Maggie's Farm

fits, tho --a very good message from crost the world's longest undefended border. Thanks --

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/03/is-obama-waging-psychological-warfare-on-americans/

(picking up a few paras down)

The psychological warfare began with an apology tour in which President Obama publicly “confessed,” presuming to speak for all of us, for the shortcomings of America and our supposed contributions to tyranny and all manner of evils around the world.

This confession planted in the American mind the notion that our values and beliefs might not be in line with freedom and truth.


The president, with the help of his administration, is attempting to conduct psychological warfare on Americans who value autonomy and free will.

It was reinforced by the first lady stating during the 2008 presidential campaign that she had never felt pride in our country.

These statements were seemingly shrugged off by Americans who, collectively, seemed to be telling themselves that they were hearing discontent channeled from disenfranchised groups in our nation who, nonetheless, loved the country—and all of us, too.

But, deep inside the American psyche, something more malignant could have been planted—the seeds of self-hatred and self-doubt. And I no longer believe that those seeds were planted unintentionally by people as smart and capable as the president and first lady.

Psychological warfare has been described as a set of techniques aimed at influencing a target audience’s value systems or beliefs and inducing confessions of wrongdoing or attitudes favorable to the group proffering the techniques.

The techniques are often combined with black ops strategy, in which covert initiatives seek to dispirit, disempower and confuse adversaries.

The psychological warfare has continued, I believe, with other opportunities the president has had to make American’s question their individual freedoms and autonomy.

This has included misrepresenting horrific crimes, such as the one which unfolded in Newtown, Connecticut, as evidence of the need for gun control measures, when they clearly evidenced a need for revamping our mental health care system.

Gun rights are inextricably entwined in the American psyche with freedom to defend oneself. Attacking gun rights, I believe, is an element of the psychological warfare on the American belief that force is justifiable when confronting evil.

My belief that psychological warfare is being deployed on Americans by this American president and his administration has been solidified as news has come out of the targeting of conservative groups by the IRS.

This black ops targeting doesn’t just have the effect of slowing the financial momentum of these groups. It has the goal of dispiriting them and making them feel helpless to achieve their goals.

If liberal Americans stand by and do not seek swift and severe justice for those who perpetrated these acts, then they will have tacitly been victimized, too. Because they will have tacitly agreed that it is acceptable for their government to target certain political movements for persecution—and that will have fundamentally changed the psyche of America.

Seen through the lens of psychological warfare, the failure to defend our embassy in Benghazi need not be understood simply as a screw-up. It could reflect an actual strategy on the part of the administration to reinforce the notion that homicidal violence born of hatred toward America is understandable—even condonable—because we have generated it ourselves and are reaping the harvest of ill will we have sown. In other words, we should take our punishment.

The president said as much when he blamed the murder of our Ambassador to Libya on a film that criticized Islam.

This misstatement may disclose not just incompetence and may not just be evidence of a cover-up, but may be evidence of exactly what I am theorizing here: that the president, with the help of his administration, is attempting to conduct psychological warfare on Americans who value autonomy and free will and free markets and small government, by convincing them that they are wrong-minded, prejudiced and pathological and should deeply question their beliefs—including some ensconced in the Constitution.

The wiretapping of journalists would be, then, just another black ops technique in an ongoing war against our freedoms.

There will be those that say that many American leaders have sought to target groups hostile to their views. Some will point to President Nixon or Senator McCarthy or J. Edgar Hoover. And that debate can be had.

But I assert that this administration is engaged in a coordinated attempt to dispirit, disarm and disenfranchise large portions of the American population and to weaken our founding principles through what is best understood as psychological warfare.

And with that statement in the public domain, let us, at least, be aware and notice how many events unfold in-keeping with it, over the next months and years.

The enemy of psychological warfare is the knowledge of what is really happening to us and remembering who we really are.

===

Dr. Keith Ablow is a psychiatrist and member of the Fox News Medical A-Team. Dr. Ablow can be reached at info@keithablow.com.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/03/is-obama-waging-psychological-warfare-on-americans/#ixzz2VK8kAGzQ

===

Re the miserable case of the identity and CV, i think we all realize by now the guy is a flaming ringer.

But his handlers already knew that (our new CIA Director got to the proof and adulterated it: search "brennan passport scandal" --without the quotation marks).

By this theory, then, we the people's normalized reaction should be seen as falling into a trap.

IOW, since they knowingly put forth a ringer (and at that a ringer with a pretty easily broken 'legend'), the ringerhood may well be a tactic, a part of the attack on the psychological power of the Constitution, a way to characterize any civil strife and bloodshed as being "the fault of an old outdated piece of parchment".

After all, what can hurt the practice of Lenin's ''worse is better'' dictum?

Any crisis that the ID ruse could have caused (had the cookie crumbled a little differently), could have had no bad result for the interests Obama represents.

At worst for we the people, that is, a Constitutional crisis accompanied by inner-cities burning and bloody riots a la 1968 following after an impeachment, is good for the people behind Obama --for starters it provokes racial strife (already it has turned back fifty years of attitude progress --attitude progress that threatens the interests behind Obama), directly beclowns the effectiveness of our form of government, and cements the base of all attacks from the left, that is, ''racism'' as a charge which can be flung by the usual flingers --a charge that has been, for these handlers, an enormous help in the economic war for influence in the resource-rich third world.

So given all that, maybe just biting our tongue & waiting it out is --yes, lousy as hell, but --also perhaps, now since the vetting has so spectacularly failed, the best way from here to thwart the enemy.