We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
With all the recent talk about couscous here, I decided to find out what it was. I imagined it was some sort of healthy natural grain or something. All it is is a form of pasta. Empty calories.
It works great boiled in stock, then served with fish or chicken, peas and other vegetables, fried onion rings, and garlic.
Better that way imo than pasta, which tends to just taste like globs of goo.
I do prefer rice though, good rice that is, not the crap you get at discount places.
I don't see a grain as 'empty calories.' All calories provide energy to your body. The texture of couscous is different than 'pasta,' so I like it as an alternative. Plus, it cooks very quickly (5 minutes) and takes less water than standard pasta.
Would quinoa pass scrutiny as a useful grain to those who seem to avoid carbs? What grains would qualify, in your opinion, as good for consumption?
Lordy, News Junky, "...a healthy natural grain..." You really need to get out a little more. What "grain", pray tell, is not natural? With so much time spent on food at Maggies Farm, I'm surprised that you didn't know that flour used to make couscous is made from a healthy natural grain.