Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Friday, August 24. 2018Friday morning linksLife lessons from his friend in the face of death
America’s Invisible Pot Addicts - More and more Americans are reporting near-constant cannabis use, as legalization forges ahead. Magic mushrooms to treat depression? This Peter Thiel-backed startup just got FDA okay to begin trials David Horowitz: Visa, Mastercard Cut Off - Payments to My Think Tank Based on SPLC ‘Hate Group’ Label Suspicion of dark hidden motives is corrupting the leftist mind Sierra Club: Democrats are Losing Interest in Climate Change Why Are Democrats (And The Media) Still Trying To Rehabilitate Socialism? 8-Year-Old Girl Walks Dog Around Block, Police and Child Services Investigate Mom Majority of Public Employees Don't Want to Be Forced to Pay Union Dues Palestine: A false road to statehood Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
r.e. the Quillette link: I know all too well the temptation to attribute to my neighbor, whenever I happen to disagree, every vile motive that strikes my fancy. Many of my regrets from my teen years are tied up with that. I can safely say that a steady diet of activist publications in the early teen years does not do wonders for one's peace of mind or one's tact.
America’s Invisible Pot Addicts - More and more Americans are reporting near-constant cannabis use, as legalization forges ahead.
I could have told you government granting people the liberty to choose what they want to do with their own bodies was a bad idea. I remember well back in aught-diggety when, in a fit of unbridled benevolence, government granted people the liberty to choose which foods they wished to consume. I said at the time that some day a greedy capitalist preying on food addicts would invent a food emporium where food addicts could freely buy as much non-nutritious food as their greedy little pig hearts desired, even to the point where these poor addicts would need some sort of mechanical mobility device to traverse the shelving of the food emporium. Or worse, someone would come up with the idea of allowing food addicts to stay at home and order their foodstuffs via electro-telegraph devices and have their purchases delivered by bicycle-messenger boys. Nope, it was a bad idea to grant the peasants more liberty than is good for them, the poor ignorant deplorables don't even know what's for their own good and will simply abuse their freedom of choice to make poor choices. And now I've heard some sophists even go so far as to claim that "everything that is not permitted is forbidden" is a poor way for a government to operate, as if always seeking permission from government before taking any action is not demonstrably the wisest way to run things. Why, if you allowed people to do what they wished with their own bodies, you'd have not only food addiction and drug addiction but some day such abominations as abortion, sodomy, prostitution, atheism and who knows what all under the banner of "my body, my choice." Except for the repeal of laws forbidding the rental of labor for less than $7.25 per hour, of course, nobody's insane enough to believe that freedom of choice extends to allowing consenting adults to determine for themselves the value of labor. Cute! But do you really mean it? Would you then allow all drugs, legal and illegal to be sold over the counter? If not than I doubt your sincerity.
Pot laws and all drug laws are not written to protect us from ourselves as the liberals claim. It is to protect the rest of us from you. When you are high you do stupid things, put our lives at risk, seduce our children, destroy property and steal to feed your habit. Yes, yes, I know; "not pot smokers!" Oh, no! Pot smokers are just laid back. Then there is the argument that drug laws or the war on drugs isn't working. Well neither are the laws against rape or murder should we legalize that as well? If you want to smoke pot I don't really care. You can get drunk and pass out in the gutter too, I don't care. But as soon as your libertarian lifestyle negatively impacts mine or my loved ones I want laws to stop that. Almost every "adult" agrees. That is why we have the laws. Not because we are trying to harsh your mallow. The way we handle booze is not to outlaw it but to outlaw behaving irresponsibly while under its influence.
People argue over whether pot is addictive, but it would be hard to convince me that it's any more "addictive" than booze. Probably neither is addictive in the traditional physical sense, but both are irresistible to some kinds of personality. I honestly can't see any good reason to treat pot differently from booze. " I honestly can't see any good reason to treat pot differently from booze."
How about psychedelic mushrooms or heroin? LSD or cocaine? Would you allow someone who is using drugs to babysit your children? Drive a truck? Be a policeman? Where do you draw the line? Simple say that anyone over 18 can consume any drug and that they be sold over the counter but if you commit an illegal act under the influence of that drug than we deal with it? That seems to be what you are saying but we know that when people are high or even just under the influence that they do stupid/terrible things. Are you OK with doubling or tripling the murder rate and accident rate? If we try it, i.e. allowing any adult to do what ever drug they choose, and instead of 70,000 a year dying from overdoses it becomes 250,000 is that OK? If it isn't OK how do you prevent people under the influence from doing what people under the influence do? Imagine you have children and someone gives your daughter hard drugs and gets her hooked. You do understand what goes on in these drug houses don't you. And then once she is hooked do you know how she continues to get the drugs her habit requires? Is this OK with you? You do understand that opening the floodgate may have terrible consequences. But it's just pot, you say. But there is a reason why pot is known as a gateway drug. If you are high on pot you are unlikely to refuse another drug. So where do you draw the line??? Every day in every way the SPLC comes to resemble Red Channels.
The Quillette article is very good. It describes my own thinking in the 80's, though it is much clearer in thought and expression than anything of mine. I think I will post on this over the weekend.
It seems the Democrats are coming to recognize that the idea/issue of human caused Climate Change is a political loser or, at best, not a vote motivator.
You said a mouthful, there. The past two years have very clearly shown that the party is bereft of political ideas, has no philosophical vision or message, and is focused squarely on political tactics for short-term advantage. For an organization that is driven by these factors, when a tactic doesn't work, it is dropped and replaced.
Favorite line from the link: "Still you have to wonder how hard the Democrats can chase the green space alien demographic without alienating some of their more mainstream supporters."
QUOTE: Immigration patterns and demographic trends indicate that those numbers will increase steadily in the years to come, and eventually, I repeat, all of Western Europe will be under sharia law. If present trends continue, in a few thousand years, the mass of humanity and their cattle will swallow the sun. That's fair, Zachriel. "If present trends continue" is always a red flag phrase. Present trends don't always continue. Immigrants who move to Western countries have more children than the natives, but that diminishes rapidly. Lots of Europe is pushing back against current levels of immigration. Immigration is concentrated in cities, and whether that spreads to suburbs and rural, and whether it is sustained in said cities, is extremely variable.
Six years ago, my wife and I were host parents to a 16-year-old Danish girl. She is visiting us this week. In a conversation on now Europe, she said, “We now have self-segregated neighborhoods. We have never had segregated neighbors.” She spoke, of course, to Muslim neighborhoods. I said, “And the police do not go into those neighborhoods.” She said, forcefully, “No, the police do not go into those neighborhoods.” Denmark has passed laws, Sweden seems to be succumbing, France has no idea what to do, Germany rolls over, and the rulers of Britain wear blinders.
Try here.
The lucianne site has been hacked many times in the past. https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/271128/mastercard-visa-and-war-freedom-center-daniel-greenfield Why are Democrats (and the media) still trying to rehabilitate socialism?
They know that Socialism would be a great success if only the right people were in charge. Obviously Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Min and Chavez were not the right people. You just have to keep trying. Big Tobacco has now become Big Marijuana. The death dispensers, just like for tobacco, have convinced the public that smoking marijuana is not only harmless, but healthy and treats a plethora of medical situations.
It is all a lie. Marijuana is just as harmful as tobacco, and not only does it harm you physically, it can lead to permanent brain damage and mental illness (psychosis and schizophrenia being major mental illness results). And why is it so lucrative and spreading so rapidly? Because it is an addiction. I'm hoping it keeps the TDS crowd sprawled out in the basement and shrinks the Antifa thuggers down to a more manageable size...although the munchies are likely to add to the dimensions of the already chunky participants.
|
Tracked: Aug 26, 09:41