Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Wednesday, March 29. 2023Wednesday morning linksPETA: Crabs are people too, you know Mass misconception: The real reason we can’t outpace light speed Florida moves on school choice Tritium Panic in Minnesota - Once again, a minor incident at a nuclear plant provokes unwarranted fears. Biden Targets Air Conditioners In Latest Attack on Americans’ Quality-of-Life Choices Legacy Media Struggle to Characterize Trans Shooter’s Sex Godwin’s Law Goes Woke: UT-Austin Prof Says Objecting To Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Is “Modern Day Lynching” Air Force Academy Focus On Anti-American Critical Race Theory Training Of Cadets Majority Still See Hard Work, Tolerance, and Religion as Important American Values Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Great cokment on the tranny shooting:
"Playbook for MSM covering mass shootings: Step 1: Speculate that the shooter is motivated by right-wing hate. Step 2: When Step 1 becomes untenable, sympathize with the shooter's left-wing cause. Step 3: When Step 2 becomes untenable, forget about the shooter and just make it about guns." Step 4: If the shooter choose the target because it was unarmed, bury the story after 24 hours.
#TranniesAreTerroristsToo
Andy Ngo pointed out transgenders' stunning overrepresentation in the violent terrorist group antifa -- noting that after some nights of antifa rioting, up to 20% of those arrested for violence are trans. Again, they are being incited, and the evil, enemy-of-the-people media is cheerleading the violence. Driving home tonight listening to NPR. News segment comes on. Commentator relates the story of the school shooting and goes into moderately complete detail, with the exception of the deranged child-killer's Transgender self-identification. This self-identification has been confirmed by the police, but it's not a fact worth reporting as far as NPR is concerned, even though the associated rage is what drove the killing episode.
NPR made a 2-3 second reference to 'mental health' issues. That was it. NPR has become a parody of itself. Struggle to Characterize Trans Shooter’s Sex:
The shooter had identified her guns as "shooting things," not guns. There is debate over whether she killed kids with a shooting thing versus a gun. This is very controversial, as gun advocates favor calling her shooting things, "shooting things" versus gun control advocates who refer to the shooter's things as "guns." There is no known organization that advocates for "shooting-thing" control. And just imagine what that manifesto must read like, if they're refusing to publish it. It's as stark a tell as initial reports that somehow fail to reveal the race or political party of an offender.
With all due rspect, I propose a new gender category, to wit: Confused. Examples would include the killer and everything and everyone mentioned in the NR article
"Big Think" needs to learn how to think. The writer himself doesn't understand relativity. I wouldn't take any condescending advice on Einsteinian relativity from a site that proclaims that "moving clocks tick more slowly than stationary ones". The fundamental point of the theory of relativity is that the speed of light is the only fixed point of reference. No clock can be stationary, as all clocks are moving relative to one another. This shows the absurdity of the old example that if a twin moved to another part of the galaxy at near light speed and then returned to Earth, he'd find his twin brother had died of old age, while he remained young-of course, his twin brother, along with the Earth would have been relatively moving away from his space-craft. Maybe Einstein's theory is more of an exercise in mathematics than one of reality?
DeGaulle: This shows the absurdity of the old example that if a twin moved to another part of the galaxy at near light speed and then returned to Earth, he'd find his twin brother had died of old age, while he remained young-of course, his twin brother, along with the Earth would have been relatively moving away from his space-craft.
There are actually three inertial frames: the Earth, the outgoing astronaut, and the incoming astronaut. They will all agree on the age of the astronaut. DeGaulle: Maybe Einstein's theory is more of an exercise in mathematics than one of reality? Relativistic time dilation has been repeatedly observed. The observance of time dilation doesn't have anything to do with the case presented on Big Think, and you have completely missed my point and gone off on some irrelevant tangent. His mistake is to assume one clock can be taken as stationary. In the relativistic view, nothing is stationary and all measurements must be taken relative to the movement of bodies being measured against and even in relation to the measuring devices used.
There are not 'three inertial frames', as the earthbound twin shares the same position and momentum as the earth on which he stands. If one was to assume the two as separate, one would also have to take the other twin's spaceship as another 'inertial frame'. DeGaulle: There are not 'three inertial frames', as the earthbound twin shares the same position and momentum as the earth on which he stands.
The outgoing astronaut and the incoming astronaut are in different inertial frames. The astronaut undergoes acceleration when changing direction. There are three inertial frames: The observer on Earth, the outgoing astronaut, and the incoming astronaut. You are claiming the observer on Earth and the astronaut are symmetrical, but that is not the case. The astronaut changes direction, leaving one inertial frame of reference and entering another. The astronaut experiences acceleration when he changes direction, something he can measure with an accelerometer.
Now, you're making up your own thought experiment as you go along, contrary to the classical one, which did not go into such irrelevant matters as changes of direction, which have nothing to do with the premise. You're digging yourself a deeper hole...yet again.
#4.1.1.2.1
DeGaulle
on
2023-03-30 04:12
(Reply)
DeGaulle: Now, you're making up your own thought experiment as you go along, contrary to the classical one, which did not go into such irrelevant matters as changes of direction
Here's a statement of the twin paradox by someone on the internet, DeGaulle: "a twin moved to another part of the galaxy at near light speed and then returned to Earth". Returning requires a change of direction, and a change of direction means a change in the frame of reference. If DeGaulle isn't a sufficient citation, here's another: Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905: "If there are two synchronous clocks in A, and one of them is moved along a closed curve with constant velocity until it has returned to A, which takes, say, t sec, then this clock will lag on its arrival at A ½t(v/V)^2 sec behind the clock that has not been moved."
#4.1.1.2.1.1
Zachriel
on
2023-03-30 08:43
(Reply)
And that is what we observe. See, for instance, Hafele & Keating, Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains, Science 1972.
#4.1.1.2.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2023-03-30 12:49
(Reply)
DeGaulle: Now, you're making up your own thought experiment as you go along, contrary to the classical one, which did not go into such irrelevant matters as changes of direction
Consider a traveling twin moving at 0.99995c for a distance of 1 light-year as measured from Earth, then returning. It might be helpful to remember that the Earth and the destination are in the same reference frame. The traveler would observe the distance is contracted to 0.01 light-years, so the journey would take just over .01 years by his clock. The homebound twin, on the other hand, wouldn't observe the traveler's arrival at the destination for ~2 years, the just over one year journey it takes to travel one light-year at nearly the speed of light and the one year it takes the light to return from one light-year away. Once returning home, the traveling twin would note his clock is now at ~.02 years (twice ~.01 years). The homebound twin would see the arrival at just over 2 years on his clock. But, amazingly, the traveling twin would appear to show up just after he was seen to have turned around! (This isn't superluminal velocity: the traveler had already left on the return trip a year before the homebound twin observed the turnaround.) What's also interesting is that, looking at the others' clocks from a distance, when the twins are separating, the others' clock would appear to be slowed; while the others' clock would appear sped up when they are approaching. (None of this requires considering general relativity, but is explained entirely with special relativity.)
#4.1.1.2.1.2
Zachriel
on
2023-03-30 12:19
(Reply)
It's relative. If you were on a space ship going 0.6 times speed of light and approached by a space ship going 0.6 times the speed of light you should be able to measure that the closing speed is 1.2 times the speed of light but what you would measure is that the closing speed is sub light speed. What is wrong in the equation is that light or a substitute for light is used to measure the speed and it fails at speed approaching the speed of light and it tends to also distort measurement of mass and time. There isn't a substitute measurement medium so we cannot "prove" either option. Most people who study this simply accept the measurement as correct and ponder all the discrepancies that choice creates. A few agree that the measurement method is faulty. The vast majority simply argue against any explanation because they earned something different in college.
OneGuy: If you were on a space ship going 0.6 times speed of light and approached by a space ship going 0.6 times the speed of light you should be able to measure that the closing speed is 1.2 times the speed of light but what you would measure is that the closing speed is sub light speed.
The relative velocity would be about 88% of the speed of light. (v1+v2)/(v1*v2/c^2) OneGuy: A few agree that the measurement method is faulty. Except that there are real world implications of relativity, such as the change in the half-life of particles under acceleration. Indeed, GPS won't work without accounting for both Special Relativity and General Relativity. A key to understanding why measuring the speed of light using light or it's surrogates is to think of how a deaf man might determine the speed of sound and if an airplane might exceed that speed. If a fighter jet flies over you at mach 2 and your eyes are closed you can track it across the sky but your finger pointing at where the sound is coming from will be significantly behind the jet. AND your pointing finger will chart a course at about the speed of sound. Because that is how you are determining it's speed and the sound reaches you at the speed of sound no matter how fast the jet is flying.
That the majority still see hard work, tolerance, and religion as important American values only proves the racism inherent in American culture since hard work, tolerance, and religion are white people's values. Are mayonnaise sandwiches on white bread also an American value?
Why don’t these ecopagan hypocrites lead by example? FJB can start by having the media show up at his many homes, televising ripping the gas stoves and ac units out. Then the media can go to every government building in DC showing those ac units being ripped out. We know that won’t happen because these tyrannical authoritarians know that the climate isn’t in crisis, they just want to act on their jackbooted thuggery impulses.
Did you happen to catch Brandon’s 75 vehicle motorcade in Canada? The dipstick was going to a conference on the environment. To talk about the doom that is just around the corner unless we eat bugs and live in a teepee. Apparently the 80 or so vehicle’s is a normal thing. What a huge carbon footprint. Lead by example, Joe. You clown. Notice that we never hear about Our Democracy, (spit) anymore? FJB signs executive order after executive order like he is the King. How does that resemble a democracy? It sure doesn’t conform to the rules of our republic. Why do so many people put up with this? I’m not saying vote straight republican, they’re mostly the same color, but quit voting for communist authoritarians. Your grandchildren will thank you. B. Hammer: FJB {sic} can start by having the media show up at his many homes, televising ripping the gas stoves and ac units out.
That's not how most regulation of manufacturing works. Rather, new products must meet the new standard, but old products are grandfathered in. There's a transition period as old products eventually wear out and are replaced. Next thing you know, they'll be requiring seat belts in new cars, insulation on electrical wiring, and buildings that don't fall down on people (Hammurabi 229). B. Hammer: FJB {sic} signs executive order after executive order like he is the King. Executive orders are subject to law and court review. In this case, it's a regulation pursuant to 42 U.S. Code Chapter 77 and enacted under the Administrative Procedure Act 5 U.S. Code §§ 551–559. B. Hammer: How does that resemble a democracy? Every other day "It's a Republic not a Democracy!" It must be Woden's Day. In any case, representatives, democratically elected by citizens, passed laws which not only allow, but require the president to enact regulations to conserve energy. I can clear up Legacy Media's confusion about Audrey Hale's gender. She was a woman who so hated herself she wanted to be a man. And when she couldn't, she took it out on a bunch of people who never did her any harm, which means she was also vicious.
re Air Force Academy Focus On Anti-American Critical Race Theory Training Of Cadets
Related : An Army of None? QUOTE: Today, the American military relies heavily on the middle class, especially from the South. Sixty-four percent of recruits come from neighborhoods where households make between $41,692 and $87,850. Just 17 percent come from neighborhoods that are better off than that. A roughly equivalent share come from poorer neighborhoods. The South is overrepresented, producing more than 40 percent of all recruits. New England and the West Coast are underrepresented. South Carolina is the most overrepresented; DC (if we count it) is the least. Behind all these other problems lurks race. The Army is 54 percent non-Hispanic white and almost 70 percent of officers are white. According to the 2021 Demographics Report, 68.9 percent of all active-duty military are white, including 67.5 percent of the enlisted. However, these figures do not break out Hispanics, many of whom are counted as white. In the Selected Reserve, 73.1 percent are “white.” About 17 percent of all active-duty military are black, including 19 percent in the ranks. . . . The military no longer celebrates the white Southern military spirit, despite the continued overrepresentation of Southerners. . . . The Defense Department is very clear that this was a repudiation of the South. . . . The government is officially suspicious of white men even though, historically, they are the military. Their sacrifices made the United States a superpower. . . . Nor is Christianity welcome in a military that celebrates homosexuality and transgenderism. Nor are there many white American heroes the military can claim without offending someone. . . . Non-whites have a different problem. If America is defined by racism and white supremacy, why should they be willing to die for it? Instead of the military telling non-white Americans to be loyal and brave, a diet of Critical Race Theory tells them that the armed forces — like all other American institutions — is poisoned by racism. Furthermore, DEI programs give non-whites a reason to look for grievances, both to get ahead and eliminate white rivals. . . .Our rulers are probably crafty enough to avoid a direct conflict, but if they slip up, they will have a terrible time convincing white men to fight and die for a regime that is replacing them. It may have an even harder time telling non-whites to fight for a “racist” country. https://www.amren.com/features/2023/03/an-army-of-none/ You don't get people willing to defend the country when you've been telling them that the country they live in is a horrible, horrible place.
The DEI people are happily destroying it all in favor of their ideology. But what do they think will happen when they've reached their goal - and everyone completely distrusts everyone else? The military RUNS on trust - that everyone knows and does their jobs, that everything is ready and arrives on time when it's needed (logistics is key in modern warfare) - and DEI destroys that. Well, it'll be interesting seeing what happens, in the 'Man, what a flippin' train wreck' sort of way... James O'Keefe has uncovered money laundering in the Democrat party to evade election laws. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/03/29/james-okeefe-starts-looking-at-fraudulent-campaign-donations-fec-reported-donations-via-act-blue-appear-to-be-money-laundering/
Forget "rightwing young men." The most radicalized, vicious, hate-filled and mental-illness-ravaged group in America is white leftwing women approaching middle age or past it. Affluent White Liberal Female -- AWFL.
Less than 12 hours after the tragic shooting in Nashville by a deranged transgender activist, Katie Hobbs’s Press Secretary calls for shooting people Democrats disagree with. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11914027/Arizona-Governors-press-sec-tweets-meme-SHOOTING-transphobes-trans-killer-massacred-six.html Press Secretary Josselyn Berry is looking for a new gig. Even Katie Hobbs couldn't take the heat.
The vaccine killed over 300,000.
It disabled 1.36 million it injured 26.6 million https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/ed-dowds-grim-accounting Travel between the stars would be very impractical at several times the speed of light, so we can only know that it's not going to happen under classical physics. Not to mention you would get obliterated by space debris along a blind four light year trail for starters. It would take very little.
But we don't know what may be possibly under quantum physics. If quantum entaglement can exist, and it does, it already violates what we understand, or perhaps are capable of understanding. Considering the immensity of space and time it's unlikely that those little green bipeds have not been zipping about poking into things for billions of years. james wilson: Travel between the stars would be very impractical at several times the speed of light, so we can only know that it's not going to happen under classical physics.
A traveler moving at near light speed would experience only a short period of time between stars due to the contraction of distance. As you note, it wouldn't be practical for any number of reasons. However, that doesn't mean colonists over generations couldn't populate the galaxy. Consider sub-light travel on ships capable of sustaining life during the transit, or just eggs that are hatched on arrival. The colonists could travel for a century between destinations, take a few centuries to populate their new world and prepare for the next voyage. Call it a millennium per jump of a light year. The Milky Way is 100,000 light years across. So, if our colonists started on one corner of the galaxy, they could population the entire galaxy in about 100 million years. While not a negligible amount of time, it is certainly not out of the realm of possibility in a galaxy that is billions of years old. If dinosaurs had become spacefaring creatures, they could already be there. If dinosaurs had become spacefaring creatures, they could already be there.
Seems plausible. They already made it to Congress. A Dead Brilliant long-form essay on the Censorship Industrial Complex.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/guide-understanding-hoax-century-thirteen-ways-looking-disinformation Highly recommended. I don't think that the author understood "McCarthy affair,". To begin with McCarthy was right. Many of the communist in our government then were in powerful positions and they used their power to destroy McCarthy. After they destroyed hi they changed many of the "facts" around what happened.
|