Maggie's Farm

The Democrat talking heads went to a great deal of effort to make "birthers" look like conspiratorial nut cases. But the fact remains there is no birth certificate, the one he presented was a fake, he is using the SS# of a dead man from Connecticut, all of his relatives back in Kenya remember being there at his birth... So who is the crazy one; the one who thinks he may not be an American citizen or the one who in spite of the evidence is afraid to say he may not be an American citizen?

There is a certificate! I thought the only long form was the obvious fake they publiched on the White House web site. You knw the one that was proven to have copied numbers and letters from parts of a real birth certificate to paste where they provided the needed data that had been erased. The one with the sequence number that had been stolen from a real birth where the child had died. The one with perhaps 30-40 identified errors created by the forgers. The one that had been fully discredited. But you say there is another one. Where???

The birth was reported in the local paper that week. Indeed at that time it was policy thatthe paper would print notice of a live birth as a matter of fact with no proof required, you could even call it in. Regarding the address given in the newspaper about Obama’s birth gave his mother’s address as: 6085 Kalanianaole Highway in Hawaii. But President Obama’s parents, did not live at that address.

Why did Obama apply for and receive financial aid to Occidental College as a foriegn student?

Why has Obama spent more then $1,000,000 in legal fees to keep any of his records from scrutiny?


1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes.' So how can the Obama 'birth certificate' state he is 'African-American when the term wasn't even used at that time?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in "Kenya , East Africa ".

This wouldn't seem like anything of concern,except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the " British East Africa Protectorate".

3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity Gynecological Hospital ". This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", respectively. The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged.

How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?


Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-442 the very same SSN that Obama used. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii , where he died. Conveniently, Obama's grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

How did Obama travel to Pakistan in 1981? Americans were not allowed to travel to Pakistan in 1981. He could have used a Indonesia passport, but that would mean he was an Indonesian citizen. So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later?

All of these inconsistencies and lies would be investigated in depth my the MSM if Obama was a Republican. The media seems uninquesitive when it comes to Obama's past. Why?

Rove May be a Rino but I'm not convinced. McCain is a Rino and leaves no doubt about that fact. And Rove is simply not as bad as McCain. I think what Rove is, is a politician. He wants to win. He knows how to win and sometimes that means dumping the weak candidate or pushing a strong candidate that happens to be a Rino. In my opinion whjat Rove does not understand is that real conservatives would rather have a Democrat stab them in the back then a Republican/Rino. If I lived in McCain's district I would proudly vote for his Democrat challenger. Rove would rather have McCain in spite of his tendency to go over to the dark side because having McCain is a "win" for Republicans. The tea party people are fed up with electing Republicans and having them turn around and vote against us. We would indeed rather lose the seat to a Democrat then elect a back stabbing Rino.

In a very real sense I think you are right that it doesn't matter anymore the constitution lost and big government won. The turning point may have been in the early 60's or even the early 90's but it happened and I don't see a good place to make a U-turn. The best I can hope for is that this current disaster of high taxes, excessive spending and borrowing, and printing press money goes through the inevitable collapse and it wakes up the sleeping giant (the millions and millions of good people who don't vote or do vote but vote their pocketbook) and we massively elect conservative pro-constitution citizen politicians. A far more likely scenario is that the current crop of professional anti-constitution politicians will flood the country with new citizens looking for "free stuff" and beholden to them the purveyors of "free stuff" along with our home grown "free stuff" addicts and retain power forever. They will convert us to a socialist state where the constitution will be twisted and ignored at will and we will spiral down into a 3rd world country. But just as the global warmist blame severe winter weather and record low temperatures on global warming the leftist politicians will blame the demise of our economy and freedoms on not having enough socialism and will continue inexorably towards full communism where the elite control everything and set 5 year plans to get us out of the latest crisis they created. I do think that the great experiment is over. I think once Lyndon Johnson completed FDR's great works and created a government run system that enslaved a majority of voters into mere serfs that the ending was inevitable. I also think that President Reagan scared the be bejesus out of the left who must have thought they lost the battle for a socialist state. But thankfully moderate Republicans came to the rescue and put the socialist left back in power. And the moderate Republicans did much more, they so harmed the Republican brand that it may never recover. I challenege anyone to go to any inner city school (or any school) and ask two simple questions: 1)Who were the slave owners and the KKK, Democrats or Republicans? 2)Who freed the slaves, Democrats or Republicans? I doubt more then 50% will get the right answer and would not be suprised if less then 20% were correct. The moderate wing of the Republican party has doomed us to be ruled by the radical wing of the Democrat party. Simple as that!