Maggie's Farm

What's truly hilarious is how quickly, as soon as they get the vote-stealing software perfected, the next Che or Lavrentiy Beria will stand these obvious dangers to the state --on the grounds that they clearly are able to influence the people --up against the wall and shoot 'em.

Plus, they heat in the winter, and all year long don't make people look and feel like they wish they were dead.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/the-giant-gaping-hole-in-sandy-hook-reporting/

--i know. Nothing more depressing in the world tghan this. But this report --respectable source and author --has some info that --well, we just need to know.

Of course, one would expect that individuals leaning in toward mass murder might well be on psychiatric medication; and for all we know, the toll would be worse without them. But what jangles the nerves is --well, how many mass murders are perpetrated by individuals who are not taking them?

The concluding paragraphes, concerning the Virginia Tech shooter, are particul;arly alarming, as they more than suggest some sort of cover-up attempt that would have to've been across the only existing jurisdictional lines that we rely on to bring forth information we need to have.

The closing paras:



===

stand by for a couple of equally hair-raising URLs re our coming new CIA Director.

PS, having read this yesterday @ Instapundit

[url]http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/160967/]/url]

describing MSNBC as nothing more that a govt propaganda ministry, imagine my lack of surprise when i Binged [ virginia tech shooter cho played video games? ] and found page one of results alternating between yes & no finally convincingly resolving into 'yes, indeeds' --with, at the very top, indicating the most 'hits', yup, propaganda ministery MSNBC with a Chris Matthews-endorsed "nyet" to the question.

Like the old soviet Pravda, there really is truth in it, but it is between the lines.

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/160967/

--dang incandescent lighting

This is info that that's goping to be missing from the congressional hearing of Hillary Clinton's testimony re Benghazi.

I'm just going to link a Bill Whittle URL, that has three comments attached to it.

The third comment is mine (forgive late-nite typos and misspellings --esp Michelle Malkin's name), and it contains two URLs.

One a search that will show the ubiquity of the 2008 passport office scandal's reportage, and includes links to the Canada Free Press stalwart Doug Hagmann's report on Benghazi-gate, which in turn includes near the conclusion a link to a weird but --well, watch it and see --an incredibly credible youtube (Montagraph's "Proof Positive -In My Opinion") that step-by-net sleuth-step links the notorious ''innocence of muslims'' video's production and distribution to, well, your Benghazi-insider and incoming CIA Director, John O. Brennan.

--i can understand the underworld's need to sanitize candidate Obama's passport records, back in the spring of 2008. And the offing of Quarle Harris, that could've been street crime, of course. And then the subsequent employment of the passport sanitizer as counterterrorism czar, natch, par for the course in this administration.

But what i don't get is, what was the purpose of the video, before the scheme lost control of itself (if indeed it did, at all), and the murder attack on the ambassador and all the following goes-nowhere crisis interpreting, which seems to've made Hillary so ill?

http://theconservativemonster.com/?p=5938

===

God Almighty, i am SO sick of all this. Sunny uplands of civilization, wherefore art thou?