Maggie's FarmWe are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for. |
Our Recent Essays Behind the Front Page
Categories
QuicksearchLinks
Blog Administration |
Monday, August 11. 2014Monday morning linksFarmers’ Kids are “Underage Labor” and Must Stop Working Blogging Alone - Review: ‘The Vanishing Neighbor’ Strange facts about birds If people can’t be bothered to dress for the occasion, they are not welcome at my funeral. The Perils of Attachment Parenting Ole Miss email domain is racist according to university administrators Eight More Things You Didn’t Know Are Racist On the Collegiate Arms Race on Amenities Why Are There So Many Women in Public Relations? A new bio of Clausewitz How could Central American children have made this trip? Our higher education system fails leftist students because they're rarely challenged to think. Common Core Critics to be ‘Punched in the Face’ Warns Teachers Union President Obama’s dishonesty is blatant and habitual. It seems to me to reflect a Roads: What Happens When Libertarian Fantasies Become Reality? ‘Not all speech is protected if [it] is hate speech and it is intended to ridicule another religion’ France: Christine Tasin Convicted of Sacrilege Against Islam Steyn on the Yazidi: You want Nazis? Seeking Lower Taxes, Companies Flee the U.S. In California, Green Policies Spark Class Conflict McDonald’s Replacing Cashiers With Machines? Liberalism on the Rocks - Two recent books appraise the contemporary Left, with varying results. 6 Ugly Signs of Resurgent Worldwide Antisemitism WaPo: Obama’s authorization of Iraq airstrikes isn’t connected to a coherent strategy Islamists Around the World Rushing to Join ISIS Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
I showed a McDonald's lady how to make change when the machine was down, but I'm not certain she got the method.
A new civilization with its own mores and demons has the right to discard the names and ways of the past. Bye-bye “Ole Miss” in all its manifestations. Welcome to American Socialism and the new normal.
ISIS, the new Moslem conquerers, aren’t different in kind or goal than the old Moslem conquerers. They aren’t Nazis or Communists; they are Moslems acting the same now as in their beginning.
And, they will have to be handled the same old way, sadly.
No amount of cajoling, genuflecting, or even multi-cult memes will sway the fanatics, or even the 'so called' Muslim Moderates from their Jihad. All the while, the West fiddles, as the world burns... I got into a weekend discussion at a get-together about the ME, and how we have fostered this turmoil, and I laughed. I asked, 'how long has this turmoil been brewing?' The knowledgeable braggart commented 'since that cowboy was in office'. I quipped back, 'did you know that we've been fighting off Muslims since the early 1800's', and Mr. IQ told me to check my facts. Its not only an idealogic battle, but one of sloth and profound ignorance. Everybody seems to be missing the history of Islamic aggression and savagery. I was going to mention the Barbary Pirates, but of course it goes back further than that. The Crusades (dare we speak of them?) were a response to the same brutality and conquest that has surfaced from time to time.
And it does seem to be something that pops up from time to time (maybe it's really always there - after all, it comes straight from the Koran, but becomes more prominent at different times for some reason). Mark Steyn reminded me in a column a few months back that if you compared a picture of the graduating class, of say 1960, of a university in Cairo, they would not look very different from the same graduating class in any Western university. That can not be said of recent classes. It is really no different from what Charles Martel, then later Thomas Jefferson, then George W battled. Since Martel defeated the Islamic Moors in the 700s and Islam had only been founded in the 600s, conquering the world to convert it to Islam would seem to be a pretty original principle. Where is the outcry from "moderate muslims"? You can lose your job and even face jail in many countries for even disparaging Islam but if the leading islamist group, ISIS, decides to kill all the Christians and any muslims who don't agree with them 100% no moderate muslim even says that it is wrong. Where is the outrage that we saw after a few arabs in a prison in Iraq were photographed with their underwear on their heads? Where is the outrage that we saw when the brains behind 9/11 was water boarded to try to get information that might prevent future attacks? One black teenager assaults an nieghborhood watch person who uses a gun to defend himself and we get two years of outrage and headlines every day. Where is the outrage about what radical muslims do every day in a couple dozen countries around the world?
The situation regarding the metric system is far more complicated than the Slate article indicates. And it has nothing to due with how we price bread or gasoline. If it were only that, life would be so much easier.
The US was one of the original signers of the metric convention in the Nineteenth Century. As a consequence, all customary American units are defined by law in terms of metric standards. For example, 1 foot is defined to be 0.3048 meters (exactly). But any engineering student from the not so distant pass will know (and will have learned) that there are are several systems of units, both metric and customary, all of which are in use. The customary American units are the pound-force, pound-mass, second, foot, British thermal unit, etc. In this gravitational system, F = ma/gc. The factor gc is a units conversion so that 1 lbm weighs 1 lbf are the Earth's surface. This was the source of NASA's troubles on the Mars probes. All electrical units have always been fully metric. But American engineers also encounter the pound-force, slug, etc units, and the poundal, pound-mass etc units. For the most part, these are academic systems and have never replaced the customary system, which is still in use. In these dynamic systems, F = ma. The original metric system was the centimeter, gram, dyne, second, erg, calorie system plus a mishmash of inconsistent electrical and magnetic units. This mishmash has driven all so-called reforms since, and the changes are not yet played out. The cgs system is still in use by doctors, chemists and biologists because it is convenient to their work. In the cgs system, F = ma. When I was an engineering student, the cgs system had been replaced by the meter, kilogram, Newton, second, Joule system, and some rationalization of the electromagnetic units had been achieved. It was widely used by physicists, and ignored by all sensible people. In mks, F = ma. Then, while was an engineering faculty member, SI (System International) arrived. There was hardly any change from the mks system except for the final (?) rationalization of the electromagnetic and now nuclear radiation units. In SI, F = ma. But that is not the whole story. European engineers, like their American counter parts, don't like SI (or cgs or mks), and they often use (unofficially and discountenanced) the kilogram-force, kilogram-mass, meter, second, etc., system. In this system, F = ma/gc. Practicing engineers have to deal will stuff that was designed and built years, decades and even centuries ago, and to do so they must know (or find out) what system of units their predecessors used. So, each modernization of units creates another layer of meaning that must be translated into earlier layers of meaning, with all the possibilities for stupidity and error that humans can devise. The SI clowns are not done, and redefinitions of the second, meter have been achieved and soon the kilogram will be redefined. However, G_d willing, Americans will always be able to buy bread by the pound (mass or force) and gasoline by the gallon, and pay for them in US dollars. I worked for the Department of Commerce back in the '90s when Ron Brown decided we'd lead the way by going full metric. But they ran into a money problem. See the government has a lot of files and the file cabinets are set for customary English sizes. Problem is, metric paper is just a bit to big for the cabinets. (and at the time the paper trays). Now lots could be digitized to get around the paper problem but I don't see money coming for that either.
Like all top down initiatives, that did from neglect. Thanks, I was going to mention some of this too. The author skips a big part of the story: the changeover was expensive.
In the early 1990s, I visited NIST for a week to do some research. They had table tents all over about converting to metric. A few years later, I was a post-doc there, and they machine shop wouldn't even take drawings done in metric. The conversion to metric would be expensive. Expensive to convert machines and tools, and as JKB mentioned, even basic office equipment and furniture. That's the bogeyman in this story, as unimportant as it is. I used to amuse myself in Montreal by asking for ""environ une demi-livre" of sliced meat at the deli counter of the supermarket. I deduced that there was some law requiring precise conversion, because requesting "about half a pound" always netted me exactly 227 grams on the deli scale despite my "that's close enough" protests, even if it involved dispensing partial slices.
In the UK the 2x4 is dead at the timber merchant, instead their planed studs are all 38mm in width. Oddly, that turns out to be exactly the same size as US dimensional 2x planed lumber. Their plywood is sold in sheets that are 2440 x 1220 mm, or 4' by 8' for us ex-colonists. I'm amused that the UK sells gasoline in Litres, but measures road distance in miles. Yet if you talk fuel economy with a Brit, they will always speak of miles-per-gallon or litres-per-100km -- thus involving a conversion, rather than miles-per-litre. My memory of what happened to the conversion to metric is that a few industries didn't want to pay the costs of the conversion and coerced a few congressmen to kill the effort. This was more about politics then anything else. When discussing the costs of cnverting to metric you cannot ignore the costs of not converting. Those costs go on and on and on... I say convert to metric and get it over with.
Care to give us a list of all the other traditions we ought to casually dispense with so "everybody does it the same way"?
No. But I would argue that there are compelling scientific and economic/trade reasons for converting to metric. We were on track to at one time and as we approached the conversion date a few industries bought a few congressmen and they were allowed to end it. This choice to stop the conversion was not debated or offerred to the public for comment. It was simply torpedoed by a couple of congressment for a benefit of a couple of cronies. We are the only advanced contry in the world not yet converted to metric and it costs us billions and billions every year. It hurts our trade with other countries and cause confusion in this country. In fact a multi-million dollar space program failed thanks to our failure to convert to metric. Metric is easy. Just do it.
Thanks for including the link to the TPC article questioning how these Central American children could have made the trip across Mexico on their own.
Mike "How could Central American children have made this trip?"
I think almost everyone knew this was a fairy tale and what was really happening was a coordinated assault on our borders and our culture. The illegal activists in America seemed to be timed to work too well with the disaster on the border. The "who" is yet to be made public. LaRaza? Central American dictators? Maybe the presidents men? Who ever it turns out to be I am confident that our media will expose them as soon as they discover who is behind it. In the meantime I am sure they are actively investigating this story... That would be the Bilderbergers, the Masons, the Bohemian Grovers, The Tri-Lateral Commission--which is to say, if only they could blame the GOP how HAPPY they would be.
Prominent Russian Scientist: ‘We should fear a deep temperature drop — not catastrophic global warming’
http://www.climatedepot.com/2009/10/27/prominent-russian-scientist-we-should-fear-a-deep-temperature-drop-not-catastrophic-global-warming/ I recall Russian scientists saying this perhaps 10 years ago. I suppose that the True Believers can always accuse these scientists of being in the employ of Gazprom. The Vanishing Neighbor is a great idea conceptually, but will be altered radically when a politician seizes it as a mantra and uses it to 'alter society for the better'.
The choice of people to gain homogeneity, isolate themselves, and be partisan is a choice they should be allowed to make. I don't see it as a bad thing, necessarily. In some ways it makes people more open to seeking new experiences. This seems, and may be, counter-intuitive. But it's true. I've watched a generation of kids grow up with video games and computers and while their education has suffered (more due to poor parenting and socialist schools), their sense of community is actually much better than what I remember as a child. They are much more respectful, often to a fault, of adults. They are more individualistic, but not in a way that is steeped with self-centered behavior. They are often more willing to volunteer than kids were when I was younger. The problem addressed by this article, to me, seems to point a finger at people MY age (40+) who adopted new technologies after the maturation process was complete. It has caused them a much greater problem of having to deal with multiple inputs and massive overdoses of information. Most under 40 have dealt with the technology in more meaningful and beneficial ways. I see the points being made as one which indicate a generational divide - not a divergence in social interaction. Metric --
I used to amuse myself in Montreal by asking for ""environ une demi-livre" of sliced meat at the deli counter of the supermarket. I deduced that there was some law requiring precise conversion, because requesting "about half a pound" always netted me exactly 227 grams on the deli scale despite my "that's close enough" protests, even if it involved dispensing partial slices. In the UK the 2x4 is dead at the timber merchant, instead their planed studs are all 38mm in width. Oddly, that turns out to be exactly the same size as US dimensional 2x planed lumber. Their plywood is sold in sheets that are 2440 x 1220 mm, or 4' by 8' for us ex-colonists. I'm amused that the UK sells gasoline in Litres, but measures road distance in miles. Yet if you talk fuel economy with a Brit, they will always speak of miles-per-gallon or litres-per-100km -- thus involving a conversion, rather than miles-per-litre. The key line of that article: "Customary measures make a lot more sense to us." They are scaled to our everyday environment and experiences. Things that are racist? Everything is racist now in the "post-racial" period brought on by Obummer and his election.
|