Maggie's Farm

'Voter Fraud' has become as absurd a term as 'Global Warming' if you ask me. Some say all elections have fraud, some say the fraud was not on a scale to change the election results. The first is almost guaranteed to be true, the second is designed to defuse the argument by re-direction.

There is a list of single immutable points on the 2020 election: - The vote counts in disputed states was interrupted (this is without precedent).
- The vote counts resumed under suspicious circumstances after poll witnesses were sent home, and large numbers of votes were tallied for Biden when opposition witnesses were not present.
- Republican poll watchers were harassed at the polling places and escorted out.

All of these things are in violation of election law.

More importantly are the issues with absentee ballots. Although contested states agreed to audits, re-canvassing, and signature checking by bipartisan groups, much of this did not occur. Although protests have been filed, the protests have not been addressed. And in the one example case where bipartisan groups were allowed to verify signatures, the Democrats own poll watchers rejected 11% of the sample set, which if projected to the total vote, would result in rejected ballots orders of magnitude greater than the difference in the tallied results between Biden and Trump.

You don't need to argue 'Voter Fraud'. This is a term that is a rhetorical cul-de-sac, on its way to becoming a pejorative, like 'Climate Denier'. You'll be labeled a crank for insisting on it, and that is falling into a trap. Rather, keep asking why procedures were not followed. Ask for explanations why they were avoided. Ask why in no court, State or Federal, was the evidence considered or the process of discovery allowed. Ask for explanations of the above infractions on election law. See if you get intelligible answers.