We are a commune of inquiring, skeptical, politically centrist, capitalist, anglophile, traditionalist New England Yankee humans, humanoids, and animals with many interests beyond and above politics. Each of us has had a high-school education (or GED), but all had ADD so didn't pay attention very well, especially the dogs. Each one of us does "try my best to be just like I am," and none of us enjoys working for others, including for Maggie, from whom we receive neither a nickel nor a dime. Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
This logic will hit the rocks of liberal reasoning and sink. Liberals reason by virtue of moral assessment, and if there is one thing about liberals it is that their moral assessments are infallible. Nothing they put on the bad side can be equal to anything they put on the good side, no matter what characteristics they have in common. For instance, affirmative action is good, racism is bad, therefore affirmative action cannot be racism, and the meaning of the words involved has no application here.
Or for the topic at hand, censorship is bad, subsidies are good, therefore subsidies are not censorship.