughter signed up. Her new doctor is black and has an interesting accent, but it's working out well with mutual respect. And that's what I expect from a doctor, apart from competence which should be a given.
Without affirmative action ... Progressives are having a tough time letting go of the race grifting.
2M for minority teachers failing the test ... Another grift. If you cannot do you teach, if you cannot teach you grift the taxpayer. Mass. school district axing advanced math ... A grifting trophy for everyone or no trophies at all for anyone. Mediocrity shines. California math ... High standards but equitable achievement. No calculus involved. RFK Jr stepped in it the other day. He claimed that the covid virus was engineered to kill white people but not Jewish or black people. I doubt it is true. I do think it was engineered to be a bio-weapon but not targeted at any particular race. You would thing "that" would be the story, i.e. was it targeted to particular race or group of people. But, no! RFK Jr. said the J word out loud and now he is anti-semitic or something. I'm guessing this is more about his bizarre beliefs about vaccines and conspiracy theories and perhaps even to the point of him being mentally incompetent. He has in the past espoused some strange theories.
|