Maggie's Farm

Since you don't understand how a greenhouse works, maybe you should shut up.

You project again. I'm not trolling, I posted a fact. You don't understand science, and you repeatedly post the same bullshit even after being called on it.

Since that's a fact, why do you do it? Why do you post misinformation? And why do you avoid this question repeatedly, even while answering (usually incorrectly) questions that weren't asked? Why do you refuse to learn anything?

As for how a greenhouse works, here's a primer. It's for you, b/c the other posters here are generally bright and know quite a bit about science and engineering.

http://www.greenhouse-management.com/greenhouse_management/greenhouse_heating/mechanisms_greenhouse_heat_loss_gain.htm

Oh, and since you'll miss the point, monoatomic and homonuclear diatomic molecules readily are involved with convection and conduction.

And again, your comments about a trivial effect of radiative absorption by a low concentration of polyatomic molecules do not demonstrate convincing evidence that warming of the Earth is due to CO2 emissions. You simply state some trivia and then insist that's a logical deduction. It's not, b/c you don't know what logical deductions actually look like. You don't get anything that requires intelligence, b/c you're a (((fool)))

That you think what I noted doesn't contradict your assertion just shows you don't know what you're talking about.

Fool.

Wrong on so many levels.

But most importantly, the effect to slow the transfer of heat is very small b/c conduction and convection still occur, taking heat from lower levels to upper levels, where they radiate into space.

Since this is a major factor in heat transfer, and the CO2 levels you fret about have changed only slightly, and are dominated by vapor phase H2O concentrations anyway, the overall effect is minimal.

That's why you're a fool. And you come from a line of (((fools))).

"We"?

Really? Then do so. I challenged you on this before and you couldn't even identify the first principles, let alone use them to demonstrate any sort of logical conclusion.

So answer my questions before you go volunteering other questions (that you can't answer correctly either).

You last comment doesn't have any relevant content. You might want to check your transmission.

Sure it does. You make ridiculous claims w/ no support for them, I certainly owe you no time to correct them. What I give you is from my own generosity...your C-PS doesn't work on me, and your whining about it doesn't bother me. Actually I enjoy watching you whine.

The blackbody (or graybody) temperature is determined by Planck's law.

Haha. That's far from the only principle involved, otherwise they wouldn't have so many failed computer models. And it's not a first principle either.

We can determine from first principles
And you certainly failed to live up to your own claim. I don't need to put words in your mouth to show you're a fool, I just need to repeat what you write.

As I've shown for years, you know nothing about this subject, nor the claims you make. You are simply a liar repeating the same lies over and over. Which is why you have been banned from so many sites.

I enjoy demonstrating your stupidity and dishonesty to the world.

But you owe answers as to why you keep posting lies.

So this is your response when proven wrong. Pathetic. Except it proves every criticism I have about you is 100% correct.

If you don't like when I point out you are a (((stereotype))) then don't be a (((stereotype))).

But you can't help yourself.