Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Saturday, July 23. 2022Saturday linksHow and why the Thomas Jefferson Foundation trashes its own namesake Wrong, Legacy Media, Climate Change Is Not Causing Summer Heatwaves in the U.S. and Europe Minneapolis Residents Crowdfunding For More Police Two Years After “Defund” Movement NY Times columnist admits he was 'wrong' about Trump's supporters, says Russian collusion story was a 'hoax Kagan: SCOTUS must reflect public sentiment for credibility What?
Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
" How and why the Thomas Jefferson Foundation trashes its own namesake". I asked our grandson about school and he stated they had discussed slavery in the United States at length. Unfortunately the curriculum had failed to tell the students that the United States was not the only country where slavery was practiced. It was a way of the times but they don't explain that either. Nor do they explain that it still goes on today in some far away countries not to mention sex slaves today all over the world. He was surprised to hear those other details.
QUOTE: How and why the Thomas Jefferson Foundation trashes its own namesake "The recent news cycle has seen a number of articles and a television interview proclaiming that Monticello is no longer a place where you can learn about Thomas Jefferson’s contributions to American history. Instead, these stories claim that the only thing you can learn is that Jefferson was a slaveholder. These stories are disappointing and inaccurate, but not at all surprising." https://www.monticello.org/research-education/blog/monticello-and-honest-history/ No, they are not. That link is full of the same crap they push on the tour.
John Fisher: No, they are not. That link is full of the same crap they push on the tour.
Hmm. They are "pushing" the Monticello gardens in bloom; Jefferson's legacy as author of the Declaration of Independence and the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom, third president of the United States, and founder of the University of Virginia; and the fact that Jefferson enslaved over six hundred people. Turns out that, for many people, Jefferson's slaves are an important part of his legacy. You might compare Jefferson to the story of fellow Virginian, Robert Carter III of Nomini Hall. It’s not just Jefferson but so far it’s Madison too. Two people who tried to abolish slavery during their time and set the predicate for its abolishment in the future.
To highlight the fact that both were slaveholders is to be disingenuous. Unilaterally freeing their slaves would have put them at a huge competitive disadvantage to other farmers. For a more balanced view of Madison, read this: [url] https://jonathanturley.org/2022/07/22/the-truth-about-madison-and-slavery/[\url] mudbug: To highlight the fact that both were slaveholders is to be disingenuous. Unilaterally freeing their slaves would have put them at a huge competitive disadvantage to other farmers.
O suffering humanity! Robert Carter III should be more well known for his freeing his slaves. When you are the descendant of a man of “enormous wealth” like Robert Carter III was, it gives you a bit more latitude in applying your principles than those who are in debt.
mudbug: it gives you a bit more latitude in applying your principles than those who are in debt.
It wasn't enough to live off the free labor of their slaves. They lived beyond even those means, mortgaging the lives of their slaves and their slaves' children to fund the lifestyle to which they were accustomed.
#1.2.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-23 13:42
(Reply)
I find it disingenuous that the authoritarian progs seldom spend any time tarnishing the image of the slave gatherers that sold their tribal competitors to any and all races that would buy them.
And they are still selling them to this day. Yet, crickets.
#1.2.1.1.1.1
indyjonesouthere
on
2022-07-23 14:47
(Reply)
How true. I have a letter that has come down through our family over the years from a slave. She was not able to read or write so an educated woman in the family wrote the letter for her. It is quite sad as she is pleading for just a little bit of money as when freed many/most had no money or way of making a living. She also talks about never having seen her family since the time of being freed. It was with great sadness that I read her letter. Why is it always this country that gets blamed for slavery?
#1.2.1.1.1.1.1
JC
on
2022-07-23 16:36
(Reply)
There was a time in civilization where slavery was everywhere and accepted. From about 50,000 years ago until the late 1800's. Most everyone knows this to be true at some level. There were more white slaves in Africa than there were black slaves in America. Slavery still exists in Muslim and African societies and for reasons impossible to understand the elite prefer to talk about slavery here even though it ended 155 years ago. Almost every slave taken out of Africa was sold by black people to Muslims who traded them around the world. BUT, the jerkasses in life prefer to insult only certain individuals who owned slaves at a time when every society owned slaves. Why do you suppose that is??? I'm thinking it is because they are jerkasses!
#1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1
OneGuy
on
2022-07-23 18:12
(Reply)
indyjonesouthere: I find it disingenuous that the authoritarian progs seldom spend any time tarnishing the image of the slave gatherers that sold their tribal competitors to any and all races that would buy them.
The topic was Jefferson and the history of slavery at Monticello. JC: I have a letter that has come down through our family over the years from a slave. Letter from Journdon Anderson to his former master: "I got your letter, and was glad to find that you had not forgotten Jourdon, and that you wanted me to come back and live with you again, promising to do better for me than anybody else can. I have often felt uneasy about you. I thought the Yankees would have hung you long before this . . . we have concluded to test your sincerity by asking you to send us our wages for the time we served you. This will make us forget and forgive old scores, and rely on your justice and friendship in the future. I served you faithfully for thirty-two years, and Mandy twenty years. At $25 a month for me, and $2 a week for Mandy, our earnings would amount to $11,680. Add to this the interest for the time our wages have been kept back, and deduct what you paid for our clothing, and three doctor’s visits to me, and pulling a tooth for Mandy, and the balance will show what we are in justice entitled to. Please send the money by Adams Express"
#1.2.1.1.1.2
Zachriel
on
2022-07-23 21:22
(Reply)
Did he ever send a bill to his families slave gatherer in Africa? Did any of them ever send a bill or seek justice from the gatherers?
Race authoritarians always keep the conversation local, local, local. Otherwise, it gets out of hand very quickly and leaves fhe local discussion far behind.
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1
indyjonesouthere
on
2022-07-24 12:17
(Reply)
indyjonesouthere: Race authoritarians always keep the conversation local, local, local.
Ah! So, Jourdon Anderson is a race authoritarian.
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-24 12:38
(Reply)
The race authoritarians were never slaves. They just grift off the slave trade of long ago but never off the slave trade of the present. Or the old slave trade in whites.
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1
indyjonesouthere
on
2022-07-24 13:04
(Reply)
indyjonesouthere: The race authoritarians were never slaves.
So, Jourdon Anderson is not a race authoritarian, even though he tried to collect from his former master, but not the Africans who were paid in guns and gold to enslave his ancestors. It's very difficult to keep track of your position.
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-24 14:21
(Reply)
Much of life is difficult for you.
Anderson was a slave...he has a beef. You, on the other hand, were never a slave and know that the slave gatherers were predominately black or Islamic. But that does not fit your world view of whites as slavers nor does the fact of white as slaves fit your view. It is much easier to condemn early America if you can ignore those facts. You and the current education establishment specialize in ignoring the full history of slavery and you do it for political purposes. You have done this since the 60's civil rights quotas which I suspect you fear losing at the SCOTUS with the new court. Biden just mandated something on the order of billions for federal projects that exclude whites and men. That is a fine case to go to the courts for the elimination of race and gender quotas.
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1
indyjonesouthere
on
2022-07-24 14:53
(Reply)
indyjonesouthere: You, on the other hand, were never a slave and know that the slave gatherers were predominately black or Islamic.
As others pointed out, slavery has an ancient history, and took many forms. The European slave trade was a trans-Atlantic triangular trade, where guns and gold were traded for slaves on the African coast, the slaves were sent to plantations, and raw materials from the plantations (e.g. sugar) sent back to Europe. The result was the implosion of communities in the African interior. https://www.britannica.com/topic/transatlantic-slave-trade But the topic of discussion of Jefferson and his slaves. As for Jourdan Anderson, you seem to be back to saying he is a race authoritarian because he ignored the slave trade in the Mediterranean.
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-24 15:08
(Reply)
That is the problem. It always has to be pointed out to you by others. You, along with racists in academia and politics are the race authoritarians. You perpetually promote victimhood for those who never lived as slaves and you also promote special treatment for those who never lived as slaves. You do this while ignoring the current practice of slavery in Africa and that blacks were a leading practitioner of selling slaves. It doesn't fit your worldview and none of it is taught in schools or universities. It is progressive politics at its best.
And Anderson...he likely knew very little of the world slave trade other than the fact that a local competing tribe captured and sold him into slavery. It is always necessary that you forget half of the slave equation.
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
indyjonesouthere
on
2022-07-24 15:58
(Reply)
indyjonesouthere: It is always necessary that you forget half of the slave equation.
Hmm. We just said, "slavery has an ancient history, and took many forms." We then touched on the trans-Atlantic triangular trade. Not sure your point. Did you bother to check out the link? Anderson's letter is quite poignant and not a little humorous. But he sought compensation from his former master, so according to your reckoning, he must be a "race authoritarian." Trying to stay on topic: Are you saying slavery is not an important aspect of the history of Monticello?
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-24 16:19
(Reply)
Slavery is a far more important aspect to the authoritarian progs in education and politics. It is important to keep the "slaves" woke and on the progs plantation. The authoritarian progs are losing the Biden taco vote and are desperately needing the slave vote. You are a perfect example of the woke vote and I have observed since the 60's the desperation of dems to maintain control of the courts and congress. The democrats make it uglier every year.
#1.2.1.1.1.2.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1
indyjonesouthere
on
2022-07-24 16:51
(Reply)
New York The Wonder City
This travelogue view of New York City was released by Castle Films just before WWII, and features highlights of the Big Apple from Wall Street to downtown, City Hall, the "Tombs" of the city prison (demolished in 1941), Brooklyn Bridge, the Bowery, Harlem, Lower East Side, Chinatown, Greenwich Village, the Hudson River and the ocean liner docks, the Flatiron Building, the Empire State Building, Chrysler Building, Public Library, Park Avenue, Radio City Music Hall, Rockefeller Center, Central Park, Columbia University, Riverside Drive, Times Square and more. 9:42 video https://archive.org/details/72332DNewYorkTheWonderCity "Climate change is not causing those Summer heat waves"
They showed two UK weather maps on TV the other day. One from 1977 (I think) and the other from last week. The 1977 map showed higher temperatures but they showed those temp readings beside a emoji of a smiling sun. But in the recent one they showed the high temps in bright red with a blood red for the hottest areas. What message are they trying to send with those colors? It was actually cooler than 1977 but it looked awful and made you hot just to look at it. Hmmmm! QUOTE: Kagan: SCOTUS must reflect public sentiment for credibility She belongs in Congress, or better yet an appropriate NGO (e.g. Common Cause). Sentiment?
Jeez, I'm a woman, and she makes me embarassed to be one. Sentiment has no place in judicial affairs. I don't want people to feel SORRY for me, I want them to define and deliver JUSTICE. According to Constitutional and legal precedent (with the Constitution taking top consideration). She needs to be encouraged to retire to a "caring" job - charity, the arts, or social service. She does NOT belong in any part of the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court. And, that goes DOUBLE (maybe TRIPLE) for that ID10T Sotomayer. Isn't that what Germany did in the 30's?
What she doesn't understand (and why she was appointed) is that we have a perfectly good constitution and if we abide by it and enforce it we will remain free and thrive. All of the other paths the left would prefer we take lead to socialism and then communism. Something was not quite right with the attack on Lee Zildin. If you watch the video he walked up like Biden does. He had to hold on to the side of the stage and he walked slowly. When he brought his arm up with his "weapon" he did it slowly and hesitatingly. It looked like he was drunk or senile. Seriously if you intend to sucker punch or stab someone speed is essential. I'm not saying it was all fake or anything like that I'm simply saying that it wasn't really what we think it was. Still an attack/assault legally but I'm not sure it was serious. Just saying.
I agree he was moving very slowly as if inebriated or just "feeling good" from some kind of drug. Still he did it.
He's an Iraqi war vet with a history of mental problems. He lost his wife fairly recently (death) and his brother is raising his two children. He's been out of work for a long time, and apparently has been in a kind of long-term unraveling. If you watch the whole video, the crowd reacted well and just sat the guy down and put zip ties on him while he cried. I'm a little surprised, given his history, that they didn't put him under observation for suicide risk, but I'm not an expert. The press is kind of painting a picture of another James Hodgkinson-type rage episode (Senate softball game shooter) but I'm not even sure there is that kind of motivation at work here.
AOC is now suddenly worth millions. Nancy Pelosi is worth hundreds of millions, Obama got a 60 million advance to write his book (did anyone buy his book). These are just the tip of the iceberg. All (most all, probably not Rand Paul) of our congress people are bought and sold like stocks on the stock exchange. Where are the investigations? What did Obama give while in office to "earn" his $60 million? What has AOC given? We need 535 special prosecutors.
Idaho: AOC is now suddenly worth millions.
AOC is not worth millions, or even one million. Idaho: Nancy Pelosi is worth hundreds of millions, The Pelosis made most of their money in the California real estate market, which has been red hot for decades. Idaho: Obama got a 60 million advance to write his book (did anyone buy his book{?}). Yes. Barack Obama was a best-selling author before he became president. Dreams From My Father sold over 7 million copies in 40 languages. Now, he and his wife continue to write best-sellers. Michelle Obama's Becoming sold over 14 million copies. That's right "Dreams of my Father". Wasn't that the book where he said he was born in Africa?
QUOTE: Dreams From My Father: A month. That’s how long we would have together, the five of us in my grandparents’ living room most evenings, during the day on drives around the island or on short walks past the private landmarks of a family: the lot where my father’s apartment had once stood; the remodeled hospital where I had been born; my grandparents’ first house in Hawaii, before the one on University Avenue, a house I had never known. Oh yeah that hospital that he wasn't born at but his grandmother who worked for the state faked a birth certificate from that would pass a simple test of authenticity. And his supposed mothers residence was actually someone else's home and they never heard of her. And then there was that time his aunt who was at his birth but it was in Africa. She kept telling her story but the press ignored it and finally Obama got her to shut up. Those were good times, right?
#6.1.1.1.1
IdahoBob
on
2022-07-24 00:03
(Reply)
IdahoBob: Oh yeah that hospital that he wasn't born at . . .
Your original claim concerned how Obama made his money. When this claim was shown to be false, you made a new claim that he had said in his book that we was born in Africa. When this claim was shown to be false, you made yet another claim.
#6.1.1.1.1.1
Zachriel
on
2022-07-24 09:06
(Reply)
..."Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said on Thursday at a conference that the legitimacy of the Supreme Court is tied to its conformity to public opinion, Reuters first reported."
I certainly hope that Kagan has been misquoted or misrepresented here. While I don't think she's a particularly gifted jurist, I don't want to believe for a moment that she's as disconnected and out-of-touch as this implies. Not only because of her titled role as a defender of the Constitution (not defender of Public Polling), but because many of the court's recent important decisions have been designed to pull power away from government's control, either by returning the authority to state legislatures, or to specifically limit the reach of unelected administrators - in other words, returning power to the citizen's decision-making process. If you read the column by Stephens on how he now understands the Trump voters you will find he never mentions immigration once which means he understands nothing.
Project 65 is an effort by the Democrats to cover up the stolen 2020 election AND to intimidate anyone who dares look into election fraud. 65 lawsuits were filed to discover evidence of election fraud. Dark money funded Project 65 to investigate these 65 lawyers and law firms to intimidate them and harass them into never doing it again. They are going after their business and their personal life. Where did this dar money come from?
This answers the question of why all the commentators and talking heads always say there was no election fraud. They have been intimidated and are terrified of the left. Is this the begining of the Nazification of America? |