Maggie's Farm

Re: The San Bernardino shooting/terrorist attack.
The Democrats wasted no time in calling for gun control. There is a lesson from history here. After the 1996 mass shooting in Australia the left moved quickly to push through a massive gun control/confiscation. The left believes that you should never let a crisis go to waste and that worked quite well in Australia. But American has that pesky 2nd amendment and unlike Australia pushing through a quick and dirty gun registration/confiscation law is not so easy. Obama and his minions in congress want to take away our right to own and bear arms and he may well try to do it by presidential decree. If we still had a Democrat congress they would simply ‘deem’ it legal. A stacked Supreme Court would then most likely find unwritten support for the new ‘law’ in the constitution right next to the right to kill babies.
Why is the left so intent on confiscatory gun control? It certainly is not about the lives lost because more lives are lost to guns on a long weekend in Chicago than in the San Bernardino terrorist attack. Chicago has gun control but amazingly it seems criminals don’t obey those laws and still acquire guns. So why is the left so invested in gun control?
I think the left intends to flood the country with immigrants who they know will vote for Democrats. I think that the left knows that as we slouch towards 3rd world Marxism that many Americans will wake up to what has happened and resist this fundamental changing of America. Or maybe another way of putting it would be that with an armed populace the left cannot rush headlong into the ‘Marxist NWO’ and they are running out of patience. After all Russia confiscated guns before forcing communism on their people and Germany confiscated guns before forcing Nazism onto the Germans. The left has historical precedent that they cannot ignore; you cannot enslave an armed free people. The leftist road to serfdom is coming to it’s destination and that pesky 2nd amendment must go.
There is an irony in the San Bernardino terrorist attack. In the early minutes the word was that it was three white men. The MSM and Democrats were salivating (and tweeting things they can’t take back). How lucky was this, another mass shooting and by white men. The left was silly with glee. But wait, but wait. It turned out to be two Muslims. And worse one of them was a Muslim ‘woman or child’ immigrant that Obama told us we were bigots to be afraid of. Even Obama’s last minute fallback position that ‘maybe’ it was just workplace violence fell apart when the facts began to come out. Clearly this was preplanned and just as clearly it was terrorism. What’s a lefty gun grabber to do???

The MSM would have you believe that all mass shootings are committed by home grown white men.

"http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/coulter-san-bernardino-shooters-unknown-here-are-some-past-mass-shooters"

"The media are tickled pink whenever they have a white perpetrator because it happens so rarely in a country that is majority white."

I suspect Ann Coulter is on to something here. For some reason white privilege doesn't extend to having attacks on whites by minorities being reported by the MSM. As soon as it became obvious that the San Bernardino shooting was committed by Muslims the MSM began cautioning everyone not to jump to conclusions. Too late, half of the Democrat politicians had already broken their legs jumping so far to conclusions. Now Cair is advising us to be careful to not cause a backlash against Muslims. It bothers me that Cair (who are undoubtedly a terrorist organization) and our Democrat politicians so often find themselves in bed together.