Maggie's Farm

Junk like that piece are for ostensible traditionalists to exercise their sexual humble brag. Look at me, I'm all straightlaced and upright except where sex goes, at which point, gosh darn it, I just can't help being a randy reductionist what believes in some good old rutting. Cause seed-sowing is in my hyper-masculine genes and Darwin and whatnot.

You know, like apes have wild rampant orgies and publish Playboy and hang out around Ashley Madison.

There's a cleansing lextionary coming tomorrow.

I should rephrase just for you what you pretend you don't understand? How's that play out in your head?

Obviously, having interpreted something you claim you don't understand to fit an expectation anyway, you're entitled to it's writer rephrasing it for confirmation.

Like I said, How's that mentally play out?

I will answer one thing. I suggest nobody - including some group, as you put it - follow it. Some things are just put out there, especially when what they question had no real chance of actually ever being considered in the first place. Seems to me we believe about ourselves what we want to, while our formal beliefs about externalities follow...

Oh FFS, and here we go...

Tell me, does man's will need religious hammering into shape because he's a brutish, dimensionless ape born out of some ooze by accident and endless eons, or is man a creature, as I believe some old thing once went - before everybody forgot it except maybe on Sunday - created in G-d's image?

Because if it's the latter he sure gets off on the former a lot.

I can't tell

Bloody hell, as if that needed saying, you utter dimwit.

Wait, there's more? You going to roll out the big lumber now?

Have you talked with a mental health professional?

And there it is, the dumbest shit on the net. Since you more or less ask, I couldn't function at your reduced level after a month of trying. But nice monotonic paragraph, Shakespeare. Why even bother punctuating it.

Go back to defining bias or something else you know absolutely nothing about. Better chance there of inducing half a chuckle, imbecile.

That's a cute rhetorical avoidance for the anonymous subpar who goes around securely initiating random accusations at what naturally interrupts its lapses of intellect and integrity, surmising that it's schizophrenic.

You know, the tells of disorder like that are in fact interpersonal dishonesty and projecting external appearances, which is also dishonesty.

I'd call that capitulating before you began, jeenyus. But does a fundamental intellectual dishonesty serve retarded integrity well? Beats me.

Clear and understandable enough for you?

Because apparently this isn't clear to you yet: As the subpar you are, your initial reputation hangs from your consistently poor reasoning. But then, as some contributing evidence of the caliber of your integrity, you stalk and ambush folks you haven't the brights to understand, anonymously project onto them things that could just get you put on your ass had you done it in person, exhibit tells of a significant limitation of character, and with all this genius under your belt, expect that this aggressive moth-to-that-flame act of yours warrants some sort of explanation. Some clarification from the things you attack.

Well, there it is then.

Just maybe you should wise up and consider that while limited grey matter put you in that spot, staying there just amplifies the diagnosis. If you haven't figured the rest out by now, I'm probably the last guy to explain it to you.