Maggie's Farm

Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False:

I'd be be rather surprised if I found this among contemporary throngs of neo-Darwinist rightists, whose lifestyling displays have in recent years given them to all sorts of reductions of humanity more aligned with the atheistic left. Not least of them is the my-hormones-made-me-do-it pop fiction of men and women being products of their pants, or the foolish I'm-a-predator-by-nature's-random-design cultism seemed somehow appropriate for conservatives these days.

And that's before we delve into science's increasing upendednesses, where one after another our neo-Darwinian conceptions of nature, archeology, and the cosmos risk being almost certainly false or at the least, terribly incomplete.

Contemporary industrialized Science! has proved its presumed inherent myth-proofing about as successfully as it's kept up with cataloging discovery; not worth a crap.

So there's hope. Maybe rightists will reclaim their loftier, more classically enlightened ideals where people were minds and souls housed in temporary bodies and the universe was a thing of wonder and awe and not a tool to be mastered by the unmitigated prowess of one of its delusional microscopic denizen species...