Maggie's Farm

After yesterday's ghoulish display I'm surprised you dare show your giant cyclopsian monochromatic green eyeball around here, Liarbot.

That is incorrect, Gasbot. In fact, it's handwaving newspeak, as you well know.

You're out of your element, obviously. Not the outright lying - that is your element. Pertinence and simple decent human reason and civility. Your machine babbler routinely comes up wanting in those categories, but I repeat myself.

Tell me, are communist revolutions generally honest, Shitburg, or they always predicated on the takeover of language, the inversion of meaning, and the overthrow of society? Us normal humans see the progression. Machine reason not so much, and Gasbots not at all, that being their express purpose.

Put another way, given how you prevaricate as a matter of course - and in this instance put something precisely on its head in a transparent ploy to handwave and troll - shall we conclude Utopia is always built on the lie?

Trick question. I notice you haven't addressed our points.

^ The Gasbot continues to invert meaning in its daily discharge of Newspeak. Normal humans call this lying.

Gasbot has built its reputation on the infallible consistency of its weaseling and lying. The point it won't stop avoiding - because it'd throw a wrench into its whirligig of lies if it didn't - is that somewhere along its moral trajectory some progressive could decide to let a 5 year old choke on popcorn in front of the teevee because her mental health was afflicted by raising Junior. As if that's not a contradiction, which of course it utterly is. And the left would probably crow about the holy virtues of "choice" and "liberty" down at some tainted progressive congregation somewhere. Black is white, roboticism is humanity, and Gasbot isn't a transparent baiting panel of trolls.

If the incessant Ghoulbot shitburg of royal-weeing diseased reason that floats by the window every day refuses to establish a prohibition against something you can bet there's a reason for it instead. Kinda like it trying to bait everybody into advocating murder in this thread pursuant a popular figure of speech after as much as defending such real terminal "choice" by conscious omission yesterday.

While I can understand that such inhumanity exists, I can't understand how it went missing and I certainly don't expect to let it go without a passing mention. I guess that makes me human instead of some deranged clattering machinery with a penchant for outright mendacity.

Notably, you didn't attempt an answer.

Pot/kettle.

STFU, you inhumane gaslighting prevaricator. Your pathetic reputation is etched in stone.

We'll keep you comfortable while a discussion among actual humans ensues, Gasbot.

No kidding. Gasbot's breathlessly in depth analysis should have brought it enlightenment - bluntly, the Civil War was a technically illegal act; an unconstitutional federal aggression that harmed everybody except the real perpetrators of social injustice, such as it was.

Bizarrely but not surprisingly, Gasbot leaps to the conclusions formed by bias; it rolls its little apparatus up to the facts to deduce more or less their inverse: The south induced a war upon itself blah ergo Constitution blah ergo principle.

A typical five-step Gasbot path to reason in which the first and last points contradict one another and the middle three are absent or assumed. The power of bias to remodel history. Trolling.

Notably, you didn't attempt an answer, Gasbot. Sound familiar, Gasbot? Why is it that notably, you never attempt an answer when the topic turns to the left's outright mendacity and ruthlessness?

1. The left's outright mendacity and ruthlessness.
2. ...
3. Some shit happens.
4. ...
5. Utopia!

Notably, you never attempt an explanation of your governing philosophy, Gasbot. Why is that? Seems a touch problematic, right Gasbot?

Gasbot: None of that impacts the scientific evidence supporting global warming.

The scientific evidence supporting global warming is less compelling than the scientific evidence supporting global cooling, NewspeakBot.

Gasbot: That would be the First Amendment.

No, NewspeakBot, that would decidedly not be the 1A. It would be precisely misaligned with the 1A because it is instead the statist religion of progressive secular humanism, the stated ideal that all truth is subject to whatever trailer park of sheer mendacity the tyranny of the majority NewspeakBot wants to drag it through. Hence: Newspeak.

What, you think we don't see this proud tradition of NewspeakBots worldwide? In fact, we normal humans see that Newspeak fits the bill precisely: Steal the language, invert meaning, and take over what had been normal humanity. Gasbots are experts.

Why is such evil the constant traveling companion of progressive NewspeakBots, Gasbot? We note that with all your gaslighting you've avoided the question.

You're "scientific" position has been factually refuted countless times, Gasbot, and is regularly shown to rely on cherry-picked data, revised data, corrupted data, selected models, ad hoc models, presumed modeling, and the nonsensical "first principles" that the above simply can't support.

There is no global warming that "science" has discovered. The premise is still trying to mold data into its own image.

That's not opinion, Gasbot, because each instance is supported. In other words, your scientific position is a running attempt at bias confirmation issued by way of your endless trolling of regular normals who simply already know better.

As for the political component, you've also been exposed countless times as a leftist shill and babbler. Most of us have deduced you're either paid to promote your endless condescending crap or some bizarre experiment in machine learning released into the wild. Why? Because you're incapable of normal, honest, good faith human discourse.

If AGW was supportable you'd be able to discuss it honestly. Neither of those are true.