We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
Still my favorite justice and not a motormouth. Understands the Constitution, listens to the arguments and makes a decision. His smile and laugh are a bonus feature.
"No practical difference"? I doubt it. They will have a hard time explaining the remarkable uniformity (+/- 1% over decades) of the past racial composition of their incoming classes if that continues. I do agree that they'll try to continue discriminating as best they can, because nobody wants to face the fact that not many blacks can really do the work (KBJ being a prime example).
It is my understanding that one of the unintended consequences of "affirmative action" was that kids who were seriously unqualified for the rather rarified atmosphere of the elite unis found themselves in classes for which they were woefully underprepared and - therefore - dropped out or were failed. Had those kids been directed towards institutions better to their abilities and interests, a lot of harm would have been avoided.
This is not so say that a certain minority (AKA "blacks") do not have the ability to succeed at a high level (think Justice Thomas); it's just that a lot of them - as in a lot of whites or other colours - are not suited to studying at these "elite" institutions. Better they succeed (as will a majorty of white students) at a "lesser" uni or even at a tech school than to be shoved up to an "elite" uni when they are bound to fail.